agentsclimarketplace

Pricing analysis

Skill fjilvvi/growthlens/skills/pricing-analysis

AI-agent skills for marketers, growth & business analysts — competitor teardowns, funnel audits, pricing analysis & more. 12 ready-to-use Agent Skills.

Install
npx -y skills add fjilvvi/growthlens --skill pricing-analysis

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Analyze a company's pricing and packaging from its pricing page — tiers, value metric, anchoring and decoy effects, good-better-best structure, gating, discounts, and monetization gaps — and recommend improvements. Use when the user shares a pricing page or asks to "analyze pricing", "review their plans", "is this priced right", "improve our packaging", or compares pricing across competitors.

The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.

SKILL.md

4.1 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Pricing & Packaging Analysis

Decode how a company prices and packages — and where they're leaving money on the table or scaring buyers away.

What it does

Breaks down a pricing page into its mechanics — the value metric, tier structure, psychological devices, and gating logic — then evaluates how well the pricing matches the buyer and recommends concrete changes. Works for a single company or a side-by-side comparison of several.

When to use this skill

  • "Analyze this pricing page: <url>."
  • "Is our pricing right? Here are our plans."
  • "Compare pricing for <A> vs <B> vs <C>."
  • Designing or auditing packaging, tiers, or a price increase.

Inputs needed

  • Required: the pricing page URL(s), or the plans/prices pasted in.
  • Helpful: the target customer, the product's main value metric, the user's goal (raise ARPU, reduce friction, move upmarket), and competitor prices.
  • If pricing is "contact sales" with nothing public, analyze the strategy that implies and ask for any figures the user has.

Method

  1. Inventory — list every plan: name, price, billing cadence, what's included, limits, and the headline benefit of each.
  2. Find the value metric — what does price scale on (seats, usage, contacts, revenue, flat)? Is it aligned with the value the customer gets and growth?
  3. Read the structure — Good-Better-Best? How many tiers? Is there a clear "most popular" anchor and an enterprise/contact tier as the upper anchor?
  4. Spot the psychology — anchoring, decoy tier, charm pricing, annual discount framing, urgency, "save X%", free tier/trial as acquisition.
  5. Check gating — are the right features gated to drive upgrades, or are key features locked too early (friction) or given away too freely (left money)?
  6. Assess fit — does the entry price match the ICP's willingness to pay? Is there a gap between free and the first paid tier (the "leap")?
  7. Recommend — specific changes: re-tiering, value-metric change, anchor additions, gating moves, packaging simplification. Prioritize by impact/effort.

Output format

# Pricing Analysis — <Company>

## TL;DR
- The value metric, the structure, and the single biggest pricing opportunity.

## Plan inventory
| Plan | Price | Billing | Value metric | Key inclusions / limits | Apparent target |
|------|-------|---------|--------------|-------------------------|-----------------|

## Structure & psychology
- Tier model (e.g. Good-Better-Best):
- Anchors (most-popular / enterprise):
- Devices observed (decoy, charm, annual discount, urgency):

## Gating & monetization
- What's gated where, and whether it drives upgrades:
- Free → first paid "leap":

## Fit with the buyer
- Entry price vs ICP willingness-to-pay:
- Where pricing creates friction or leaves money on the table:

## Recommendations
| # | Recommendation | Why (finding) | Impact | Effort |
|---|----------------|---------------|--------|--------|

(For a comparison, add a matrix: rows = companies, columns = entry price, value metric, # tiers, free option, annual discount, enterprise tier.)

Quality bar

  • Quote prices exactly as shown, with currency and cadence. Note the capture date.
  • Separate observed structure from your recommendations.
  • No invented willingness-to-pay or conversion numbers — reason qualitatively.
  • Every recommendation references a specific finding.

Common mistakes to avoid

  • Saying "too expensive / too cheap" without tying it to the buyer and value.
  • Ignoring the value metric (the highest-leverage pricing decision).
  • Recommending more tiers when the problem is an unclear anchor.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.