Seo content gap

Skill fjilvvi/growthlens/skills/seo-content-gap

AI-agent skills for marketers, growth & business analysts — competitor teardowns, funnel audits, pricing analysis & more. 12 ready-to-use Agent Skills.

Install

npx -y skills add fjilvvi/growthlens --skill seo-content-gap

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Find SEO and content gaps between a site and its competitors — topics, search intents, content formats, and funnel stages the competitors cover but the site doesn't — and turn them into a prioritized content plan. Use when the user asks to "find content gaps", "what should we write about", "SEO gap analysis", "topics our competitors rank for", or "build a content plan vs <competitor>".

The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.

SKILL.md

4.0 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

SEO Content Gap Analysis

Find the topics and search intents your competitors cover and you don't — then turn the gaps into a prioritized content plan.

What it does

Compares the content footprint of a site against one or more competitors to surface gaps: missing topics, uncovered search intents, absent content formats, and underserved funnel stages. It then prioritizes the gaps into a content plan mapped to the buyer journey. This is an editorial/strategic gap analysis from public pages — it complements (not replaces) a keyword tool with volume data.

When to use this skill

"Find content gaps vs <competitor>."
"What topics should we be writing about?"
"Do an SEO gap analysis between our blog and theirs."
"Build a content plan to outrank <competitor>."

Inputs needed

Required: the user's site/blog URL and at least one competitor URL.
Helpful: the target audience and ICP, the product's key topics, and any keyword data the user already has (volumes, current rankings) — fold it in if provided.
If no competitor is given, ask for 1–3, or infer likely ones and confirm.

Method

Inventory each site's content — crawl the blog/resources/glossary of the user's site and each competitor. For each, list topic clusters and notable pages (pillar pages, guides, tools, glossaries, comparison pages).
Classify by intent & funnel stage — tag content as:
- Intent: informational, commercial, transactional, navigational.
- Stage: TOFU (awareness), MOFU (consideration), BOFU (decision).
Build the coverage matrix — topic clusters × sites; mark who covers what.
Identify the gaps:
- Topic gaps — clusters competitors cover that the user doesn't.
- Intent gaps — e.g. competitors have BOFU comparison/alternative pages and the user has only TOFU blog posts.
- Format gaps — missing tools, templates, glossaries, comparison pages.
- Depth gaps — topics the user covers thinly vs competitor pillar content.
Prioritize — score each gap by relevance to ICP, business value (funnel stage), and effort. Favor BOFU and high-relevance gaps for quick wins.
Produce a content plan — recommended pieces, each with target topic, intent, format, funnel stage, and the angle that beats existing results.

Output format

# SEO Content Gap — <Your site> vs <Competitors>

## TL;DR
- Where the biggest gaps are, and the 3 pieces to publish first.

## Coverage matrix
| Topic cluster | You | Comp A | Comp B | Gap type |
|---------------|-----|--------|--------|----------|

## Gaps by type
- Topic gaps: · Intent gaps: · Format gaps: · Depth gaps:

## Prioritized content plan
| # | Topic / title angle | Intent | Funnel stage | Format | Why (gap) | Priority |
|---|---------------------|--------|--------------|--------|-----------|----------|

## Quick wins (BOFU / high-relevance first)

Quality bar

Be explicit that this is an editorial gap analysis from visible content; if the user has keyword volumes/rankings, integrate them — otherwise don't invent search volumes or traffic numbers.
Every recommended piece maps to a real observed gap and a funnel stage.
Prioritize by business value, not just volume of missing posts.

Common mistakes to avoid

Listing every competitor post as a "gap" without checking relevance to the ICP.
Ignoring BOFU comparison/alternative pages (often the highest-value gaps).
Recommending topics the user already covers well (no depth check).