Ad creative analysis
AI-agent skills for marketers, growth & business analysts — competitor teardowns, funnel audits, pricing analysis & more. 12 ready-to-use Agent Skills.
npx -y skills add fjilvvi/growthlens --skill ad-creative-analysisAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Break down ad creatives (image, video, or copy) into hook, angle, awareness level, offer, format, and persuasion devices, then judge what's working and how to improve or remix them. Use when the user shares an ad, an ad-library link, or competitor creatives and asks to "analyze this ad", "break down the creative", "what's the angle/hook", "why does this ad work", or "give me variations to test".
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
3.8 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Ad Creative Analysis
Decode what makes an ad work — the hook, the angle, the awareness level it targets — and produce sharper variations to test.
What it does
Deconstructs one or several ad creatives into their persuasion building blocks (hook, angle, awareness level, offer, format, devices), evaluates fit between the message and its intended audience, and proposes new angles/hooks to test. Works for paid social, search, video scripts, or static creatives.
When to use this skill
- "Analyze this ad / these creatives."
- "What's the hook and angle here? Why does it work?"
- "Here are a competitor's ads from the ad library — break them down."
- "Give me variations / new angles to test."
Inputs needed
- Required: the creative(s) — image/screenshot, video link, or the ad copy text. For competitors, an ad-library link or screenshots.
- Helpful: the product, the target audience, the platform (Meta, TikTok, Google, YouTube), and the campaign goal (cold traffic vs retargeting).
- If you only have copy, analyze copy and note that visual elements weren't seen.
Method
- Transcribe the creative — the hook (first line/3 seconds), the body, the visual concept, the CTA, and the offer. For video, note the first-3-seconds pattern interrupt.
- Identify the angle — the core argument/desire it pulls (e.g. status, fear of missing out, time-saving, identity, contrarian take, before/after).
- Map the awareness level (Eugene Schwartz): unaware → problem-aware → solution-aware → product-aware → most-aware. The hook should match where the target sits. Flag mismatches.
- Classify the format & device — UGC, testimonial, demo, listicle, founder-to-camera, meme, comparison; and devices: curiosity gap, specificity, social proof, urgency, pattern interrupt, problem-agitate-solve.
- Judge the fit — does the hook stop the right person? Does the angle map to a real desire/pain? Is the offer/CTA clear and low-friction?
- Diagnose & remix — what's strong, what's weak, and 3–5 new hook/angle variations worth testing, each with the lever it pulls.
Output format
# Ad Creative Analysis — <product / source>
## TL;DR
- The angle, the awareness level it targets, and the verdict in 2–3 bullets.
## Creative breakdown
| Element | Finding |
|---------|---------|
| Hook (first line / 3s) | |
| Angle / core desire | |
| Awareness level targeted | |
| Format | |
| Persuasion devices | |
| Offer & CTA | |
## Fit check
- Does the hook stop the right person?
- Angle ↔ audience pain/desire match:
- Offer clarity / friction:
## What's working / what's weak
| Working | Weak |
|---------|------|
## Variations to test
| # | New hook | Angle / lever | Why test it |
|---|----------|---------------|-------------|
Quality bar
- Quote the actual hook/copy before interpreting it.
- Tie the awareness-level call to evidence in the creative.
- Variations must pull a different lever or angle — not reworded duplicates.
- No invented performance metrics (CTR, ROAS) unless the user supplies them.
Common mistakes to avoid
- Judging the visual style instead of the persuasion mechanics.
- Generating "variations" that are cosmetic rewrites of the same hook.
- Ignoring awareness level (the most common reason cold ads flop).