Supplier qualification
Skill spiralcrew-ou/profilespider-agent-skills/supplier-qualification
24 free SKILL.md skills for Claude Code & compatible agents: qualify leads, research companies, clean lists.
npx -y skills add spiralcrew-ou/profilespider-agent-skills --skill supplier-qualificationAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 6 stars6 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Assesses potential suppliers against defined commercial, operational, and compliance requirements. Use when the user provides supplier records plus sourcing requirements and wants a consistent shortlist with strengths and risks.
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
2.2 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Supplier Qualification
Purpose
Assess potential suppliers against defined commercial, operational, and compliance requirements.
When to use this skill
- Shortlisting suppliers from a sourcing long-list
- Comparing vendors against the same requirements
- Surfacing compliance or location risks early
- Documenting why a supplier is in or out
When not to use this skill
- You have no defined requirements or risk criteria
- You need audited financials the records do not contain
- Final selection requires legal or compliance sign-off this cannot replace
Required inputs
- Supplier records
- Product or service requirements
- Risk and compliance criteria
Optional inputs
- Location requirements
- Capacity or volume needs
- Certifications required
- Budget or pricing band
Rules
- Score only against the supplied requirements.
- Use evidence from the records; do not assume certifications or capacity.
- Distinguish stated facts from inferences.
- Flag compliance-relevant gaps explicitly.
- Apply criteria consistently to every supplier.
Process
- Parse requirements and risk criteria.
- Evaluate each supplier against them.
- Identify strengths and risks with evidence.
- Score fit from 0 to 100.
- List missing information and recommend a next step.
Output format
Return one record per supplier with the following fields:
- supplier_fit_score
- strengths
- risks
- missing_information
- recommended_next_step
Validation
- Confirm risks and strengths cite record evidence.
- Confirm compliance gaps are surfaced, not assumed away.
- Confirm scores are comparable across suppliers.
Limitations
- A record-based screen is not due diligence; verify before contracting.
- Certifications listed in data should be independently confirmed.