agentsclimarketplace

Investor research

Skill oncesylvia/fundraising-skills/skills/investor-research

Free, open-source Claude Code skills for founder-led fundraising — find stage/sector-fit investors (researched live, no hallucinated lists), then run cold email, warm intros & cold calls without spam. Bilingual EN/中文 (US + China). Built by a founder raising for Copay (agentic stablecoin payments).

Install
npx -y skills add oncesylvia/fundraising-skills --skill investor-research

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 3 stars3 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Deep-dive due diligence on a single investor (VC fund, angel, or accelerator) before a founder reaches out or takes a meeting. Use when a founder says "research <fund/partner>", "tell me about <investor>", "should I take money from <fund>", "what's <partner>'s thesis", or is prepping for an investor call. Builds a fact-checked profile from live free sources — thesis, recent checks, the right partner, conflicts, red flags, and smart questions to ask — never invented.

SKILL.md

4.7 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Investor research (single-firm diligence)

Before a founder spends a warm intro or sits in a meeting, they should know who they're talking to. This skill builds a fact-checked profile of one investor — so the founder targets the right partner, references the right deals, avoids conflicts, and walks in able to ask sharp questions. Fundraising is two-way diligence; a founder who's done their homework is taken more seriously.

Read shared/references/outreach-ethics.md first. Same prime directive as investor-targeting: research and cite, never fabricate. Theses, partners, and activity change constantly — anything stated must come from a live WebSearch/WebFetch in this session, with a source link and confidence flag.

What to produce

A one-page profile with these sections. If a section can't be verified, say "couldn't verify" rather than guessing.

  1. Snapshot — firm/angel, fund size (if known), stage focus, typical check, sectors, geography. Source each.
  2. Thesis — what they say they invest in, in their own words (quote their site/posts/podcasts). Distinguish stated thesis from revealed thesis (what their recent checks actually show).
  3. Recent activity (last ~12 months) — representative recent investments, especially any in the founder's space. Are they actively deploying? A fund that hasn't led a deal in a year is a different conversation. (See references/diligence-checklist.md.)
  4. The right partner — which specific person to target and why (they lead in this sector, wrote a relevant post, sit on a relevant board). Partner fit matters more than firm fit — you're pitching a person. (To go deep on pinpointing the person and finding a warm path to them, use the warm-path-finder skill.)
  5. Portfolio fit & conflicts — analogous wins that build appetite, and any direct competitor in their portfolio (usually a hard blocker; flag it).
  6. How they decide — partnership process, speed, check/ownership targets, whether they lead or follow, board involvement — whatever is publicly known.
  7. Reputation / founder-friendliness — signals from public founder references, their content, how they behave in downturns. Flag both green and red. Be fair: report what's sourced, label opinion as opinion.
  8. Contact path — how they want to be approached (submit form, warm intro preference, public email), and whether a warm path likely exists.
  9. Smart questions to ask them — 4–6 specific questions that show the founder did the work and surface whether this investor is right for them (reserve, follow-on behavior, where they add value, recent exits/markups).

Method

  • Start at the firm's own site: team, portfolio, thesis, "how we invest", submit page. Source of truth.
  • Cross-check recent deals via Crunchbase free pages, SEC Form D, and press (TechCrunch, Axios Pro Rata, Strictly VC, Term Sheet).
  • Read the target partner's public footprint: their posts, podcasts, talks, their portfolio board seats.
  • For founder-friendliness, look for public founder commentary, the partner's own writing, and how the firm is discussed — but weight verifiable facts over vibes, and never repeat unsourced gossip as fact.

Two-way diligence reminder

Coach the founder that diligence runs both ways. Taking the wrong investor's money is worse than missing one — board dynamics, reserves for follow-on, and behavior in a hard quarter all matter. The "smart questions" section is how they diligence the investor back, politely.

Output format

  • The one-page profile above (sourced, with confidence flags).
  • A 3-line TL;DR: are they a fit, who to target, what's the contact path.
  • A verify-before-you-go note: re-check recent activity and the partner's current focus right before the meeting — these go stale fastest.

Refuse / push back when

  • Asked to state a thesis or recent deal "from knowledge" without searching.
  • Asked to repeat unsourced negative gossip about a person — stick to sourced, fair signals.
  • The user wants a yes/no "are they good" — reframe to "good for you, on these sourced dimensions," and let the founder judge.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.