agentsclimarketplace

Blitz

Skill renky1025/agent-skills/blitz

a kinds of skills can run in any agents, totally free.

Install
npx -y skills add renky1025/agent-skills --skill blitz

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 4 stars4 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Use when the user wants to learn a new topic quickly, understand a complex subject, study for an exam, prepare a learning plan, or use accelerated learning techniques. Trigger phrases: "learn fast", "blitz", "understand quickly", "study guide", "learning roadmap", "master [topic]", "spaced repetition", "active recall", "Feynman technique", "first principles".

SKILL.md

9.0 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Blitz — Universal Accelerated Learning Protocol

A 7-phase interactive protocol for learning any topic with maximum efficiency. Based on validated learning science: Feynman Technique, First-Principles Thinking, Active Recall, and Spaced Repetition.

The user invokes: /blitz <topic> [--phase=N]

  • Without --phase, run phases 1→7 in sequence.
  • With --phase=3, jump directly to Phase 3 (Active Recall Training).
  • With --phase=all, do a full pass through all phases.

Run each phase one at a time. Complete the phase, get user feedback, then proceed.


Phase 1 — Feynman Technique (Understand First)

Goal: Establish foundational understanding by explaining in simple terms.

  1. Teach the topic in simple language as if explaining to a complete beginner.

    • Use analogies, avoid jargon, keep it conversational.
    • Cover: What is it? Why does it matter? How does it work at a high level?
  2. Ask the user to explain it back in their own words.

    • Prompt: "Now explain this back to me in your own words. I'll point out gaps."
  3. Diagnose gaps. After their explanation, identify:

    • What they got right — reinforce it.
    • What they got wrong or omitted — clarify simply.
    • Areas where their explanation revealed confusion — re-teach those parts.
  4. Confirm understanding before moving on.

Sign off: "Phase 1 complete. Ready for first-principles breakdown? (y/n)"


Phase 2 — First-Principles Breakdown

Goal: Decompose the topic into irreducible components so the user understands essential logic instead of memorizing surface facts.

  1. Break it down:

    • What are the fundamental building blocks?
    • What axioms or invariants are true regardless of context?
    • Strip away conventions, tools, and implementation details — what's the core essence?
  2. Show the chain of reasoning — build up from first principles to the full topic, step by step.

  3. Ask: "Does any link in this chain feel unclear or unmotivated?"

    • Address each confusion by decomposing further.
  4. Cross-check understanding — ask one re-framing question that forces the user to reason from first principles:

    • "Based on these fundamentals, what do you think happens when X changes?"

Sign off: "Phase 2 complete. Ready for active recall training? (y/n)"


Phase 3 — Active Recall Training

Goal: Force retrieval of information without notes, then evaluate and correct.

  1. Warn the user: "This is retrieval practice — answer without looking at notes. Being wrong is productive."

  2. Ask 3–5 hard questions that force the user to retrieve and apply knowledge:

    • Mix of: factual recall, application, synthesis, "what if" scenarios.
    • Questions increase in difficulty.
  3. For each answer:

    • Praise what's correct.
    • Correct errors with specific, constructive feedback.
    • If partially correct, identify the missing piece and explain why it matters.
  4. Final score summary:

    • Areas of strength.
    • Areas needing review (link these to Phase 2 first principles).
    • Suggested re-study focus.

Sign off: "Phase 3 complete. Want a spaced repetition schedule? (y/n)"


Phase 4 — Spaced Repetition Table

Goal: Generate a concrete review schedule to move information to long-term memory.

  1. Categorize the material into:

    • Core concepts — must internalize permanently
    • Supporting details — useful context, less critical
    • Nitpicks / trivia — recall when needed, not priority
  2. Build the table:

    CadenceWhat to ReviewMethod
    Daily (first 3 days)Core conceptsActive recall (Phase 3 style)
    Weekly (first month)Core + supportingExplain from memory + connect to first principles
    Monthly (quarter 1)Core concepts onlyTeach someone else or write a summary
    Quarterly (year 1)Full map + any gapsDiagnostic quiz (Phase 7 style)
  3. Customize: Adjust cadence based on user's deadline, depth goal, and prior knowledge.

  4. Export suggestion: "Copy this table to a note app or flashcard system (Anki, RemNote, etc.)."

Sign off: "Phase 4 complete. Want a distilled knowledge summary? (y/n)"


Phase 5 — Knowledge Summary (Frameworks & Mental Models)

Goal: Distill the topic into clear frameworks, mental models, and simplified structures for easy retention and application.

  1. Extract the core frameworks:

    • What are the 2–3 mental models that capture the essence?
    • Can the topic be visualized as a map, tree, flowchart, or spectrum?
  2. Create a one-page cheat sheet (can be markdown, mermaid diagram, or conceptual map):

    • Core principles (3–5 bullet points max)
    • Relationships between concepts
    • Common pitfalls / anti-patterns
  3. Memorable hook: A one-sentence summary. "If you remember only one thing about this topic, it's _."

  4. Ask: "Does this summary match your mental model? What would you add or change?"

Sign off: "Phase 5 complete. Want a learning roadmap for deeper mastery? (y/n)"


Phase 6 — Learning Roadmap (Acceleration Plan)

Goal: Create a staged plan for going from current level to mastery, with clear milestones.

  1. Assess current level:

    • Rate 1–10: How well does the user understand the topic after Phase 1–5?
    • Identify the next logical growth area.
  2. Build the roadmap:

    StageGoalActivitiesCheckpoint
    FoundationSolid understanding of basicsReview Phases 1–5, spaced repetitionCan explain core concepts without notes
    ApplicationUse knowledge in real scenariosProjects, exercises, real-world applicationCompleted 3 practical exercises
    IntegrationConnect to adjacent domainsCross-domain reading, teach othersCreated a guide or tutorial for others
    MasteryPush boundaries, contributeAdvanced resources, community participation, original workPublished analysis, contribution, or project
  3. Resources: Recommend 1–2 books, courses, or projects per stage. Not overwhelm — specific, actionable picks.

  4. Time estimate: Realistic hours per stage based on topic complexity.

Sign off: "Phase 6 complete. Want a weak-point diagnosis to close remaining gaps? (y/n)"


Phase 7 — Weak Point Diagnosis

Goal: Identify remaining blind spots, misunderstandings, and suggest targeted fixes.

  1. Ask 5 diagnostic questions — designed to expose:

    • Common misconceptions about the topic
    • Edge cases the user hasn't considered
    • Connections between sub-topics they may have missed
    • Practical application nuances
  2. Analyze responses:

    • Pattern: are errors in one specific area?
    • Root cause: is the gap conceptual (didn't understand) or memory-based (forgot)?
  3. Prescribe targeted improvements:

    • For conceptual gaps → re-teach from first principles (Phase 2)
    • For memory gaps → spaced repetition (Phase 4)
    • For application gaps → practical exercise (Phase 6)
    • For blind spots → specific reading or exercise
  4. Final diagnosis summary:

    Strengths: [what they know well]
    Weak spots: [specific gaps]
    Root causes: [why those gaps exist]
    Rx: [targeted Phase references + one concrete next action]
    

Sign off: "Phase 7 complete. Run /blitz <topic> again in a week for reinforcement."


Quick Reference

PhaseNameCore QuestionDuration
1Feynman Technique"Can you explain it simply?"5–10 min
2First-Principles Breakdown"What are the irreducible truths?"5–10 min
3Active Recall Training"Can you retrieve it under pressure?"10–15 min
4Spaced Repetition Table"What to review, when?"5 min
5Knowledge Summary"What's the one-page cheat sheet?"5–10 min
6Learning Roadmap"What's the path to mastery?"5–10 min
7Weak Point Diagnosis"What am I missing?"10 min

Common Mistakes

  • Skipping Phase 1 — "I already know this." Feynman reveals hidden gaps. Run it anyway.
  • Rushing active recall — struggle is productive. Let the user sit with a hard question.
  • Overloading the roadmap — recommend 1–2 resources per stage, not a book list.
  • Too many diagnostic questions — 5 sharp questions > 20 shallow ones.

When NOT to Use

  • The user needs a quick fact, not deep understanding (use search / direct answer).
  • The topic is purely procedural / muscle memory (use practice drills, not this protocol).
  • The user explicitly wants just one thing (references, a roadmap, etc.) — use --phase=N.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.