Academic research

Skill fabioc-aloha/Alex_Skill_Mall/plugins/academic-research/academic-research

284 curated plugins for AI assistants across 16 categories: security, Azure, documentation, code quality, cloud infrastructure, and more. Works with GitHub Copilot. Drop into .github/skills/local/ and go.

Install

npx -y skills add fabioc-aloha/Alex_Skill_Mall --skill academic-research

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

3 stars3 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Research project scaffolding, thesis/dissertation writing, literature reviews, publication workflows, and the AI assistant-assisted academic workflows

SKILL.md

8.6 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Academic Research

Complete research lifecycle: project setup, literature review, writing, publication, and defense.

Project Structure

research-project/
├── .github/
│   └── copilot-instructions.md    # Research context for the AI assistant
├── docs/
│   ├── RESEARCH-PLAN.md           # Questions, timeline, milestones
│   ├── METHODOLOGY.md             # Design decisions
│   └── DECISION-LOG.md            # Key decisions with rationale
├── data/
│   ├── raw/                       # Untouched source data
│   ├── processed/                 # Cleaned/transformed
│   └── DATA-DICTIONARY.md         # Variable definitions
├── analysis/
│   ├── scripts/                   # Analysis code
│   └── outputs/                   # Figures, tables
├── writing/
│   ├── drafts/                    # Work in progress
│   └── submissions/               # Submitted versions
├── references/
│   ├── LITERATURE-MATRIX.md       # Systematic tracking
│   └── notes/                     # Reading notes
└── README.md

Quick Setup

mkdir -p .github docs data/{raw,processed} analysis/{scripts,outputs} writing/{drafts,submissions} references/notes
touch docs/RESEARCH-PLAN.md docs/METHODOLOGY.md references/LITERATURE-MATRIX.md .github/copilot-instructions.md

Research Project Types

Type	Duration	Output	Review
Master's Thesis	1-2 years	80-150 pages	Committee defense
PhD Dissertation	3-7 years	150-300+ pages	Committee + external
Journal Article	3-12 months	5,000-10,000 words	Peer review
Conference Paper	2-6 months	4,000-8,000 words	Peer review

Research Question Development

PICO Framework

Population — Who is being studied?
Intervention — What is being tested?
Comparison — Against what?
Outcome — What is measured?

FINER Criteria

Criterion	Question
Feasible	Can it be done with available resources?
Interesting	Does anyone care?
Novel	Does it add new knowledge?
Ethical	Can it be done ethically?
Relevant	Does it matter to the field?

Literature Review

Synthesis Approaches

Approach	When to Use
Thematic	Organize by concepts across sources
Chronological	Show field evolution
Methodological	Compare research approaches
Concept Matrix	Map concepts to sources in table

Gap Types

Empirical — No studies in specific context
Theoretical — Theory not applied to domain
Methodological — New methods could reveal insights
Population — Understudied demographic

Literature Matrix Template

| Citation | Year | Method | Findings | Gaps | Relevance |
|----------|------|--------|----------|------|-----------|
| Author1 et al. | 2024 | RCT | X | Y | ⭐⭐⭐ |

Methodology

Qualitative Methods

Method	Best For	Sample
Interviews	Deep understanding	10-30
Focus Groups	Group dynamics	4-8/group
Case Study	Detailed exploration	1-10
Grounded Theory	Theory generation	Until saturation

Quantitative Methods

Method	Best For	Sample
Survey	Breadth, generalization	100-1000+
Experiment	Causation	Power analysis
Quasi-experiment	No randomization	Varies

Mixed Methods

Convergent — Qual + quant simultaneously
Explanatory Sequential — Quant → Qual
Exploratory Sequential — Qual → Quant

Thesis/Dissertation Structure

Introduction — Problem, significance, research questions
Literature Review — Framework, prior work, gaps
Methodology — Design, collection, analysis
Results — Data without interpretation
Discussion — Interpret, connect to literature
Conclusion — Summary, contributions, limitations

Discipline Variations

Discipline	Variation
Sciences	Methods-heavy
Humanities	Multiple thematic chapters
Social Sciences	Separate theoretical framework
Engineering	Implementation + Evaluation chapters

Academic Writing

Hedging Language

Strong	Hedged
"This proves..."	"This suggests..."
"Always causes"	"May contribute to"
"Definitely shows"	"Evidence indicates"

CARS Model (Introductions)

Establish territory — topic importance
Establish niche — gap in knowledge
Occupy niche — your contribution

Citation Density

Section	Density
Abstract	None
Introduction	Medium
Related Work	High
Methods	Low-Medium
Results	Low
Discussion	Medium

Publication Workflow

Venue Selection

Research Type	Venue
User study with metrics	ACM CHI
Business implications	Harvard Business Review
Cognitive theory	Cognitive Systems Research
Philosophical AI argument	Minds & Machines

5-Phase Process

Phase	Duration	Focus
Preparation	1-2 weeks	Literature, outline, figures
Rough Draft	1-2 weeks	Write without editing
Revision	1-2 weeks	Structure → Section → Paragraph → Sentence
Feedback	2-4 weeks	Advisor, peers
Polish	1 week	Format, citations, submit

Responding to Reviews

## Response to Reviewer 1

### R1.1: "[Concern]"

We appreciate this observation. [How addressed].

Changes: Section X, paragraph Y: [new text]

Committee Navigation

Defense Preparation

Anticipate likely questions
Prepare 20-30 minute presentation
Know your limitations
Have backup slides
Practice with friendly audience

Common Concerns

Concern	Address With
"Why this topic?"	Strong motivation
"What's your contribution?"	Explicit list
"How is this valid?"	Robust methodology
"What about X?"	Scope, future work

Citation Management

Style	Discipline
APA 7	Psychology, social sciences
MLA 9	Humanities
Chicago	History
IEEE	Engineering, CS
Vancouver	Medicine

Refactoring Existing Projects

Audit Checklist

Has .github/copilot-instructions.md
Data separated: raw vs processed
Research questions documented
Literature systematically tracked
Methodology decisions recorded

Migration Pattern

git mv old-data.csv data/raw/
git mv cleaned.csv data/processed/
git mv draft.docx writing/drafts/paper-v1.docx

File Templates

RESEARCH-PLAN.md

# Research Plan: [Title]

## Research Questions
1. Primary: [Main question]
2. Secondary: [Supporting questions]

## Timeline
| Phase | Duration | Deliverable |
|-------|----------|-------------|
| Literature | Weeks 1-4 | Matrix complete |
| Collection | Weeks 5-12 | Raw data |
| Analysis | Weeks 13-16 | Results |
| Writing | Weeks 17-20 | Draft |

copilot-instructions.md (Research)

# [Project] - Research Context

## Current Phase
- [x] Literature Review
- [ ] Data Collection

## the AI assistant Guidance
- Add literature to references/LITERATURE-MATRIX.md
- Log decisions in docs/DECISION-LOG.md
- Citation style: APA 7

Pre-Submission Checklist

Tools

Tool	Purpose
Zotero	Reference management
Overleaf	LaTeX collaboration
Connected Papers	Literature discovery
Pandoc	Markdown to Word/PDF

Related Skills

literature-review — Systematic search
citation-management — APA formatting
md-to-word — Document conversion
dissertation-defense — Defense preparation

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.