Agent harness design
Skill yeaight7/agent-powerups/plugins/agentic-systems/skills/agent-harness-design
Curated power-ups for coding agents: skills, slash commands, MCP configs, hooks, AGENTS.md templates, and workflows for serious software engineering. Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity CLI, Cursor and more
npx -y skills add yeaight7/agent-powerups --skill agent-harness-designAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 6 stars6 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use when designing tool definitions for a new agent or subagent, an agent shows high retry rates, ambiguous tool invocations, or silent failures, or an existing agent harness needs a quality review.
SKILL.md
4.3 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Agent Harness Design
Use when designing or improving how an agent invokes tools, handles errors, and decides when to stop.
When to Use
- Designing tool definitions for a new agent or subagent
- Observing high retry rates or ambiguous tool invocations
- Agent is failing silently or completing without verifying outcomes
- Reviewing an existing agent harness for quality issues
Tool Design Rules
Naming
- Use explicit, stable names:
read_file,run_tests,apply_patch - No generic names:
do_action,execute,handle - One tool per distinct operation; do not overload parameters to compensate
Schema
Keep tool inputs narrow:
- Required fields only; no optional fields that change behavior
- Use enums for mode/type values — never free-text strings that require parsing
- Validate at the boundary; reject malformed input with a clear error, not a fallback
{
"name": "run_tests",
"parameters": {
"path": { "type": "string", "description": "Path to test file or directory" },
"filter": { "type": "string", "description": "Optional test name filter" }
}
}
Output Shape
Every tool response must include:
status:"success" | "warning" | "error"summary: one-line result (human-readable)next_actions: list of follow-up steps the agent should considerartifacts: file paths or IDs produced (empty list if none)
Catch-All Tools
Avoid run_bash / shell_exec style catch-all tools unless:
- The task is genuinely open-ended and the toolset cannot be pre-defined
- You explicitly document the risk and add an allowlist or preflight check
If you must use a catch-all, add a PreToolUse validation hook for dangerous patterns.
Error Path Rules
Every tool must define what happens on failure:
| Case | Required response |
|---|---|
| Invalid input | Reject immediately with status: "error" and exact field name |
| Transient failure | Include retry_after hint and idempotency note |
| Non-recoverable | State stop: true and describe the manual resolution step |
Do not return partial success with no indication that something failed.
Retry and Stop Conditions
Define retry limits in the harness, not inside tool implementations:
max_retries: 2
stop_conditions:
- tool returns status: "error" with stop: true
- same tool called with identical inputs twice in a row
- completion signal received
Never retry indefinitely. Declare a hard ceiling.
Context Budget
- Keep system prompt fixed and minimal — it is loaded on every turn
- Put large reference material (schemas, docs) in skills loaded on demand
- Compact at phase boundaries (after research, after planning, after debugging)
- Do not pass growing tool-call history to subagents; summarize into a context bundle
Granularity Guide
| Risk level | Tool granularity |
|---|---|
| High (deploy, migrate, permissions) | Micro — one action, one confirmation |
| Medium (edit, read, search) | Standard — composite is fine |
| Low (format, report, list) | Macro — batch operations acceptable |
Benchmarks to Track
- Completion rate (task finished without escalation)
- Retries per task
- Pass@1 rate (completed on first attempt)
- Cost per successful task
Anti-Patterns
- Overlapping tool semantics (agent cannot choose between them)
- Tool returns only on error — no output on success
- No explicit stop condition — agent loops indefinitely
- Context overload — every tool call inlines full file contents
Verification
- Every tool has an explicit, stable name and exactly one distinct operation
- Schemas use required fields and enums — no free-text mode strings, no behavior-changing optionals
- Every tool response carries
status,summary,next_actions, andartifacts - Every tool defines its invalid-input, transient-failure, and non-recoverable paths
- Retry ceiling and stop conditions are declared in the harness, not inside tools
- Any catch-all tool is documented with its risk and guarded by an allowlist or preflight check