Vc scaffold
Skill vetcoders/vibecrafted/vibecrafted-core/vibecrafted_core/skills/vc-scaffold
Vibecrafted. - The Founders' Framework | A marbles gameboard inspired convergence based coding system for shipping software with Al agents.
npx -y skills add vetcoders/vibecrafted --skill vc-scaffoldAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Founder-first main brainstorm + planwriting — the armored lighthouse (pancerna latarnia) that carries a single cut, multiple cuts, or a whole project into the autonomous VC-ship pipeline. The WRITE entry of the read/write cadence: produces a measurable, self-sufficient plan a fleet executes with the operator absent mid-flight. This skill should be used when the user asks to "scaffold", "plan this", "architect this", "break this down", "I have an idea", "design the system", "vc-scaffold", "zaplanuj to", "rozrysuj architekturę", "mam pomysł".
SKILL.md
19.9 KB, ~4.8k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Invocation for
vc-scaffold(launcherscaffold)Same three-path shape as the fleet, with this skill's literals — see the canonical Delegation Matrix:
Path Literal for this skill 1. User-launched worker vibecrafted scaffold <agent>2. Interactive /vc-scaffold— execute in this session; use native subagents when required; do not externalize merely because a launcher exists3. Agent-operator may dispatch the worker form above via vc-dispatch/ operator lines while preserving this skill's identity
<!-- /fleet-imperative -->Freer native on some runs ≠ abandon external fleet.
vc-dispatchandvc-shipkeep their own identities.
vc-scaffold: Founder-First Planning — Pancerna Latarnia
What this is
Scaffold is the main brainstorm + planwriting surface: take a vague idea and produce
a scoped, measurable build plan. It scales across one gate: a single cut, multiple
cuts, or a whole project. It is the WRITE entry of the VC-ship read/write cadence —
the plan it emits must be self-sufficient and falsifiable because in autonomous delivery
the operator is absent mid-flight and sees only intermediate artifacts. Plan as if no one will
answer a question after dispatch. Front-load every decision here. See references/cadence.md.
The lighthouse orients before the fleet sails; the armor is the verification each cut carries.
Operator Entry
Living Tree / Worktree Rule
This workflow runs in the operator's current checkout and current branch. Do not create, switch to, or move execution into a git worktree unless the operator explicitly asks. Generic words like "isolate", "parallel", or "clean branch" are not enough. Re-read files before editing, adapt to concurrent changes, report a substrate failure if the tree is too poisoned to continue safely. See Living Tree Rule.
Dispatch
Enter the framework session, then launch through the command deck (not raw skills/.../*.sh):
vibecrafted start # or: vc-start
vibecrafted scaffold claude --prompt 'Design the payment system'
vc-scaffold agy --prompt 'Plan migration from NextAuth to custom auth'
vibecrafted scaffold codex --file /path/to/idea-brief.md
Prefer --file for an existing plan/artifact and --prompt for inline intent.
Canonical Orientation Gate (HARD-BLOCK — safety-critical)
Before any repo-specific analysis or planning, run or consume vc-init for the assigned repo.
This is not a polish step — it is a safety bezpiecznik. In autonomous VC-ship an agent that
composes from memory injects silent drift the operator cannot catch live. Therefore: no plan
until repo/runtime truth exists. Missing vc-init/Loctree evidence is a process failure, not a
warning.
Loctree:loctree is the default structural perception. Use it before grep or docs-driven claims
to produce or refresh the Code-Derived Application Map:
repo-view, focus, slice (before edit), impact (before delete), find / find --literal
(before create), follow (dead/cycles/twins/hotspots). Find load-bearing hubs, twins, dead code,
drift, runtime entrypoints, blast-radius traps. If the task is explicitly non-repo/greenfield,
declare the no-repo exception in the report and name the orientation source used instead.
Repository Work Doctrine
For repository work, start with Loctree as the map: use loct context,
loct occurrences, loct body, and loct find --literal before broad manual
search. Use AICX for intent and session context. Use rg/grep as fallback or
local magnifier, not as a replacement for structural mapping. If Loctree fails
or misses a surface, append feedback to ~/.vibecrafted/loctree/loctree-fail.md.
Pipeline Position
[SCAFFOLD] → init → implement → review → workflow → followup → marbles → audit → polarize → dou → hydrate → release
^^^^^^^^^^ WRITE entry of the read/write cadence (WRITE produces an artifact, READ falsifies it)
Scaffold is the WRITE entry. If the task is already clear and bounded, skip scaffold and start at
vc-init. The full cadence and the WRITE/READ classification live in references/cadence.md.
The Six Phases
Run these in order. Each phase produces the input the next consumes. Phases 5–6 are the delivery mechanism: every cut gets a brief (hard-gate) and the artifacts are served for operator review — not narrated as prose and not gated on the agent's good intentions.
1. Orient (research-first)
Pass the Canonical Orientation Gate above. Map the existing landscape: repo-view for size/health,
focus on suspect modules, slice critical files, tree for hotspots, follow for dead/cycles.
Capture the constraint space — tech (stack/versions/infra), team (who builds, which languages),
business (time budget, deadline), scope (MVP vs full vision). Constraints shape everything.
2. Falsify (adversarial premise check)
Before committing to a shape, try to break the founding assumption. Ask "how would I know this is a lie?" The 0-byte-passes-exit-0 lesson: every "it works" must survive a real probe, never a green checkmark alone. Surface the failure modes the plan must defend against.
3. Shape (scale-adaptive)
Decide architecture by boundaries and decisions (3-5 that matter, not a thousand details), set
scope (in / out / explicitly out — be ruthless), and define product identity (material
metaphor, color roles, typography, tone, dark/light) — identity is an architectural decision that
feeds DoU and Decorate later. Then pick the output shape by scale: single-cut brief · wave-atlas+tracker · project read/write pipeline. See references/output-shapes.md.
4. Defend (gates first-class)
Break work into agent-sized cuts (30-120 min). Every cut carries the measure-core: a Vector
(stabilize/implement/recon/e2e), the four-term delta (intent | baseline | claim | delivery), a
state marker [ ] [~] [?] [!] [x], and a delivery-verifier — the non-fakeable test that flips
[~]→[x]. A cut without a verifier ships as [?], never [x]. See references/measure-core.md.
5. Brief every cut (HARD-GATE — this is the delivery mechanism)
Produce the plan from references/plan-template.md (master-dispatch: wave atlas + dependency
graph + the state column). Then — non-negotiable — render a brief for EVERY cut. A cut
without a rendered, well-formed brief does not exist as far as the plan is concerned. This is the
rule that turns a plan from a shell (wydmuszka) into something a fleet can execute.
For each cut, write briefs/<wave>-<slot>_<slug>.md from the 12-section dispatch template
(references/output-shapes.md): mission · context · files · acceptance · gates · out-of-scope ·
Living Tree etiquette (verbatim) · Loctree-first · recovery hint · branch+commit · report path.
Enforcement (ported from /brainstorming, the flow that leads the agent by the hand):
- Checklist→TODOs: create one TodoWrite item per cut-brief; complete them in order. The scaffold is not "done" while any cut-brief todo is open.
- Hard-gate: do NOT hand off to
vc-operator, dispatch, or claim the scaffold complete until EVERY cut in the wave atlas has a matching brief with all 12 sections present. - Loop to green: missing or malformed brief → loop back and render it. Single terminal state: all briefs rendered AND the scaffold-doctor gate passes.
- Anti-pattern pre-emption (FORBIDDEN rationalizations): "this cut is too small to need a brief", "we are 1:1 so no briefs needed", "the master-dispatch table is enough". A plan without per-cut briefs is a shell, not a plan. No exceptions, regardless of perceived simplicity.
5.5 DRIVER.md (HARD-GATE — the operator's hand-off driver)
Alongside the briefs, render one DRIVER.md co-located with briefs/. It is the single
self-sufficient artifact a human operator (or a cold fleet) drives the whole plan from when the
in-thread loop dies. NOT optional, NOT a re-skin of the atlas — it is the executable hand-off.
It MUST contain all five:
- Full absolute paths — every plan artifact, brief, orient evidence, and input/fixture, as copy-pasteable absolute paths.
- Dependency graph WITH a
whyon every edge — what-after-what AND why: why each cut precedes the next; why a pair is SEQUENCE (shared file domain → Living Tree conflict) vs PARALLEL (disjoint domains → safe concurrent); and where every ⛔ operator-button STOP sits (push/merge, product decisions). A graph withoutwhyis a diagram, not a driver. - Ready commands — the exact launcher line for the next stage (e.g.
vibecrafted implement <agent> --file <brief>, never a fake generic skill name) for EVERY remaining cut, in dispatch order, tagged SEQUENCE / PARALLEL / STOP, each followed by its per-cut verify command. A human pastes these verbatim if the loop fails. - The state alphabet + the
[ ]→[x]rule, reproduced verbatim (mirrors Measurement):[ ]todo ·[~]running ·[?]done-unverified ·[!]blocked ·[x]verifier-green. Only a delivery-verifier flips[~]→[x]; an agent's claim NEVER reaches[x]on its own. The rule lives IN the DRIVER on purpose — so that mid-dispatch nobody promotes a claim to done without re-running the verifier. That promotion-without-proof is the single failure mode that wrecks an operator run ("się zajebiemy"). Encode it where the dispatcher's eyes are. - Live status snapshot +
dou-index = |[x]| / total.
5.6 manifest.json (HARD-GATE — canonical artifact inventory)
Create one plan root at
~/.vibecrafted/artifacts/<org>/<repo>/<YYYY_MMDD>/plans/<plan_id>/ and write
manifest.json there as mandatory output. Schema version "1" declares plan_id, org, repo,
day, and an ordered artifacts array. Every artifact entry declares a stable id, explicit
role, relative path, editable, and required; optional dependencies contain artifact IDs.
Supported roles are driver, wave-atlas, brief, design-doc, traceability, tracker,
falsification, report, and other. Register every generated artifact before handoff. Filenames
never imply roles. Do not create an operator/ mirror, compatibility copy, naming alias, or symlink.
5.7 YAML frontmatter on EVERY artifact (HARD-GATE — no bare markdown)
Every markdown artifact this skill produces — MISSION, ATLAS, DRIVER, tracker, falsification, every brief, every design doc — opens with YAML frontmatter, no exceptions:
---
plan_id: <plan_id>
run_id: <scaffold run id, when running under a lifecycle>
session_id: <agent session_id from `aicx sessions current` or raw `.jsonl` filename read>
role: driver | wave-atlas | brief | tracker | falsification | design-doc | mission | other
agent: <author agent>
date: YYYY-MM-DD
project: <org>/<repo>
---
Why this is a hard-gate, not decoration: the settlement contract's rule 6 ("no bare markdown — artifact without run_id lands as needs-attention"), retrieval (search/index engines rank and scope by these fields), and provenance (an artifact found loose on disk must identify its plan and author without archaeology). A plan package with bare-markdown members fails scaffold review the same way a missing brief does. Operator flagged this live 2026-07-23 after receiving a package with frontmatter on some members and none on others — mixed is worse than missing, because it teaches readers to stop checking.
6. Serve & review (editable artifacts via vibecrafted-server)
The plan + briefs are editable artifacts, not a wall of inline questions. The flow is:
research → present findings + effort estimate → propose the first cut/wave shape → render the
briefs → serve them for operator review through vibecrafted-server (the natural home of this
phase's tooling: it reads the typed control-plane contract and renders the wave atlas + briefs as a
multi-tab, editable HTML surface — one tab per artifact (atlas · each brief · each design doc),
edited in place). The operator steers by editing the rendered plan in the browser, not by answering
twenty questions mid-scaffold. Refine WITH the operator on the served artifacts.
Transplant the surface — do not reinvent it. Proven sources to lift from: ../pensieve
(multi-tab editable workspace dashboard), ../unicode-puzzles-portal (portal generators), and
/brainstorming's visual-companion (proven HTML mockup/diagram generators). The server-review tab
must be multi-tab + editable from day one, not a static dump.
scaffold-doctor (the gate, machine-checked): a deterministic validator in
vibecrafted-server/control-core that loads the same typed manifest.json used by the server and
refuses the scaffold→implement baton until: the manifest identity matches its canonical plan root;
all declared required artifacts exist; IDs and paths are unique; dependencies resolve; editable
paths are non-symlinked and remain inside the plan root; briefs on disk are declared; and the atlas
has a wave atlas + dependency graph; every cut has a briefs/<wave>-<slot>_<slug>.md with all 12
sections; acceptance bullets are atomic + verifier-backed; a design doc exists for every cut flagged
needs_design; a DRIVER.md exists and carries all five (full paths · why-annotated graph ·
ready commands · the [ ]→[x] rule verbatim · status snapshot). The gate is machine-checked, not
agent-promised — it is the same artifact-as-truth gate the async runtime uses between every
read-write cadence handoff.
Measurement (the armor)
Every plan unit is claim/outcome-addressable. Only a verifier flips [~]→[x]; a claim never
reaches [x] on its own — that invariant is what makes the plan measurable instead of optimistic.
dou-index = |[x]| / total; delta = {[ ],[~],[?],[!]}; trigger/stop reads the state column
([!]/[?] → STOP → recovery-vector; full [x] wave → TRIGGER next). STOP is never surrender —
it triggers a recovery-vector (fallback/failover/handsoff). Full alphabet + markers:
references/measure-core.md.
Critical Rules
- Research-first is hard-block, not polish. No plan from memory; derive from repo/runtime truth.
- A brief for every cut — no exceptions. Per-cut briefs are the hard-gate (Phase 5). A plan whose cuts lack briefs is a shell; the scaffold-doctor refuses to hand it off.
- A DRIVER.md — no exceptions (Phase 5.5). The operator hand-off driver (full paths · why-annotated
graph · ready commands · the
[ ]→[x]rule verbatim · status snapshot) is part of the scaffold-doctor gate. A plan a human can't drive from one file when the loop dies is not handoff-ready. - Durable artifacts NEVER go to
/tmp./tmpis ephemeral scratch only — it is wiped, untracked, and invisible to the operator's tooling and sync. Every plan, brief, DRIVER, tracker, journal, report, and design doc lands in the canonical plan root:~/.vibecrafted/artifacts/<org>/<repo>/<DATE>/plans/<plan_id>/(mirrors the reports layout). Writing a durable artifact to/tmpis a process failure, not a shortcut. - manifest.json is mandatory. It is the only artifact inventory and role contract. No
operator/mirror, duplicate, filename-role inference, or compatibility symlink may become a second writable truth. - Serve, don't interrogate. Render editable artifacts and review them through
vibecrafted-server; the operator edits the plan, not answers twenty mid-scaffold questions. - Measure, don't claim. A cut is done when its verifier is green, never when an agent says so.
- Map before designing. Respect the grain of the existing system; loctree before assumptions.
- Scope is your best friend. Tight scope + great execution beats loose scope every time.
- Write for an absent operator. The artifact speaks for itself; the next READ falsifies it without a human on the other side.
- Keep dependencies shallow. Prefer independent workstreams; sequential A→B→C kills parallelism.
- No premature optimization / no invented patterns. The best architecture is the one that ships.
What Success Looks Like
- A cold fleet (or human) executes the plan without asking a question mid-flight.
- Every cut has a
Vectorand adelivery-verifier; thestatecolumn is machine-readable. - Scope boundaries are crystal clear; 3-5 architectural decisions explicit with trade-offs.
- The plan survives an absent operator:
[x]is earned,[?]is honest, nothing is faked.
Cross-References
- vc-init — bootstraps agent context after scaffolding (the orientation gate).
- vc-implement / vc-workflow — ship WRITE phases that consume scaffold plans. vc-justdo — standalone posture (prompt-typed; not implement).
- vc-review · vc-followup · vc-audit · vc-dou — the READ phases that falsify each WRITE artifact.
- vc-operator — reads the plan's
statecolumn and conducts the dispatch (trigger/stop). - vc-research — triple-agent research for unknowns found during Orient/Falsify.
Anti-Patterns
- Planning before the orientation gate (composing architecture from memory = silent drift).
- A 50-page design doc instead of a sharp, measurable plan.
- Prose instead of a
statecolumn — the operator can't trigger/stop on prose. - Treating an agent's
[~]claim as[x]without a verifier (the optimism trap). - STOP-as-surrender (502-and-die) instead of STOP-as-recovery-vector.
- Breaking all work into sequential dependencies; skipping product identity.
Additional Resources
references/measure-core.md—[ ][~][?][!][x]alphabet, invariant, Vector→Δ, marker taxonomy.references/cadence.md— VC-ship read/write cadence (order, WRITE/READ, handoff, planning rules).references/output-shapes.md— the three scale shapes + 12-section dispatch template + tracker.references/plan-template.md— the SCAFFOLD.md output format (now with Vector + state + verifier).
Verification carries into the prompt
Delivery-proof semantics live in vibecrafted_core.delivery; see
docs/runtime/DELIVERY_PROOF_KERNEL_v1.md.
Every prompt this skill composes must carry the Verification Rule into the worker's dispatch: walk-around verification (gates green ≠ works) + loct literal-vs-semantic. See vc-operator/DISPATCH_TEMPLATE.md Sections 6 + 9.
𝚅𝚒𝚋𝚎𝚌𝚛𝚊𝚏𝚝𝚎𝚍. with AI Agents by Vetcoders (c)2024-2026 LibraxisAI
What ships with it: 9 files
30.9 KB alongside SKILL.md
.claude-plugin/
- plugin.json261 B
agents/
- openai.yaml414 B
plans/
- 01-integrate-agy-junie-scaffold.md3.9 KB
- HOWTO.md10.6 KB
references/
- cadence.md2.3 KB
- measure-core.md3.9 KB
- output-shapes.md3.0 KB
- plan-template.md4.3 KB
- FLOW.md2.3 KB