agentsclimarketplace

Positioning messaging audit

Skill fjilvvi/growthlens/skills/positioning-messaging-audit

AI-agent skills for marketers, growth & business analysts — competitor teardowns, funnel audits, pricing analysis & more. 12 ready-to-use Agent Skills.

Install
npx -y skills add fjilvvi/growthlens --skill positioning-messaging-audit

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Audit a company's positioning and messaging from its homepage and key pages — category, target customer, unique value, the message hierarchy, clarity, and differentiation — and rewrite the weak parts. Use when the user asks to "audit our messaging", "is our positioning clear", "review our homepage copy", "what's our value proposition", or shares a site and wants the positioning critiqued and sharpened.

The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.

SKILL.md

3.9 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Positioning & Messaging Audit

Find out whether a site's message is clear, differentiated, and aimed at the right buyer — then sharpen it.

What it does

Evaluates positioning (the strategic choice of category, audience, and differentiator) and messaging (how that choice is expressed on the page). It scores clarity and differentiation, maps the message hierarchy, and rewrites the weakest hero and value-prop copy.

When to use this skill

  • "Audit our positioning / messaging."
  • "Is our value proposition clear?"
  • "Review the homepage copy and tell me what's weak."
  • Comparing how two competitors position against each other.

Inputs needed

  • Required: the homepage URL (plus product/about pages if relevant).
  • Helpful: who the user thinks they're for, their main competitor, and what they believe their differentiator is — so you can flag say/do gaps.
  • If the user wants a rewrite, ask for the one outcome they most want a visitor to feel.

Method

  1. Capture the message as-is — copy the hero headline, subhead, primary CTA, and the top 3 value props verbatim.
  2. Apply the positioning frame (April Dunford-style):
    • Competitive alternatives — what does a customer use instead?
    • Unique attributes — what only this product has.
    • Value — what those attributes enable, that customers care about.
    • Best-fit customer — who cares most.
    • Category — the frame of reference the messaging sets.
  3. Run the 5-second clarity test — from the hero alone, can a stranger tell what it is, who it's for, and why it's better? Grade each.
  4. Map the message hierarchy — does the page flow promise → proof → objection handling → CTA? Are the value props ordered by what the buyer cares about?
  5. Check differentiation — is the differentiator real and specific, or a commodity claim ("easy", "powerful", "all-in-one") any competitor could make?
  6. Score & rewrite — score clarity, differentiation, and audience-fit (1–5 each), then rewrite the hero and the weakest value prop.

Output format

# Positioning & Messaging Audit — <Company>

## TL;DR
- Clarity __/5 · Differentiation __/5 · Audience-fit __/5
- The single biggest message problem.

## Current message (verbatim)
- Hero headline / subhead / CTA:
- Top value props:

## Positioning read
| Element | Finding |
|---------|---------|
| Competitive alternatives | |
| Unique attributes | |
| Value delivered | |
| Best-fit customer | |
| Category framing | |

## 5-second clarity test
- What it is: ✅/⚠️/❌ —
- Who it's for: ✅/⚠️/❌ —
- Why it's better: ✅/⚠️/❌ —

## Message hierarchy
- Flow & ordering issues:

## Differentiation
- Real vs commodity claims:

## Rewrites
**Hero (before → after):**
**Weakest value prop (before → after):**

## Prioritized fixes
| # | Fix | Why | Impact | Effort |
|---|-----|-----|--------|--------|

Quality bar

  • Quote the current copy exactly before critiquing it.
  • Rewrites must be specific to this company — no swappable platitudes.
  • Call out say/do gaps (claims the rest of the page doesn't back up).
  • Differentiation verdicts must explain why a claim is or isn't ownable.

Common mistakes to avoid

  • Critiquing tone/grammar instead of the strategic message.
  • Rewriting to sound clever rather than clear.
  • Accepting a vague differentiator because it "sounds good".

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.