agentsclimarketplace

Ai work assetization diagnoser

Skill PANGKAIFENG/ai-product-manager-skills/ai-work-assetization-diagnoser

AI 工作资产化诊断器 / Assetization Router:当用户提供 AI 协作会话、重复任务、prompt、工作流描述、 团队 AI 使用场景或一次成功交付过程,并要求判断应该沉淀成 Prompt、Context Pack、Workflow、Skill、 Loop、System,或根本不值得沉淀时使用。它只做诊断、分层和下一步资产建议,不替代具体 Skill 创建、 PRD 起草、调研、实现或自动化执行。不用于普通事实查询、一次性文案、trace 根因分析或高责任专业判断。From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add PANGKAIFENG/ai-product-manager-skills --skill ai-work-assetization-diagnoser

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 5 stars5 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

SKILL.md

6.8 KB, ~1.7k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

AI 工作资产化诊断器

中文速查

  • 中文名:AI 工作资产化诊断器 / 资产化路由器
  • 英文稳定名:ai-work-assetization-diagnoser
  • 分类:Skill/Agent 治理
  • 你可以这样叫我:这段工作是不是值得做成 Skill这个 prompt 应该沉淀成 workflow 还是 Skill帮我判断该资产化到哪层这个 AI 工作流要不要做成 Loop
  • 适合:判断一段可重复 AI 工作应该沉淀到哪个资产层,给出最小下一步 artifact 和验证信号。
  • 不适合:直接创建 Skill、直接实现自动化系统、普通日志根因定位、一次性事实查询、没有复用价值的闲聊。

Overview

这个 Skill 是 Router / Gate,不是执行器。它回答三个问题:

  1. 这段 AI 工作是否值得沉淀。
  2. 如果值得,最小有用资产层是什么。
  3. 为什么不是相邻层级。

默认输出应短、可执行、有证据。不要把所有重复任务都升级成 Skill,也不要把所有自动化想法都升级成 Loop。

Asset Layers

LayerUse WhenExample Artifact
Do Not Assetize低频、一次性、强主观、输入不可稳定复用、风险高或验收口径不存在。保留聊天记录或一次性笔记。
Prompt步骤简单,主要复用表达方式。Prompt template, checklist prompt.
Context Pack关键难点是资料、约束、样例和反例组织。Context folder, source bundle, glossary.
Workflow有稳定步骤、角色、输入输出和人工推进点。SOP, runbook, workflow doc.
Skill高频可复用,有明确触发语、输入、输出、边界和验收方式。SKILL.md + references/scripts.
Loop需要多轮状态、恢复、触发器、检查点、重试或人工接管。Loop contract, state files, update log.
System多个 Skill/Loop/Agent 组合,涉及权限、成本、审计、评估或团队级运行。Product/system PRD, architecture plan.

Workflow

  1. Identify input shape

    • AI conversation
    • repeated manual task
    • prompt or prompt pack
    • team workflow
    • successful delivery trace
    • failed or over-engineered asset proposal
  2. Extract evidence

    • user goal and business context
    • input materials and constraints
    • repeated steps
    • output artifact
    • human decision points
    • validation or acceptance criteria
    • frequency and reuse audience
    • state, retry, handoff, or automation needs
  3. Score only what matters

    • repeatability
    • input stability
    • output stability
    • validation clarity
    • context dependency
    • human judgment dependency
    • failure cost
    • reuse audience
  4. Recommend one primary asset layer

    • Give the smallest layer that would create real reuse.
    • Explain why the lower layer is insufficient.
    • Explain why the higher layer is overkill.
    • Include do-not-assetize if that is the best answer.
  5. Name the smallest next artifact

    • Prompt: one reusable prompt with slots.
    • Context Pack: file list and required metadata.
    • Workflow: step list and handoff format.
    • Skill: trigger description, non-triggers, output contract, references.
    • Loop: state files, stop conditions, Human Gate.
    • System: PRD / architecture / eval plan before implementation.
  6. Define reuse signal

    • What would prove this asset is worth deepening?
    • What failure signal should stop further investment?

Output Contract

Use this structure:

## Assetization Diagnosis

- Current shape: <conversation / prompt / context / workflow / skill candidate / loop candidate / system candidate>
- Recommended layer: <Do Not Assetize / Prompt / Context Pack / Workflow / Skill / Loop / System>
- Confidence: <High / Medium / Low>

## Evidence
- ...

## Why This Layer
- ...

## Why Not Adjacent Layers
- Lower layer is insufficient because ...
- Higher layer is overkill because ...

## Smallest Next Artifact
- ...

## Reuse Signal To Watch
- ...

## Do Not Do
- ...

For batch scenarios, use a compact table with columns:

  • Scenario
  • Current shape
  • Recommended layer
  • Evidence
  • Smallest next artifact
  • Reuse signal
  • Priority

Boundary Rules

  • If the user asks to create the actual Skill after diagnosis, hand off to skill-creator.
  • If the user asks whether an idea is a good product, use ai-collaboration-calibration or decision-research.
  • If the user asks to turn a product idea into a PRD, use prd-architect.
  • If the user asks to review an existing Skill, use skill-reviewer when available.
  • If the user provides trace/logs and wants root cause, use a trace/debug skill, not this one.
  • If the work is high responsibility, such as medical, legal, financial, safety, hiring, or compliance decisions, recommend human review and avoid closed-loop automation.

Non-Assetization Cases

Recommend not assetizing, or only a lightweight note, when:

  • The task happened once and is unlikely to recur.
  • The input varies so much that templates would mislead.
  • The output depends on taste or senior judgment with no stable rubric.
  • The cost of a wrong answer is high and no verification exists.
  • The user cannot name a reuse audience.
  • A simpler checklist would solve the problem.

Definition Of Done

  • The recommendation is one primary asset layer, not a vague list.
  • Adjacent layers are explicitly accepted or rejected.
  • The next artifact is small enough to create in one focused pass.
  • The answer includes a reuse or failure signal.
  • The diagnosis does not expose private context unless the user supplied and authorized it in this run.

Resources

  • references/asset-layer-rubric.md:当 Prompt / Context Pack / Workflow / Skill / Loop / System 边界不清时读取。
  • scripts/check_assetization_report.py:检查资产化诊断报告是否包含推荐层级、证据、最小下一步和复用信号。

Evaluation

Smoke prompts:

  • 这段工作是不是值得做成 Skill?
  • 这个 prompt 应该沉淀成 workflow 还是 Skill?
  • 我们连续三次做了类似 AI 协作,帮我判断该资产化到哪层。
  • 这只是一次性任务,不要过度沉淀。

Non-trigger prompts:

  • 直接帮我创建一个 Skill。
  • 看下这个 trace,定位根因。
  • 帮我写一个 PRD。
  • 查一下今天的新闻。

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 325,949. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.