Academic editorial judgment
Skill fabioc-aloha/Alex_Skill_Mall/plugins/academic-research/academic-editorial-judgment
284 curated plugins for AI assistants across 16 categories: security, Azure, documentation, code quality, cloud infrastructure, and more. Works with GitHub Copilot. Drop into .github/skills/local/ and go.
npx -y skills add fabioc-aloha/Alex_Skill_Mall --skill academic-editorial-judgmentAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 3 stars3 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Context-dependent editorial style rules for academic writing — APA7, Chicago, MLA judgment calls
SKILL.md
2.2 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Academic Editorial Judgment
The Problem
Complex editorial style rules require judgment, not pattern-matching:
Rule: "Use past tense for completed research, present for ongoing implications"
Bad (mechanical): Find all verbs, check tense
Good (judgment): Does this describe what was done (past) or what it means (present)?
APA7, Chicago, MLA — all have context-dependent rules.
The Solution
Apply critical thinking to editorial decisions:
1. Identify the Rule's Intent
| Rule | Surface Form | Actual Intent |
|---|---|---|
| Past tense for methods | "We analyzed..." | Completed actions |
| Present for conclusions | "Results show..." | Ongoing validity |
| Active voice | Subject-verb-object | Clarity, attribution |
2. Check Context Before Applying
❌ Mechanical: "Change all 'is' to 'was'"
✅ Judgment: "Is this describing what IS true, or what WAS done?"
Example:
- "The sample was collected..." ✅ Past (completed action)
- "The effect is significant..." ✅ Present (ongoing validity)
- "Figure 1 shows..." ✅ Present (the figure currently shows)
3. Preserve Author Voice
Don't "fix" intentional style choices:
- Regional spellings (behaviour/behavior)
- Disciplinary conventions
- Established terminology
Decision Tree
1. Is this a hard rule (spelling, citation format)?
→ Apply mechanically
2. Is this a judgment call (tense, voice, word choice)?
→ Check context
→ Consider author intent
→ Apply if clearly wrong, query if ambiguous
3. Am I confident this improves the text?
→ No: Leave a suggestion, don't change
→ Yes: Change with explanation
When to Apply
- Editing academic manuscripts
- Applying style guides (APA, MLA, Chicago)
- Any editorial work with context-dependent rules
Tags
academic editing style-guides judgment