Evaluate
Skill aksheyw/career-command-center-template/skills/evaluate
Evaluate a JD before applying — 7-block assessment with go/no-go score. Argument: [paste JD text or URL here]From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add aksheyw/career-command-center-template --skill evaluateAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
2.8 KB, 647 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
You are evaluating a job description using the 7-block evaluation framework. The user has pasted a JD or provided a URL.
STEP 1: Read required files
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/resume-customizer/references/evaluation-framework.md— the 7-block rubric and scoring dimensions${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/resume-customizer/SKILL.md— company-type strategies, verified metrics${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/resume-customizer/references/star-stories.md— STAR stories for Block F mapping${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/resume-customizer/references/story-bank-index.md— cross-indexed story selection${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/YOUR_PROFILE.md— the user's verified background
STEP 2: If URL provided, fetch the JD
If the user provided a URL instead of JD text, use WebFetch to retrieve the job description content.
STEP 3: Run all 7 evaluation blocks
Follow evaluation-framework.md exactly:
- Block A: Classify the role (archetype, seniority, domain, remote, team size, fit level)
- Block B: Cross-reference every JD requirement against the user's verified experience. Use ONLY metrics from
YOUR_PROFILE.md. Flag gaps with mitigation strategies. - Block C: Assess seniority match and positioning strategy
- Block D: Research compensation using WebSearch (Glassdoor, Levels.fyi, Blind, regional equivalents). Cite exact sources with URLs.
- Block E: List top 5 resume customizations + top 3 LinkedIn changes
- Block F: Map STAR stories to JD requirements using
story-bank-index.md. Flag any story gaps. - Block G: Assess posting legitimacy (freshness, company health, red flags)
STEP 4: Score and verdict
Calculate scores for all 6 dimensions (1-5 scale each):
- CV Match, North Star Alignment, Compensation, Culture, Red Flags, Global Score
- Compute average
- Apply threshold: >= 3.5 = GO | 2.5-3.4 = CAUTION | < 2.5 = SKIP
STEP 5: Output the evaluation report
Use the exact output format from evaluation-framework.md. Include:
- All scores with brief justifications
- Verdict with reason
- Key strengths and gaps with mitigations
- Recommended STAR stories for interview prep
- Legitimacy assessment
- Clear next-step recommendation
STEP 6: If CAUTION or SKIP
Explain specifically what would need to change for this to become a GO. Be honest — don't soft-pedal gaps.
RULES
- Never invent metrics — only use verified data from
YOUR_PROFILE.md - Never overclaim ownership — follow the accuracy guardrails in
SKILL.md - Compensation research must cite sources with URLs and dates
- If posting is older than 60 days, flag it prominently
- If the role is clearly below the user's target level, note the downlevel risk
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.