Product discovery coach
Skill varunk130/claude-code-skills/skills/product-management/product-discovery-coach
A curated, categorized library of 29 production-grade Claude Code custom skills across finance, product, strategy, game theory, and document processing.
npx -y skills add varunk130/claude-code-skills --skill product-discovery-coachAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Coaches a product trio through continuous product discovery: weekly customer touchpoints, assumption mapping, story mapping, and the discovery / delivery dual-track cadence. Use when standing up a discovery practice from scratch, debugging why discovery isn't sticking, training a new product manager on continuous discovery, or designing a quarterly discovery plan around an outcome.
SKILL.md
6.1 KB, ~1.2k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Product Discovery Coach
The operating system for a product trio that wants continuous discovery, not occasional research.
What this skill is
A coaching workflow that diagnoses where a product team is in its discovery maturity and produces concrete next-step practices: interview cadence, assumption mapping, story mapping, Opportunity Solution Trees (OSTs), and the discovery / delivery dual-track. Includes the rituals (weekly trio meetings, monthly assumption tests, quarterly outcome resets) that make discovery stick.
What it solves
- "Discovery" that means a one-off project, not a continuous practice
- Roadmaps where the product manager does the thinking and the trio only executes
- Customer interviews scheduled for "when there's time" (i.e., never)
- Assumption tests that have no kill criteria
- Discovery work that doesn't ladder up to a business outcome
When to invoke
- Standing up a discovery practice from scratch
- Diagnosing why an existing discovery effort isn't producing decisions
- Coaching a new product manager on what good discovery looks like
- Designing the discovery half of a quarterly plan
- Aligning product, design, and engineering on a shared trio operating model
Phase 1: Diagnose discovery maturity
Score the team 1-5 on each:
| Practice | 1 | 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Weekly customer touchpoints | None | Every product manager, designer, and engineer talks to customers weekly |
| Outcome ownership | Objectives and Key Results (OKRs) set top-down by leadership | Trio owns outcome and adjusts approach |
| Assumption testing | Builds first | Tests highest-risk assumption first |
| Story mapping | Backlog list | Visual map with releases |
| Opportunity Solution Tree (OST) | None | Living, updated weekly |
| Discovery / delivery cadence | Sequential | Dual-track parallel |
Identify the single weakest dimension - that is the focus for the next 90 days.
Phase 2: Install the weekly trio cadence
The trio (product manager plus designer plus tech lead) meets weekly for 90 minutes:
- 15 minutes - outcome status (metric trend, leading indicators)
- 30 minutes - review interviews from last week, update opportunities
- 30 minutes - assumption tests in flight; design next test
- 15 minutes - story map updates and next-week commitments
No status updates. No backlog grooming. This is the discovery operating ritual.
Phase 3: Continuous interview cadence
Target: 3 customer touchpoints per week minimum, including product manager, designer, and one engineer rotated.
Interview pipeline:
- Recruiting via existing customer pool, support tickets, Ideal Customer Profile (ICP) outreach, intercept on the product
- Standing 30-minute slots on calendars
- Lightweight, semi-structured guide focused on the current opportunity
- Recording (with consent) → transcript → coded in shared library
Anti-pattern: the product manager is the only one interviewing. Discovery does not transfer through readouts.
Phase 4: Assumption mapping
For each candidate solution, list assumptions across:
- Value risk
- Usability risk
- Feasibility risk
- Business viability risk
Plot on a 2-by-2 of importance × evidence. The top-right quadrant (high importance, low evidence) is what gets tested first.
Test design template:
We believe [assumption]. To verify, we'll [method] with [population]. We'll know it's true if [success criteria] and false if [kill criteria].
Methods, cheapest first: survey, fake-door experiment, prototype walkthrough, concierge Minimum Viable Product (MVP), A/B test, full build.
Phase 5: Story mapping
For prioritized opportunities, build a story map:
- Horizontal axis: the customer's journey (steps in order)
- Vertical axis: necessity (must-have at top, nice-to-have below)
- Releases drawn as horizontal slices
Story mapping reveals:
- The narrative spine (what's the customer doing?)
- The thinnest viable release
- Future releases without committing them
Phase 6: Discovery / delivery dual track
Set up two parallel tracks:
| Track | Owns | Cadence | Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery | Trio | Continuous, weekly | Tested opportunities, validated solution shape |
| Delivery | Engineering plus design | Sprint or continuous deployment | Shipped releases tied to validated solution |
Solutions move from discovery → delivery only after the top assumption tests pass. No "we'll figure it out in build."
Phase 7: Quarterly outcome reset
At quarter end:
- Review outcome metric movement versus target
- Inspect the OST: which branches were pursued, which pruned, which abandoned?
- Conduct a discovery retrospective: what cadences slipped? what evidence is weakest?
- Reset the outcome for the next quarter (often the same; sometimes a sub-component)
Output
- Discovery maturity score with weakest-dimension focus
- Weekly trio agenda template
- Interview cadence plan with recruiting source and quota
- Assumption map per candidate solution with prioritized tests
- Story map for the active opportunity
- Discovery / delivery cadence visualization
- Quarterly outcome reset template
Operating rules
Always
- Treat discovery as continuous, not project-based
- Have engineers and designers interview customers, not only the product manager
- Test the highest-risk assumption first
- Define kill criteria before running a test
- Make the trio meeting a non-negotiable weekly ritual
Never
- Skip customer touchpoints because "we're busy shipping"
- Build before testing the highest-risk value assumption
- Run an assumption test without a written kill criterion
- Confuse roadmap planning with discovery
- Let the product manager be the sole conduit of customer knowledge
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.