agentsclimarketplace

Case prep

Skill Zerif007/Claude_Legal-Bangladesh_Edition/bd-litigation-legal/skills/case-prep

Cluade Legal Bangladesh Plugin and Skill Suite

Install
npx -y skills add Zerif007/Claude_Legal-Bangladesh_Edition --skill case-prep

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

2 things to look at

  • 21 days oldThe repository was created 21 days ago. New is not bad, but a brand new repository carrying a familiar-sounding name is the shape a typosquat arrives in, and there has been no time for anyone else to find a problem with it.
  • 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Preps a dispute for Bangladesh courts — forum selection (suit vs writ vs special tribunal), venue, cause-of-action framing, chronology, evidence map, and procedural roadmap with deadlines. Use for "we're being sued", "we want to sue", "prepare the case", "which court", "draft the plaint outline", or new-dispute intake.

SKILL.md

2.9 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Case Prep — Bangladesh Courts

Config gate (portfolio defaults, venue, counsel panel) + root guardrails. Read references/courts-and-adr.md and references/limitation-periods.md before anything.

Intake sequence

  1. Limitation first, always. Run /bd-litigation-legal:limitation-check logic before any strategy talk. A brilliant case that is time-barred is a malpractice event. Government defendant → s.80 CPC notice (2 months) into the runway.
  2. Forum selection.
    • Exclusive statutory forums trump the CPC: bank/FI money claims → Money Loan Court (Artha Rin Adalat Ain 2003); worker claims → Labour Court; tax → appeals ladder then Tribunal then HCD reference; company disputes (winding up, rectification) → HCD Company Bench; cyber offences → Cyber Tribunal.
    • Arbitration clause present? → s.10 Arbitration Act 2001 (stay of legal proceedings); decide invoke-vs-waive strategically and flag the choice.
    • Regulatory action with no efficacious remedy → writ (Art. 102) — faster but discretionary; laches applies; disputed facts kill writs.
  3. Venue per CPC ss.16–20 and any jurisdiction clause (validity rules in courts-and-adr.md). State the court by name and tier (pecuniary limits — verify current Civil Courts Act figures).
  4. Chronology + evidence map. Dated event table with source documents; mark which documents are (a) original vs copy (Evidence Act 1872 primary/secondary rules), (b) digital (2022 amendment admits electronic records — note authentication needs), (c) unstamped/unregistered (admissibility exposure, Stamp Act s.35).
  5. Interim relief assessment: injunction (Specific Relief Act ss.52–57; O.XXXIX CPC), attachment before judgment (O.XXXVIII), arbitration interim measures (s.7A).
  6. Procedural roadmap: plaint/WS timelines, court-annexed mediation stage (CPC ss.89A), discovery limits (interrogatories/inspection under CPC — narrow by common-law standards; manage client expectations), realistic duration by forum, execution strategy at the end (O.XXI — plan enforcement before filing, not after decree).

Output

Attorney-review draft: forum & venue memo (cited), limitation certificate with the computed bar date, chronology table, evidence map with admissibility flags, interim-relief recommendation, roadmap with the next three deadlines, settlement/ADR posture per config, escalations (constitutional questions, contempt exposure, cross-border enforcement, criminal-colour disputes — cheating/CBT complaints as leverage raise ethics issues, flag).

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.