Fundraising agents
Skill oncesylvia/fundraising-skills/skills/fundraising-agents
Free, open-source Claude Code skills for founder-led fundraising — find stage/sector-fit investors (researched live, no hallucinated lists), then run cold email, warm intros & cold calls without spam. Bilingual EN/中文 (US + China). Built by a founder raising for Copay (agentic stablecoin payments).
npx -y skills add oncesylvia/fundraising-skills --skill fundraising-agentsAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 3 stars3 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use fundraising agents, scouts, syndicates, and accelerators as warm-intro channels — and vet them so you don't get burned or hurt your raise. Use when a founder says "should I use an FA / placement agent", "success-fee fundraising", "how do I find a scout / syndicate", "should I join an accelerator to raise", "找 FA / 融资顾问 / 后付费募资", or has run out of their own warm intros and wants network-bringing channels. Honest on when these help vs hurt, fees, and red flags.
SKILL.md
5.6 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Fundraising agents, scouts & syndicates (network-bringing paths)
When you've exhausted your own warm intros, the next lever is people/channels that bring their network: fundraising agents (FAs / placement agents), VC scouts, angel syndicates, and accelerators. Some are gold; some are predatory or actively harm your raise. This skill helps you use the right ones and vet the rest.
Read shared/references/outreach-ethics.md first. The honest line: a good
channel opens real doors; a bad one costs money, signals weakness, or is a scam.
The options (and where each fits)
| Channel | What it is | Fit | Signal to VCs |
|---|---|---|---|
| VC scout | someone with a scout check + network, sourcing for a fund | great at pre-seed/seed | positive (a fund's person likes you) |
| Angel syndicate | a lead + backers who co-invest and vouch | strong early; brings a crowd | positive |
| Accelerator | program + demo day + intro machine (YC, Techstars, sector/regional) | excellent warm-intro engine + credibility | positive |
| Operator angel | an operator who invests + intros peers | fast, warm, high-trust | positive |
| FA / placement agent | raises for you, usually % success fee (± retainer) | use with care — see below | often NEGATIVE at pre-seed |
The honest truth about FAs at early stage
- Many US VCs read "pre-seed founder using a broker" as a negative signal — it suggests you can't get your own warm intros. At pre-seed/seed, prefer scouts, syndicates, accelerators, and direct warm paths.
- Pure success-fee-only FAs at pre-seed skew low-quality (spray-and-pray to their list, which can burn investors on you). Reputable placement agents usually work later stage / larger rounds and are selective.
- FAs make more sense: larger rounds, later stage, a specific market you can't reach (e.g., a foreign founder needing US investors — where a credible, connected agent genuinely bridges the gap).
- Cross-border / China note: FA (融资顾问) is more normal and expected in China early-stage than in the US. If you're raising USD from US investors, weigh the US signal; if raising RMB, an FA is more accepted.
How to vet any of them (don't get burned)
🚩 Walk away if:
- Upfront fees with vague deliverables, or big retainer + no track record.
- "Guaranteed" to raise / guaranteed intros — no one can guarantee it.
- Won't share references (founders they've actually placed) or their actual investor relationships.
- Spray-and-pray approach — they'll blast your deck to a list, burning your name with investors.
- Asks for equity/fees far above market, or exclusivity with no performance.
✅ Good signs:
- Real, warm, relevant relationships (they can name the specific investors they'd introduce and why you fit).
- Selective — they only take companies they believe in.
- Transparent, market fee structure; success-weighted; references you can call.
- Adds credibility/signal, doesn't subtract it.
Fees (know the market, don't overpay)
- Placement agents commonly take a success fee (a % of the raise), sometimes
- a retainer; scouts/syndicates take carry (a share of upside), not cash from you. Get 2–3 comparisons; a legit party will explain the structure plainly. (Not legal/financial advice — have material terms reviewed.)
How to run it
- Prefer the positive-signal channels first: scouts, syndicates,
accelerators, operator angels. Find them via
warm-path-finderand yourinvestor-researchon funds (many list their scouts/programs). - Consider an FA only if the fit is right (stage/size/market gap) and it passes the vetting above.
- Vet hard: references, real relationships, fees, selectivity.
- Hand qualified intros to
warm-introfor the ask; track inpipeline-tracker.
Output
- A ranked shortlist of network-bringing channels that fit this founder's stage / geography / gap (positive-signal ones first).
- For any FA under consideration: a vetting verdict (red flags? references? fee sanity?) and a go/no-go.
- The honest call on whether an FA helps or hurts this raise's signal.
Bilingual / 中文
中文/跨境要点:优先 scout / 天使 syndicate / 加速器 / 操盘手天使(信号为正、自带 网络);FA(融资顾问)在美元募资里可能是负信号(VC 觉得你自己搞不到暖介绍), 纯后付费早期 FA 多为群发型、会烧你在投资人处的名声。FA 更适合:较大轮次、后期、 或你确实够不到的市场(如中国创始人融美元、需要一个真有关系的中介搭桥)。筛选看红旗: 预付费+模糊交付、"保证融到"、不给案例/关系、群发打法、费率离谱——占一条就走。
Refuse / push back when
- Asked to engage an FA showing clear red flags (upfront fee + no references + "guaranteed") → refuse and explain the risk; it costs money and can burn your name with investors.
- Asked to prioritize FAs over warm/scout/accelerator paths at pre-seed → flag the negative signal; exhaust the positive-signal channels first.