Cognitive ux marketplace
Skill kfeng209-oss/cognitive-ux/skills/cognitive-ux-marketplace
Design and audit marketplaces, directories, comparison sites, and third-party listing platforms using evidence-informed UX. Use when people must find and select a provider, seller, service, or listing; return a query/refinement model, comparable attributes, ranking explanation, trust/review rules, safe handoff, and validation plan.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add kfeng209-oss/cognitive-ux --skill cognitive-ux-marketplaceAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
2.5 KB, 448 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Cognitive UX: Marketplace & Directory
Scope
Use for multi-seller/provider comparison. Use cognitive-ux-commerce for an owned retail catalog and cognitive-ux-booking when the core task is reserving a time or resource.
Intake
- Identify supply type, buyer task, and decision criteria.
- Identify what is verified, sponsored, ranked, or paid for.
- Identify dispute, reporting, messaging, payment, and booking handoff rules.
State assumptions that could change the design. Define the primary user task, its consequence of failure, and a measurable success outcome before proposing a layout.
Design procedure
- Normalize the attributes people need to compare; let them refine without losing the active query.
- Explain ranking, sponsorship, verification, availability, and review provenance near the result—not only in legal text.
- Separate seller claims, platform-verified facts, and user reviews; expose review context and reporting routes.
- Show seller identity, total cost, delivery/return/cancellation terms, and dispute or safety support before commitment.
- Design comparison tools to assist judgment rather than create a misleading single score.
Label each non-obvious recommendation as Standard / requirement, Evidence-informed default, or Hypothesis to test. Read archetype evidence before making research claims.
Required outputs
- query, filter, sort, and comparison model
- ranking and sponsored-result explanation
- trust/review/dispute specification
- listing-to-contact or checkout handoff
- comprehension and fair-access validation plan
- Evidence-to-decision table: decision → mechanism → source → label → limitation → test metric.
- Accessibility, ethics, and recovery-path checklist.
Guardrails
Do not imply a ranking is neutral when it is paid or personalized, hide seller identity, manipulate reviews, or use a score without its basis.
Related skills
Use cognitive-ux-commerce, cognitive-ux-booking, and cognitive-ux-community. Do not combine multiple archetypes by default; select the primary user task and add another skill only when a secondary task is independently important.
What ships with it: 2 files
1.5 KB alongside SKILL.md
agents/
- openai.yaml220 B
references/
- archetype-evidence.md1.3 KB