1.0.0

foxglove

The remote/web visualization tool for robium: foxglove_bridge exposes a live ROS 2 graph over a WebSocket, and the Foxglove app (desktop or app.foxglove.dev in a browser) connects to it or opens a recorded MCAP file — the answer environments and gazebo route to whenever a robot or sim runs headless/remote and RViz2's local-display requirement doesn't fit. Two things changed over time and matter for how this skill is used: the bridge itself (foxglove_bridge, MIT-licensed, open source) moved its active development from foxglove/ros-foxglove-bridge (now ROS 1-only, maintenance mode) to the foxglove/foxglove-sdk monorepo, and the app that used to be free/open-source "Foxglove Studio" was discontinued in February 2024 (last open-source release v1.87.0, MPL-2.0) in favor of the current closed-source, commercial "Foxglove" 2.x app — which does still ship a free tier the product page states is "free forever" for local/live visualization, separate from its paid Data Platform/cloud features. The bridge migration was confirmed via direct fetch of the foxglove/ros-foxglove-bridge and foxglove/foxglove-sdk GitHub repos this session; the free-tier claim was confirmed via direct fetch of foxglove.dev's pricing page, while the Studio-to-2.x licensing history was reconstructed via search-synthesis after the source blog post 404'd on direct fetch (see References) — re-verify before repeating either claim, since licensing terms are exactly the kind of thing that drifts.

When to use this skill

• Setting up foxglove_bridge on a robot or sim host, building a layout, recording or replaying an MCAP file, or viewing a robot's data from a machine that isn't the robot itself.
• The trigger phrases in the description: 'foxglove', 'mcap', visualizing a robot running on a remote server, sharing visualization with others, recording sessions for later analysis.
• Any time environments or gazebo has already concluded the target is headless/remote and the next question is "how do I actually see it" — this skill is that answer.
• Cross-references — go to the sibling skill instead when the question is:
  • Whether headless/remote is the deployment target at all, GPU passthrough, or the general local-vs-remote strategy → environments (load first if not already decided; this skill assumes that decision is made and just delivers the viz half of it).
  • Local desktop ROS debugging with a display attached → rviz2.
  • ML/data-centric logging outside ROS message types (policy rollouts, LeRobot episodes) → rerun.
  • Choosing which viz tool fits the situation at all → visualization (routes here once Foxglove is the right choice).

Key directives

• Delegation posture: embed + links. The core mechanics this skill exists for — bridging a robot, recording MCAP, connecting the app remotely — are embedded here because that's the whole reason environments and gazebo point at this skill by name; anything beyond that (panel-by-panel layout editing, the full MCAP CLI, Data Platform cloud features) is a link out to Foxglove's own docs, not re-typed here.
• The bridge runs on the robot/server; the app runs wherever the viewer is. These are two different machines in the remote case, and mixing them up is the most common setup mistake — foxglove_bridge is a ROS 2 node that must be launched on the robot or sim host (it needs access to the ROS graph), while the Foxglove app connects to it from wherever a human is looking, local or remote. See Quick start and Usage patterns.
• Never re-teach the local-vs-remote/headless decision itself. That decision — and the general "don't default to X11 forwarding" guidance — belongs to environments; this skill starts from "remote/headless is already the answer" and only covers the Foxglove-specific mechanics of acting on it.
• Don't expose the bridge's WebSocket port to the open internet. foxglove_bridge has no built-in authentication — reach it over a VPN, SSH tunnel, or private network, the same way any other unauthenticated service on a robot would be secured, not by opening the port publicly. See Platform gotchas.
• Never write foxglove_bridge's supported-distro list or the app's licensing/pricing terms from memory. Both have changed — the bridge's home repo moved, and the app went from open-source to a closed-source product with a free tier — verify against index.ros.org's foxglove_bridge package page and foxglove.dev's own site before repeating either claim in a real project.

Quick start

1. Install and launch the bridge on the robot/sim host (verified via index.ros.org's foxglove_bridge package page this session: v3.4.2, MIT license, released for Humble, Jazzy, Kilted, Lyrical, and Rolling — no distro gap the way Nav2 has):

sudo apt install ros-$ROS_DISTRO-foxglove-bridge
ros2 launch foxglove_bridge foxglove_bridge_launch.xml

This starts a WebSocket server on port 8765 (default) that auto-discovers and exposes every topic currently on the ROS graph.

2. Connect the Foxglove app. Open the desktop app or app.foxglove.dev in a browser, and add a connection: ws://localhost:8765 if the app runs on the same machine as the bridge, or ws://<ROBOT_IP>:8765 over a VPN/tunnel for a remote view (see Platform gotchas — don't expose this port directly to the internet).

3. Save a layout once panels are arranged the way a given task needs (3D view + a couple of plots + raw topic panels is a common start), so the next session reopens the same view instead of rebuilding it.

Usage patterns

Bridge a live robot. Launch foxglove_bridge on the robot/server as in Quick start, then connect from the app. All ROS 2 topics are exposed automatically — no per-topic bridge configuration needed for the common case; the bridge's own parameters (address, port, topic allow/deny lists) are set as ROS 2 launch arguments if the defaults need narrowing (e.g. excluding a high-bandwidth topic from remote viewing).

Record MCAP. MCAP is ROS 2's default bag storage format as of recent distros, so the standard ros2 bag record path already writes it:

ros2 bag record -a -s mcap -o my_session

(-a records all topics; scope to specific topic names instead for a large graph.) The resulting .mcap file opens directly in the Foxglove app — drag it onto the window, or File > Open Local File — for offline playback and scrubbing, no bridge or live robot needed. This is the recording path the visualization umbrella's live-vs-recorded directive points at for ROS 2 data.

View remotely in the web app. Point app.foxglove.dev (no desktop install needed) at ws://<ROBOT_IP>:8765 over a VPN/SSH tunnel/tailnet — this is the answer environments' headless-first guidance and gazebo's headless-operation section both defer to: a teammate or a CI dashboard can watch a robot or sim running on a server with no display attached, using only a browser. The same connection works for a temporary SSH port-forward (ssh -L 8765:localhost:8765 robot-host) if a persistent VPN isn't set up for a one-off debugging session.

Platform gotchas

• No built-in auth on the bridge's WebSocket. Treat 8765 like any other unauthenticated robot service — reachable only over a VPN, SSH tunnel, or private network, never bound to a public interface.
• The desktop app and the web app (app.foxglove.dev) are the same product, different delivery — either works for the same live-bridge-or-MCAP-file workflow; the web app needs nothing installed and is the lower-friction choice for a teammate who just needs to look once.
• The bridge itself is open source (MIT); the app is not. Don't assume Foxglove's viewer code is inspectable/forkable the way it was under the old "Foxglove Studio" — that ended February 2024. The bridge running on the robot is unaffected by this; only the client app's license changed.
• A high topic/message rate can saturate a remote link. Over a slow or high-latency connection (a robot on cellular, a distant VPN hop), narrow the bridge to the topics actually needed for the session (bridge launch arguments, or a scoped ros2 bag record topic list) rather than streaming the full graph and fighting lag in the viewer.

Customization

• Different topic scope per session: override foxglove_bridge's launch arguments (e.g. an allow-list) when a remote link can't carry the full graph, rather than always bridging everything and filtering in the app — filtering upstream saves bandwidth, filtering in the app only saves screen space.
• Self-hosted vs. app.foxglove.dev: the web app is a hosted client pointed at whatever WebSocket URL is given to it — no project files here assume the hosted URL specifically; swap in a self-managed deployment if that's the team's policy, the connection mechanics (ws:// URL, VPN/ tunnel) are unchanged either way.
• Layouts per task: keep a saved layout per debugging task (nav debugging vs. sensor calibration vs. a demo view) the same way rviz2 keeps a config per task, rather than one layout trying to cover every use case.

References

• Upstream: Foxglove documentation (primary source for app/bridge usage), foxglove_bridge package page, index.ros.org (fetched directly this session — source of the distro-coverage and version/license facts above; re-check before a new install), foxglove/ foxglove-sdk (current home of bridge development; fetched directly this session), foxglove/ ros-foxglove-bridge (older repo, now ROS 1-only/maintenance — fetched directly this session, confirms the move), Foxglove pricing page and "Foxglove vs. Foxglove Studio: Two Years On" (source of the open-source-to-closed-source history above — the pricing page was fetched directly this session; the Studio-transition history was confirmed via search-synthesis of Foxglove's own blog posts and should be re-verified by reading that post directly before repeating the exact dates in a real project), MCAP format (fetched directly this session). Sibling skills: environments (headless/remote decision this skill assumes is already made), rviz2 (local desktop debugging), rerun (ML/data-centric logging), visualization (umbrella, routes here).

Changelog

<!-- One dated line per battle-tested change, added by skill-author hardening sessions. -->