agentsclimarketplace

Memory query workflow

Skill yeaight7/agent-powerups/skills/memory-query-workflow

Curated power-ups for coding agents: skills, slash commands, MCP configs, hooks, AGENTS.md templates, and workflows for serious software engineering. Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity CLI, Cursor and more

Install
npx -y skills add yeaight7/agent-powerups --skill memory-query-workflow

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 6 stars6 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Use when a graph already exists and the user needs retrieval, tracing, explanation, or gap detection from graph memory before reopening the full corpus.

SKILL.md

2.3 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Memory Query Workflow

Overview

Use existing graph memory first.

Query the graph before rereading source files unless the graph is missing, stale, or too weak for the question.

Required Check

apx check graphify

Required State

  • existing graphify-out/graph.json

Routing

Question shapeAction
broad question about connected conceptsgraphify query
trace between two concepts, files, or systemsgraphify path
explain one concept or node in contextgraphify explain
no graph existsswitch to memory-build-workflow
graph exists but corpus changedrecommend graphify --update before trusting results

Core Rules

  • prefer graph retrieval over full-corpus reread
  • say explicitly when the graph is missing, stale, sparse, or weakly matched
  • do not overclaim beyond what graph nodes and edges support
  • when graph coverage is weak, use the graph result to target the next direct read instead of restarting broad exploration

Minimal Workflow

  1. Confirm graphify-out/graph.json exists.
  2. Choose query, path, or explain based on question shape.
  3. Answer from graph evidence first.
  4. If result quality is weak, say why: missing graph, stale graph, low coverage, or weak node match.
  5. Escalate to build/update or targeted reread only when needed.

Common Failure Modes

  • skipping graph lookup and rereading everything
  • hiding that the graph is stale or incomplete
  • using query for a question that clearly needs a path trace
  • treating no-result output as proof the corpus lacks the concept

Verification

  • Graph existence was confirmed before any query ran
  • The command matched the question shape: query for breadth, path for traces, explain for one node
  • The answer is grounded in graph nodes and edges — no overclaiming
  • Staleness, sparseness, or weak node matches were stated explicitly
  • Escalation to build, update, or targeted reread happened only when graph evidence was insufficient

Reference

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.