Ai slop cleaner
Curated power-ups for coding agents: skills, slash commands, MCP configs, hooks, AGENTS.md templates, and workflows for serious software engineering. Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity CLI, Cursor and more
npx -y skills add yeaight7/agent-powerups --skill ai-slop-cleanerAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 6 stars6 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use when a working code path feels bloated, noisy, or over-abstracted, when asked to clean up or deslop AI-generated code, or when a reviewer-only anti-slop pass is requested.
SKILL.md
4.2 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Purpose
Reduce AI-generated code bloat through systematic, smell-by-smell cleanup that preserves existing behavior and raises signal quality.
When to Use
- A code path works but feels bloated, noisy, repetitive, or over-abstracted.
- A user asks to "cleanup", "refactor", or "deslop" AI-generated output.
- Follow-up implementation left duplicate code, dead code, weak boundaries, or missing tests.
- A disciplined cleanup workflow is needed without broad rewrites.
- The user wants a reviewer-only anti-slop pass via
--reviewmode.
This skill accepts an optional file list scope. If a changed-files list is provided, keep the cleanup strictly bounded to those files. Do not silently expand a changed-file scope.
Inputs
- Codebase or module to clean (or explicit file list scope).
- Existing test suite (required — behavior must be locked before editing).
Workflow
-
Lock behavior with regression tests first
- Identify the behavior that must not change.
- Add or run targeted regression tests before touching cleanup candidates.
- If behavior is currently untested, write the narrowest test coverage needed first.
-
Create a cleanup plan before code
- List the specific smells to remove.
- Bound the pass to the requested files/scope.
- Order fixes from safest/highest-signal to riskiest.
- Do not start coding until the cleanup plan is explicit.
-
Categorize issues
- Duplication — repeated logic, copy-paste branches, redundant helpers
- Dead code — unused code, unreachable branches, stale flags, debug leftovers
- Needless abstraction — pass-through wrappers, speculative indirection, single-use helper layers
- Boundary violations — hidden coupling, leaky responsibilities, wrong-layer imports or side effects
- Missing tests — behavior not locked, weak regression coverage, gaps around edge cases
-
Execute passes one smell at a time
- Pass 1: Dead code deletion
- Pass 2: Duplicate removal
- Pass 3: Naming and error handling cleanup
- Pass 4: Test reinforcement
- Re-run targeted verification after each pass.
- Do not bundle unrelated refactors into the same edit set.
-
Run quality gates
- Regression tests stay green.
- Lint passes.
- Typecheck passes.
- Relevant unit/integration tests pass.
- Diff stays minimal and scoped.
- No new abstractions or dependencies unless explicitly required.
Review Mode (--review)
If invoked with a --review flag, operate as a reviewer-only pass:
- Do not start by editing files.
- Review the cleanup plan, changed files, and regression coverage.
- Check specifically for leftover dead code, duplicate logic, needless wrappers, and missing tests for preserved behavior.
- Produce a reviewer verdict with required follow-ups.
- Hand needed changes back to a separate writer pass instead of fixing and approving in one step.
Output
AI SLOP CLEANUP REPORT
======================
Scope: [files or feature area]
Behavior Lock: [targeted regression tests added/run]
Cleanup Plan: [bounded smells and order]
Passes Completed:
1. Dead code deletion - [concise fix]
2. Duplicate removal - [concise fix]
3. Naming/error handling cleanup - [concise fix]
4. Test reinforcement - [concise fix]
Quality Gates:
- Regression tests: PASS/FAIL
- Lint: PASS/FAIL
- Typecheck: PASS/FAIL
- Tests: PASS/FAIL
Changed Files:
- [path] - [simplification]
Remaining Risks:
- [none or short deferred item]
Verification
- Regression tests written or confirmed before any edits
- Cleanup plan explicit before coding started
- Each pass limited to one smell category
- Quality gates pass after each pass
- Diff is minimal and scoped — no unrelated changes
Failure Modes
- Editing before tests — Never clean up code whose behavior isn't locked by tests.
- Multi-smell passes — Bundling smell categories into one large refactor makes verification impossible.
- Scope creep — If given a file list scope, stay within it. Do not expand to adjacent files.