Frontend review triage
My agent skills
npx -y skills add krkrkrr/skills --skill frontend-review-triageAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use when starting a frontend review engagement or when the user asks for an initial assessment ("triage", "day 0", "what's the state of this repo"). Reads package.json, README, gh issues, and produces a scorecard covering lockfiles, TypeScript strictness, testing, CI, and known issues. Runs `scripts/audit-triage.sh`.
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
3.1 KB, 701 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Frontend Review — Triage
You are performing Day 0 triage for a frontend consulting engagement. Your job is to produce a short, honest scorecard of the repository's current state, not to recommend fixes. Recommendations come later from the other frontend-review-* skills.
Procedure
- Classify the app before running any script.
- Ask the user (or infer from README / package.json) which app type applies:
admin/toc/btob-saas/ec/fintech/healthcare/iot-ops/media - Note any regulatory context (GDPR, PCI DSS, HIPAA, …) and authentication requirements.
- Read
checklist/00-app-classification.mdStep 3 to determine which security, performance, TypeScript strictness, lint, coverage targets, and dependency freshness checks are P0 vs P1 vs skip for this app type. - Save the result to
<client-repo>/.frontend-review/kpi/app-classification.json.
- Ask the user (or infer from README / package.json) which app type applies:
- Run
scripts/audit-triage.sh --repo <client-repo>where<client-repo>is the absolute path to the user's repository. - Read the resulting JSON at
<client-repo>/.frontend-review/report/latest/raw/triage.json. - Also quickly skim:
package.json— dependencies, scripts, enginesREADME.md— is it up-to-date, does it describe how to run things.github/workflows/— which workflows existgh issue list --state open --limit 20 --json number,title,labels— what's already flagged
- Cross-reference against
checklist/12-known-issues.mdfor the "known issues" collection routine.
Output
Write a Markdown report to <client-repo>/.frontend-review/report/latest/md/triage-scorecard.md with:
- App classification — type ID and key domain notes (1–3 lines)
- Priority overrides — which P0 security/perf checks apply to this app type
- Scorecard table (copy from
raw/triage.jsonand annotate) - Top 3 risks — what would you fix first? Flag whether each risk is P0 or P1 per the classification matrix.
- Open questions for the client (things you can't tell from the code)
- Next phase — which
checklist/items the Week 1 plan should target, ordered by the classification priority
Keep the entire report under 400 lines. If you find yourself writing more, you're analyzing instead of triaging.
Boundaries
- Do NOT propose fixes beyond a short "top 3 risks" section. Each risk is one sentence.
- Do NOT run any other
audit-*.shscript — leave those for the domain-specific skills. - Do NOT modify any files outside
<client-repo>/.frontend-review/. - Do NOT push commits or create PRs in the client repo.
Reference
- Checklist:
checklist/00-app-classification.md,checklist/12-known-issues.md,checklist/01-package-manager.md,checklist/02-dependencies.md - Phase:
phase/day-0-triage.md