Sql security
My agent skills
npx -y skills add krkrkrr/skills --skill sql-securityAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
SQL injection screening for host code (MoonBit / TS / Rust) plus secretlint setup notes. Flags single-line template-literal or string-concat SQL builders, regardless of value source — the scanner is line-based and does NOT trace data flow, so a clean scan is not proof of safety (multi-line template literals are missed) and every hit needs a manual review or an explicit `// sql-security: ok` opt-out.
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
5.6 KB, ~1.2k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
SQL Security
Use this when a project ships SQL through host code (MoonBit / TS / Rust / Go) and wants a cheap line of defence against the two recurring sources of SQL-domain incidents:
- SQL injection: a string template that interpolates a value into a SQL fragment instead of binding it through a placeholder.
- Secrets in queries: a hardcoded token or connection string that leaks into git history. Handled by
secretlint, not this skill — see "Companion: secretlint" below.
sql-injection-scan.mjs
node scripts/sql-injection-scan.mjs your-project/src
The scanner walks the directory, ignores generated files (db/gen/, sqlc_*.mbt, *.test.mbt, _build/, dist/, target/), and flags:
- template-interp: a backtick string literal that starts with a SQL keyword (
SELECT,INSERT INTO,WHERE,AND (, ...) AND contains a${...}placeholder. Example:`WHERE c.vector_id IN (${placeholders})`. - string-concat: a quoted SQL string adjacent to a
+and an identifier. Example:"SELECT * FROM " + table.
The keyword match is case-sensitive on purpose — from / where / join appear constantly in English prose and would generate hundreds of false positives if matched case-insensitively.
The scanner exits 1 on findings — every hit deserves a manual review even if it turns out to be safe.
Limitations — a clean scan is NOT proof of safety
The scanner reads one line at a time. Its template-literal rule requires the opening backtick, the ${...} placeholder, and the closing backtick to all sit on a single physical line. Consequences:
-
Multi-line template literals are silently missed. A query whose backtick opens on one line and whose
${value}lands on a continuation line (a common formatting style) produces zero findings and exit 0, even though it is a genuine injection. Example the scanner does NOT catch:const sql = ` SELECT id FROM users WHERE name = ${name} // <-- real injection, not flagged `; -
Exit 0 means "no single-line hits found," never "safe." When reviewing for SQL injection, also read any multi-line or programmatically-assembled SQL by hand; do not treat a clean scan as a pass. Fold a multi-line query onto one line if you want the scanner to see it.
This is a deliberate cost/coverage trade-off (zero-dep, no parser), not a bug — but it is a blind spot you must compensate for in review.
Reading the findings
A finding does not automatically mean injection. Many legitimate cases exist:
- Internal placeholder expansion: building
?,?,?,...,?for an IN clause from a server-derived count. The interpolated value is?, never user input. Annotate with the opt-out comment so future scans can ignore it. - FTS5 / vector queries that sqlc cannot parse: dynamic clause builders that interpolate column lists or
?counts. User input still passes through.bind(...). - Inline migration scripts building DDL at deploy time.
The scanner is intentionally noisy because the cost of missing one real SQLi is much higher than the cost of triaging a list of 5 false positives.
Opt-out marker
To silence a known-safe line, add a comment with the marker sql-security: ok either on the same line or on the line above:
// sql-security: ok (placeholders is server-derived `?` count, values bind separately)
const sql = `WHERE c.vector_id IN (${placeholders})`;
The scanner accepts // (TS / MoonBit / Rust / Go) and # (Python / shell) comment markers.
Companion: secretlint
For credential leakage (the other half of "SQL security"), use secretlint. Recommended setup for a pkfire-managed repo's pre-push hook:
pnpm add -D secretlint @secretlint/secretlint-rule-preset-recommend
Then run on pre-push:
pnpm exec secretlint --secretlintignore .gitignore "**/*"
This is per-repo and complements any user-global secretlint configuration. The mizchi/skills/pkfire skill has a ready-made recipe at assets/recipes/14-secretlint-pre-push.pkl for projects using pkfire hooks.
When to invoke
- pre-push: cheap, runs once before sending code to the remote.
- pre-commit: optional.
secretlinthere can be slow on large diffs;sql-injection-scanis cheap enough. - PR review: paste the scanner output into the review checklist.
Not in scope
- Stored XSS / template injection: these go through frontend / templating layers, not SQL.
- Authz bypasses: row-level access checks are app logic, not a SQL concern.
- DoS via expensive query: covered by
sql-plan-audit(look for new SCAN entries) and rate limiting at the edge.
Engine extensibility
The scanner regex is engine-agnostic. The SQL-keyword set works for SQLite / Postgres / MySQL out of the box. Add RETURNING / OVERLAPS / LIMIT OFFSET if a Postgres-heavy project needs broader coverage.
Requirements
- Node 20 or newer.
Files
scripts/sql-injection-scan.mjs— zero-dep text scanner.