Audit integrity
Skill fabioc-aloha/Alex_Skill_Mall/plugins/code-quality/audit-integrity
Shared audit integrity framework for all AppSec agents — enforces output quality, intellectual honesty, and continuous improvement through anti-rationalization guards, self-critique loops, retry protocols, non-negotiable behaviors, self-reflection quality gates (1-10 scoring, ≥8 threshold), and a self-learning system with lesson/memory governance for security analysis agents.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add fabioc-aloha/Alex_Skill_Mall --skill audit-integrityAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 4 stars4 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
3.3 KB, 593 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Audit Integrity Skill
Enforces output quality, intellectual honesty, and continuous improvement across all AppSec agents.
When to Use
- Every security analysis, code review, threat model, or quality scan agent run
- Applied automatically as a post-analysis quality gate
- Applicable to any agent performing SAST, SCA, threat modeling, or code quality analysis
Components
This skill provides 7 reusable capabilities. Agents apply all 7 unless their scope excludes a specific component.
| Component | Reference File | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Clarification Protocol | clarification-protocol.md | Ask ≤2 targeted questions before analysis when scope is ambiguous |
| Anti-Rationalization Guard | anti-rationalization-guard.md | Table of prohibited rationalizations with mandatory responses |
| Self-Critique Loop | self-critique-loop.md | Mandatory second-pass review after initial analysis |
| Retry Protocol | retry-protocol.md | Tool failure handling — retry once, then document |
| Non-Negotiable Behaviors | non-negotiable-behaviors.md | Hard rules: never fabricate, always cite evidence, report gaps |
| Self-Reflection Quality Gate | self-reflection-quality-gate.md | 1–10 scoring rubric with ≥8 threshold per category |
| Self-Learning System | self-learning-system.md | Lesson/Memory templates and governance rules |
Execution Flow
- Before analysis: Apply Clarification Protocol if scope is ambiguous
- During analysis: Apply Anti-Rationalization Guard at every decision point
- After initial pass: Execute Self-Critique Loop (mandatory second pass)
- On tool failure: Apply Retry Protocol
- Before delivery: Run Self-Reflection Quality Gate (all categories must score ≥8)
- After delivery: Create Lessons/Memories for novel findings, false positives, or methodology gaps (see Self-Learning System)
Agent-Specific Adaptation
Each agent customizes the Self-Critique Loop checklist and Self-Reflection Quality Gate categories to match its domain. The reference files provide the base templates; agents extend them with domain-specific items.
Example extensions per agent type
- SAST/SCA agents: Add taint trace completeness and manifest coverage checks
- SonarQube-style agents: Add rating sanity check (A–E consistency with findings)
- Threat modeling agents: Add STRIDE category completeness per trust boundary
- Code review agents: Add trust boundary audit with data flow tracing