agentsclimarketplace

Rvs credit scoring

Skill alzadjaliaafra-hash/murshidi-knowledge-layer/models/rvs-credit-scoring

Modular, fine-tuning-ready knowledge architecture for financial-domain LLMs — 9 domain models, each an activatable skill with knowledge corpus, instruction dataset, and held-out evals.

Install
npx -y skills add alzadjaliaafra-hash/murshidi-knowledge-layer --skill rvs-credit-scoring

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

2 things to look at

  • 28 days oldThe repository was created 28 days ago. New is not bad, but a brand new repository carrying a familiar-sounding name is the shape a typosquat arrives in, and there has been no time for anyone else to find a problem with it.
  • 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Rescue Viability Score (RVS) — a 6-variable logistic regression credit model with a discrete-time hazard survival layer for assessing recovery viability of distressed companies. v3.0 covers listed companies; v4.0 extends to private companies with analyst-adjustment layers, governance scoring, and Sharia compliance screening. Activate with /rvs, "rescue screen", "viability score", or when financial statements are provided for distress assessment.

SKILL.md

4.8 KB, ~1.2k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Rescue Viability Score (RVS)

A proprietary 6-variable logistic regression model with a hazard survival layer for rescue-finance credit decisions. Validated at 93.0% forward accuracy (hazard AUC 0.985, leave-one-out AUC 0.979, mean calibration error 0.029, Brier skill score 0.793) on a 47-company distress cohort. Outperforms the Altman Z-Score by approximately 30 percentage points on distressed rescue targets.

Architecture

Financial Statements → 8 Raw Numbers → 6 Variables (V1–V6)
  → Logistic Regression P(Recovery)
  → Discrete-Time Hazard Layer → 5-Year Survival S(5)
  → Composite Score → Verdict (GO / CONDITIONAL / NO-GO)

Variables

VariableFormulaSignal
V1Working Capital / Total AssetsLiquidity
V2Retained Earnings / Total AssetsCumulative profitability
V3EBITDA / Total DebtDebt coverage
V4Operating Cash Flow / Total DebtCash flow coverage
V5Net PPE / Total LiabilitiesCollateral backing
V6Revenue / Total AssetsAsset turnover (negative coefficient — captures "high turnover, thin margin" distress)

v3.0 Coefficients (Listed Companies)

Logistic regression: Intercept +2.5445 · V1 +0.2506 · V2 +1.7070 · V3 +0.7426 · V4 +0.7262 · V5 +0.8278 · V6 −1.8122

Hazard model: Constant −1.9295 · V1 −0.2312 · V2 +0.3298 · V3 +0.7437 · V4 −7.1443 · V5 −27.7134 · V6 +3.8640 · TimeDummy(Yr 4–5) −0.8840 · MacroShock(2020–21) +3.8256

Composite: V3_score = 0.60 × P(Recovery) + 0.40 × S(5yr)

Verdicts: GO ≥ 0.70 · CONDITIONAL 0.50–0.69 · NO-GO < 0.50

Mandatory stress tests (4): Working Capital Crisis (V1 × 0.50), Margin Compression (V3 × 0.60), Refinancing Crisis (V4 × 0.40), Perfect Storm (all combined).

v4.0 Extensions (Private Companies)

Analyst adjustments before variable computation: owner-compensation add-back, related-party-transaction EBITDA haircut, collateral appraisal factor (0.70–1.00), revenue under-reporting factor (1.00–1.10).

Hazard logit: z_h(t) = −3.0 + 0.15V1 + 0.80V2 + 0.45V3 + 0.40V4 + 0.50V5 − 0.90V6 + governance_penalty + concentration_penalty, with 5% annual variable decay (V(k,t) = V(k,0) × 0.95^(t−1)), a 1.20× private-company hazard multiplier, governance penalty −0.005 × (100 − GovernanceScore) and concentration penalty +0.003 × ConcentrationScore.

Composite: V4_score = P(Recovery) × S(5yr) × (1 − InfoAsymmetry) × GovernanceFactor, where GovernanceFactor = 0.80 + 0.20 × (GovernanceScore / 100).

Verdicts: GO ≥ 0.65 · CONDITIONAL 0.50–0.64 · NO-GO < 0.50. Sharia non-compliance (AAOIFI screens: Debt/Assets < 33%, (Cash + interest-bearing securities)/Assets < 33%, non-compliant revenue < 5%) applies an automatic one-tier verdict downgrade.

Mandatory stress tests (6): the four v3.0 scenarios plus Key-Person Loss and Governance Collapse. Stress resilience rating: STABLE (0 downgrades) / MODERATE (1–2) / FRAGILE (3+).

Seven Critical Analyst Errors (enforce in every output)

  1. Including trade payables in Total Debt — use interest-bearing borrowings only
  2. Using gross PPE instead of net PPE for V5
  3. Zeroing V2 when Retained Earnings are negative — use the actual negative number
  4. Being alarmed by V6's negative coefficient — it is intentional
  5. Mixing fiscal years across the 8 raw numbers
  6. Setting the macro-shock dummy to 1 for current analysis — it is 1 only when backtesting 2020–2021
  7. Forgetting to cap V3/V4 at 2.0 when Total Debt = 0

Output Protocol

Present the 8 raw numbers in an extraction table, show all 6 variable calculations, display the Z-score term by term, convert to P(Recovery), compute hazard rates year by year, calculate the composite with the formula shown, state the verdict with the threshold it cleared, run all stress tests in a summary table, and state the stress resilience rating. Show every coefficient and intermediate calculation — the output must be defensible in an investment committee.

Resources

  • knowledge/methodology.md — full model methodology and validation results
  • dataset/train.jsonl — instruction-tuning pairs
  • eval/eval.jsonl — held-out evaluation questions

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.