Frontend review security
Skill krkrkrr/skills/skills/frontend/frontend-review-security
Use when conducting a frontend security review — static analysis (risky HTML patterns, env var exposure), authentication/authorization audit (token storage, route guards, logout), and AI self-penetration testing. Runs `scripts/audit-security.sh`. For CVE triage and deprecated library detection, use `frontend-review-deps`.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add krkrkrr/skills --skill frontend-review-securityAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its file declares
Copied from the file, not written here
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
6.6 KB, ~1.5k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Frontend Review — Security
You are performing a frontend security review. The focus areas are:
- Static — risky HTML sinks, environment variable exposure in client bundles
- Auth / Authorization — token storage, route guards, session management
- AI self-pentest — desk-check of common vulnerability patterns
- Staging environment — HTTP headers, auth boundaries, cookie flags
Procedure
- Run
scripts/audit-security.sh --repo <client-repo>. - Read
raw/security.json. - For each
dangerouslySetInnerHTML/v-html/.innerHTML =hit, locate the file and judge whether the input is sanitized. - Run the Authentication & Authorization review (see below).
- Run the Env / Config review (see below).
- For AI self-pentest, mentally walk through the attack scenarios below.
- For staging, draft the header checklist.
Authentication & Authorization Review
Token storage
Check where access tokens are stored and flag insecure patterns:
| Storage | Risk | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
httpOnly Cookie | JS-inaccessible, XSS-resistant | ✅ Recommended |
localStorage | Readable by any JS on the page — XSS steals it | ⚠ Flag + require XSS mitigations |
sessionStorage | Same XSS risk as localStorage | ⚠ Flag |
| In-memory (module variable) | Lost on reload; only viable in short-lived SPAs | Context-dependent |
- Check whether the refresh token is also stored in
httpOnlyCookie. - Check whether the access token lifetime is short (recommended: 15 min – 1 hour).
Route guards
- Does
ProtectedRoute(or equivalent) have a loading state that prevents a flash of the protected page before auth status resolves?
// Bad: no loading state — redirects to /login during initial auth check
if (!user) return <Navigate to="/login" />;
// Good: loading state prevents flash
if (isLoading) return <LoadingSpinner />;
if (!user) return <Navigate to={`/login?redirect=${encodeURIComponent(location.pathname)}`} />;
- Does the app redirect back to the original page after login (
redirect/redirect_toparam)? - Server-side authorization exists for every protected API endpoint — frontend guards alone can be bypassed via DevTools or curl.
Token refresh
- Does the API client auto-retry on 401 by refreshing the token first?
- Is refresh deduplicated so that parallel 401s don't trigger multiple refresh calls?
let refreshPromise: Promise<string> | null = null;
async function refreshToken(): Promise<string> {
if (refreshPromise) return refreshPromise;
refreshPromise = doRefresh().finally(() => { refreshPromise = null; });
return refreshPromise;
}
Logout
- Does logout call the server endpoint AND clear all client-side state?
// Required logout sequence:
await api.post('/auth/logout'); // revoke server-side session
queryClient.clear(); // clear TanStack Query cache
authStore.reset(); // clear Zustand / Jotai auth atoms
router.replace('/login'); // navigate away before clearing is dangerous
- After logout, does a hard-reload show the previous user's data? (Check: TanStack Query devtools, React state, localStorage)
Env / Config Review
VITE_/NEXT_PUBLIC_prefixed variables must not contain secrets. Vite / Next.js embed these into the client bundle — anyone can read them in DevTools..envmust not be committed. Run:git log --all --full-history -- '*.env'- Is
src/config.ts(or equivalent) the single entry point for env var reads? Directimport.meta.env.VITE_FOOcalls scattered in components are a review red flag. - Does
config.tsthrow at startup if a required env var is missing?
// config.ts — startup-time validation
const requireEnv = (key: string): string => {
const value = import.meta.env[key];
if (!value) throw new Error(`Missing required env var: ${key}`);
return value;
};
- Is
ImportMetaEnvextended invite-env.d.tsso that unknownVITE_*keys are caught by TypeScript?
AI Self-Pentest Scenarios
Walk through each scenario mentally and note: OK / finding / unable-to-determine.
- XSS via URL parameter — does a malicious
?q=<script>alert(1)</script>get rendered unsanitized? - XSS via form input — is user-supplied HTML ever rendered with
dangerouslySetInnerHTMLwithout sanitization? - CSRF — do state-mutating API calls require a CSRF token or use
SameSite=Strictcookies? - Auth boundary bypass — can an unauthenticated
fetch('/api/protected')return data? - Sensitive data in storage — does
localStorage.getItemreveal tokens, PII, or session data? - Client-side-only authorization — are there role checks in React code that are not mirrored server-side?
- Open redirect — does the
redirect/nextlogin parameter allow arbitrary external URLs?
Staging Checklist
Draft these for the human to run against the deployed staging URL:
-
Content-Security-Policyheader is present and restrictive -
Strict-Transport-Security(HSTS) withmax-age ≥ 31536000 -
X-Frame-Options: DENYorSAMEORIGIN -
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff - Cookies have
Secure,HttpOnly,SameSite=Strict(orLax) -
GET /api/mewithout a valid session returns 401, not user data -
GET /api/admin-onlyas a regular user returns 403, not data
Output
Write <client-repo>/.frontend-review/report/latest/md/security-review.md with:
- Static findings (risky sinks, env var exposure)
- Auth / Authorization findings (token storage, route guard gaps, logout issues)
- AI pentest notes (each scenario: OK / finding / unable-to-determine)
- Staging checklist (to be executed by the human)
- Issues to file (
gh issue createcommands with titles and bodies)
Do NOT execute the gh issue create commands yourself — print them for the human.
Boundaries
- Do NOT attempt actual exploitation. This is a desk review.
- Do NOT run scanners against production URLs.
- Do NOT touch the client source code.
- CVE triage and trend-watch are handled by
frontend-review-deps.
Reference
- Checklist:
10-security.md,25-auth-authorization.md,26-env-config.md - Phase:
week-3-security-vrt.md - OWASP: https://owasp.org/www-project-top-ten/