Multi agent orchestration
Skill fabioc-aloha/Alex_Skill_Mall/plugins/ai-agents/multi-agent-orchestration
284 curated plugins for AI assistants across 16 categories: security, Azure, documentation, code quality, cloud infrastructure, and more. Works with GitHub Copilot. Drop into .github/skills/local/ and go.
npx -y skills add fabioc-aloha/Alex_Skill_Mall --skill multi-agent-orchestrationAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 3 stars3 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Coordinate multiple AI agents for complex tasks — decomposition, delegation, and synthesis
SKILL.md
8.8 KB, ~2.1k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Multi-Agent Orchestration Skill
Decompose complex problems into agent-appropriate subtasks, delegate effectively, and synthesize results.
⚠️ Rapid Evolution Domain
Multi-agent patterns are evolving rapidly. This skill captures stable patterns while acknowledging the field is in flux.
Refresh triggers:
- New orchestration frameworks (LangGraph, AutoGen, CrewAI releases)
- Claude/GPT native multi-agent features
- VS Code Copilot agent architecture changes
Last validated: February 2026
Core Concepts
When to Use Multi-Agent
| Scenario | Single Agent | Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| Simple code edit | ✅ | ❌ Overkill |
| Multi-file refactor | ✅ (if capable model) | ⚠️ Consider |
| Research + implement | ⚠️ Long context | ✅ Decompose |
| Cross-domain task | ❌ Context overload | ✅ Specialists |
| Parallel independent work | ❌ Sequential | ✅ Parallel agents |
Agent Roles
| Role | Responsibility | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Orchestrator | Decompose, delegate, synthesize | Main chat session |
| Specialist | Deep expertise in one domain | Security reviewer agent |
| Worker | Execute well-defined subtask | "Find all usages of X" |
| Critic | Validate, review, improve | Code review agent |
Decomposition Patterns
1. Horizontal Decomposition (Parallel)
Split task into independent subtasks that can run simultaneously.
┌─────────────────┐
│ Orchestrator │
└───────┬─────────┘
│ decompose
┌────┴────┬────────┐
▼ ▼ ▼
┌─────┐ ┌─────┐ ┌─────┐
│ A1 │ │ A2 │ │ A3 │ (parallel)
└──┬──┘ └──┬──┘ └──┬──┘
└────────┼────────┘
▼
synthesize
When to use:
- Tasks have no dependencies
- Results can be merged mechanically
- Time is critical
Example: "Search for security issues in auth, api, and database modules"
2. Vertical Decomposition (Pipeline)
Chain agents where each builds on previous output.
┌─────────────────┐
│ Orchestrator │
└───────┬─────────┘
▼
┌───────┐
│ A1 │ → research
└───┬───┘
▼
┌───────┐
│ A2 │ → analyze
└───┬───┘
▼
┌───────┐
│ A3 │ → implement
└───────┘
When to use:
- Each step needs output from previous
- Context builds incrementally
- Quality gates between steps
Example: "Research best practices → Design API → Implement → Review"
3. Hierarchical Decomposition (Tree)
Orchestrator delegates to sub-orchestrators who manage workers.
┌─────────────────┐
│ Root Orch │
└───────┬─────────┘
┌────┴────┐
▼ ▼
┌─────┐ ┌─────┐
│SubO1│ │SubO2│ (sub-orchestrators)
└──┬──┘ └──┬──┘
┌─┴─┐ ┌──┴──┐
▼ ▼ ▼ ▼
┌─┐ ┌─┐ ┌─┐ ┌─┐
│W│ │W│ │W│ │W│ (workers)
└─┘ └─┘ └─┘ └─┘
When to use:
- Very complex tasks
- Different domains within task
- Scale beyond single orchestrator's context
Delegation Best Practices
Crafting Agent Instructions
When delegating to a subagent, specify:
| Element | Purpose | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Context | What they need to know | "Working on the AI assistant VS Code extension" |
| Scope | Clear boundaries | "Only look in /src/services" |
| Output | Expected format | "Return JSON with findings" |
| Constraints | What NOT to do | "Don't modify files, only report" |
Template for Subagent Prompt
**Task:** [One-sentence objective]
**Context:**
- Project: [name/type]
- Relevant files: [list]
- What's already done: [state]
**Scope:**
- DO: [specific actions]
- DON'T: [boundaries]
**Expected Output:**
[Format and content expectations]
**Success Criteria:**
[How you'll know it's done right]
Synthesis Patterns
Merging Agent Outputs
| Pattern | When | How |
|---|---|---|
| Concatenate | Independent results | Simple append |
| Deduplicate | Overlapping searches | Hash/compare |
| Vote | Multiple opinions | Majority wins |
| Synthesize | Diverse perspectives | LLM summary |
| Validate | Critical decisions | Critic agent reviews |
Conflict Resolution
When agents disagree:
-
Identify conflict type
- Factual (check sources)
- Opinion (escalate to user)
- Interpretation (provide both views)
-
Resolution strategies
- Ask clarifying questions
- Request evidence from agents
- Escalate to more capable model
- Present options to user
VS Code Copilot Patterns
Using runSubagent Effectively
The runSubagent tool enables orchestration within VS Code:
// Good: Clear task with expected output
await runSubagent({
prompt: `Search the codebase for all error handling patterns.
Return a JSON array of: {file, line, pattern, quality}`,
description: "Find error patterns"
user-invokable: false
});
// Bad: Vague delegation
await runSubagent({
prompt: "Look for problems in the code", // Too vague
description: "Find issues"
user-invokable: false
});
When to Use Subagent vs Direct
| Scenario | Approach |
|---|---|
| Simple search | Direct grep_search |
| Complex multi-step search | runSubagent |
| Single file edit | Direct replace_string_in_file |
| Multi-file coordinated change | Consider subagent for planning |
| Research + implementation | Subagent for research, direct for implementation |
Common Anti-Patterns
❌ Over-Orchestration
Problem: Using multiple agents for simple tasks Symptom: Slower, more expensive, no quality gain Fix: Trust capable models for multi-step tasks up to complexity threshold
❌ Insufficient Context
Problem: Agents lack needed information Symptom: Repeated clarification requests, wrong assumptions Fix: Front-load context in delegation prompt
❌ No Synthesis Strategy
Problem: Raw agent outputs dumped on user Symptom: User must manually integrate results Fix: Plan synthesis before decomposition
❌ Circular Dependencies
Problem: Agent A needs B's output, B needs A's output Symptom: Deadlock or infinite loops Fix: Identify and break cycles in task graph
Framework Landscape (2026)
| Framework | Strength | Use Case |
|---|---|---|
| LangGraph | State machines, cycles | Complex workflows |
| AutoGen | Conversation patterns | Research, debate |
| CrewAI | Role-based teams | Business processes |
| VS Code Agents | IDE integration | Code tasks |
| Semantic Kernel | .NET native | Enterprise C# |
the AI assistant-Specific Patterns
Heir Orchestration
your AI assistant can coordinate heirs for cross-platform tasks:
your AI assistant (orchestrator)
├── VS Code Heir → code analysis
├── M365 Heir → document synthesis
└── Global Knowledge → pattern matching
Skill Selection as Orchestration
When the AI assistant runs Skill Selection Optimization (SSO), it's a form of self-orchestration:
- Survey available skills (agents)
- Match to task requirements
- Load relevant skills
- Execute with combined expertise
Implementation Checklist
When designing multi-agent workflows:
- Can a single capable model handle this?
- Are subtasks truly independent (or pipelined)?
- Is context sufficient for each agent?
- Is output format clearly specified?
- Is synthesis strategy defined?
- Are failure modes handled?
- Is the orchestration overhead justified?
Related Skills
- skill-selection-optimization — Pre-task skill loading
- prompt-engineering — Crafting effective agent prompts
- appropriate-reliance — Knowing when to trust agent output
- root-cause-analysis — Debugging multi-agent failures
Multi-agent orchestration is powerful but not always necessary. Start simple, add agents when complexity demands it.