agentsclimarketplace

Essay

Skill serejaris/kimi-skills/skills/general-writing/essay

Полная коллекция скиллов Kimi (267 built-in + 7 plugin skills), выгруженная из сандбокса агента

Install
npx -y skills add serejaris/kimi-skills --skill essay

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

2 things to look at

  • 19 days oldThe repository was created 19 days ago. New is not bad, but a brand new repository carrying a familiar-sounding name is the shape a typosquat arrives in, and there has been no time for anyone else to find a problem with it.
  • 4 stars4 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Essay and prose writing — personal essays, literary essays, argumentative essays, 随笔, 杂文, and other non-fiction prose that prioritizes voice, thought, and style over formal structure. Distinguished from reports (data-driven) and papers (academic rigor).

SKILL.md

10.2 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Essay Writing

Orchestrator dispatches all creation and review work to subagents. Before creation, copy user-uploaded files to /mnt/agents/output/research/.

Sub-skill of general-writing. Inherits shared creative writing principles, anti-AI discipline, and quality gate framework.

CRITICAL — Review → Fix Brief → Dispatched Subagent: When a review finds issues, translate them into a detailed fix brief (file paths, quoted findings, expected outcome, scope boundary, self-check) and dispatch a fresh essay_writer subagent to apply the fix. Never use inline sed/edit_file fixes.

CRITICAL — Anti-Read-Loop Rule: The orchestrator must dispatch its first subagent (essay_writer) within 10 iterations. If the orchestrator has spent 10+ iterations only reading files without creating any subagent, it is in a read-loop. Stop reading, draft your conception from what you have, and dispatch the writer immediately.

CRITICAL — .docx Delivery: Every completed essay must be converted to .docx using skills/docx/SKILL.md. Never end a session with raw .md files and no .docx deliverable.

File Paths

Output: /mnt/agents/output/
  {project_name}.essay.md               # Final essay
  research/                              # User uploads (source material, references)

Trigger Keywords

散文, 随笔, essay, personal essay, 杂文, prose, 小品文, 议论文, 抒情散文, 叙事散文, op-ed, 评论, commentary, reflection, thought leadership, 洞见, insight essay, 公众号文章, 小红书


Workflow Decision Tree

User Query
  │
  ├─ Provides draft + asks for revision → Stage 3 → Stage 4
  ├─ Specifies type/theme clearly → Stage 1 → Stage 2 → Stage 3 → Stage 4
  └─ Vague request → Infer parameters (see below) → Stage 1 → Stage 2 → Stage 3 → Stage 4

Infer essay type, audience, platform, length, and language from the user's request. The orchestrator analyzes and infers all parameters autonomously; for complex requests, deploy a subagent to analyze requirements in depth. Never prompt the user for clarification.


Stage 1: Conception (Orchestrator — no subagents)

The Orchestrator designs the essay structure directly. Do not delegate this.

1.1 Identify the Central Claim

Not the topic — the claim. One sentence: what does this essay argue or reveal?

1.2 Find "The Turn"

The moment where thinking deepens or complicates. Identify explicitly: what does the reader believe before? What do they understand after? For insight essays: this is the cognitive gap — "Many think X, but the evidence points to Y."

1.3 Determine Voice

Record: formality (conversational / measured / formal / literary), use of "I" (frequent / occasional / rare), humor (none / dry wit / satirical / self-deprecating), rhythm (short-punchy / long-flowing / varied), critical intensity (observer / commentator / provocateur).

1.4 Choose Structure

For insight/thought-leadership essays (Chinese tradition):

  1. 破题 — Reframe the topic so the reader sees it fresh
  2. 拆解 — Pull the topic apart; reveal hidden mechanisms
  3. 破局 — The insight itself; the "turn" at maximum intensity
  4. 升华 — Lift the specific insight to a broader principle

For personal/narrative essays:

  • Hook → Setup → Complication → The Turn → Landing (resonant close, not summary)

For thought leadership: additionally plan content mix —

TypeSharePurpose
Data-driven analysis40%Anchor in evidence
Tactical frameworks30%Actionable mental models
Contrarian takes20%Challenge received wisdom
Personal narrative10%Selective vulnerability

Identify 2-3 candidate concluding aphorisms using concrete structures: (1) Juxtaposition — three escalating levels: "X改变结果, Y改变原因, Z改变模型"; (2) Contrast — negate + affirm: "不是A, 而是B"; (3) Causal loop — "A导致B, B导致C, C加剧A"; (4) Negation flip — "XXX的本质, 其实不是…而是…" Pick structure before drafting; test by reading aloud.

1.5 Outline

For short essays (< 3k words): Save a single outline to /mnt/agents/output/{filename}.agent.outline.md. Include: central claim, the turn, voice profile, structural arc, platform conventions (if any).

For long essays (>= 3k words): Two-phase outline process:

  1. Structural outline — Central claim, the turn, section purposes, and overall arc. Save to /mnt/agents/output/{filename}.agent.outline.md.
  2. Per-section detail outline — For each section: the section's argument, key evidence or examples, transitions into and out of the section, and target word count. Append to the same outline file.

Stage 2: Writing — Single Subagent (mandatory)

Voice unity is paramount. One writer for the entire essay. Never split.

For multi-section essays: strictly one section per task call. Single writer mandatory for voice unity — reuse the same essay_writer subagent.

Create essay_writer

create_subagent:

  • name: "essay_writer"
  • system_prompt: Inline all of the following — (1) Voice profile (from Stage 1) — be specific: "conversational, dry wit, varied rhythm with short declaratives after long analytical passages, frequent first-person, provocateur stance." (2) Anti-AI rules — read ../anti-ai.md and inline full content. CRITICAL for essays. Emphasize: no throat-clearing, no summarizing endings, no transition chains, no soulless neutrality, no copula avoidance, no significance inflation. Chinese essays: "形散神不散." (3) Platform conventions if targeting a venue (see Platform Variants below).
  • description: "Write essay with consistent voice"

Dispatch via task

task:

  • agent: "essay_writer"
  • prompt content:
  • The outline (full text, not path)
  • Central claim and "the turn" specification
  • For insight essays: the 4-part arc (破题→拆解→破局→升华) and the cognitive gap
  • For thought leadership: content mix targets and aphorism candidates
  • Word count target
  • Audience description
  • Output path: /mnt/agents/output/{filename}_sec{NN}.md

Word Count Verification

After each completed section, orchestrator runs:

python skills/general-writing/scripts/check_wordcount.py <file> --min {target} --lang auto

If FAIL, return to writer with expansion instructions.


Stage 3: Review

Step 1: Shared Pipeline

Read ../review.md and run the shared review pipeline. For single-section essays, continuity_editor is skipped; run style_editor and structural_editor.

Step 2: Genre-Specific Editor — voice_editor

create_subagent:

  • name: "voice_editor"
  • system_prompt: "You are a voice editor for essays. The cover test: remove the byline — would you know a human wrote this? Check: (1) voice distinctiveness, (2) opinions and risk-taking, (3) AI-pattern scan, (4) rhythm variety, (5) authenticity (mixed feelings, imperfection). Output: score 0-100 for voice distinctiveness + PASS/FAIL + line-level feedback."
  • description: "Voice distinctiveness and authenticity review"

task:

  • agent: "voice_editor"
  • prompt: Include essay file path, anti-AI rules (from ../anti-ai.md), voice profile from Stage 1.

Scoring:

DimensionWeightWhat to Check
Voice distinctiveness25%Sounds like a specific person?
Central insight clarity25%Reader can state "the point"?
Structural arc20%Hook, turn, resonant landing?
Argument quality15%Logic, evidence, emotional honesty?
Craft and editing15%AI-pattern absence, rhythm, transitions?

Pass: >= 75 overall. Voice distinctiveness must be >= 70.

On FAIL: remediation brief → dispatch a fresh essay_writer subagent to apply the fix → re-review. Max 2 cycles. If still failing after 2 cycles, deliver with annotated issues for the user.


Stage 4: Delivery

Assemble

For multi-section essays, concatenate all section files in order. Save to /mnt/agents/output/{filename}.agent.final.md.

Convert to .docx

Convert the assembled markdown to Word using the md2docx pipeline (see skills/docx/SKILL.mdreferences/md2docx-reference.md).

Output: /mnt/agents/output/{filename}.agent.final.docx

This step is mandatory. Raw .md without a .docx deliverable is not an acceptable end state.


Platform Variants

PlatformKey Conventions
微信公众号Insight first. Emotional hook in line 1. Bold key sentences. Short paragraphs (2-4 sentences).
小红书Ultra-short paragraphs (1-2 sentences). Emoji as rhythm (not decoration). "I" mandatory. Hook in first 2 lines. Anti-AI checklist: no "首先/其次/最后" structure, no "值得注意的是/综上所述", no uniform paragraph lengths, no missing emotional markers. Replace "赋能" → "帮", "值得注意的是" → "说真的". Post-write check: warm greeting opener? personal voice? sentence length varied? interaction CTA at end?
Blog / NewsletterSEO-aware title. Skimmable (H2/H3, pull quotes, bold). 2000-5000 words. Author bio.
Literary MagazinePure voice — no SEO, no hooks. Sentence-level craft. Ambiguity welcome.

Reference Files

FilePurposeWhen to ReadWho Runs
../anti-ai.mdAI patterns to avoid — inline into essay_writer system promptBefore Stage 2Orchestrator inlines into subagent
../review.mdShared review pipeline, editor definitions, quality gatesBefore Stage 3Orchestrator follows
../SKILL.mdParent skill — shared principles, routing, file namingOn entryOrchestrator reads
../scripts/check_wordcount.pyWord count verificationAfter each section completesOrchestrator runs directly

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.