agentsclimarketplace

Contagious

Skill wondelai/skills/contagious

Wondel.ai Agent Skills — Business, Marketing, UX & Coding Frameworks from Bestselling Books. 50 skills + 12 guided journeys for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor & other agentskills.io agents.

Install
npx -y skills add wondelai/skills --skill contagious

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Engineer word-of-mouth and virality using the STEPPS framework (Social Currency, Triggers, Emotion, Public, Practical Value, Stories). Use when the user mentions "go viral", "word of mouth", "shareable content", "social currency", "why people share", "referral program", "nobody is sharing it", or "make this spread". Also trigger when designing shareable features, crafting social campaigns, or building products that spread through peer recommendation. Covers environmental triggers and high-arousal emotional content. For sticky messaging, see made-to-stick. For persuasion tactics, see influence-psychology.

The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.

SKILL.md

17.3 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Word-of-Mouth & Virality Framework

A framework for engineering word-of-mouth and making products, ideas, and content contagious, based on Jonah Berger's research into why things catch on. Use it to design shareability into products, campaigns, and content instead of hoping for luck.

Core Principle

Virality is not born — it is engineered. Products spread because they were designed — consciously or not — to be shared. Only 7% of word-of-mouth happens online; the other 93% happens in offline conversations, so virality is about the psychology of sharing, not social media mechanics. Those psychological patterns are predictable and can be engineered into anything using the STEPPS framework.

See: references/word-of-mouth.md when the brief over-indexes on social media — it makes the offline-vs-online case, lists conversation triggers, and gives a WOM measurement/audit method.

Scoring

Goal: 10/10. Score each of the six STEPPS drivers (the six Quick Diagnostic rows) — 0 absent, 1 present but weak, 2 strong and deliberate — for a raw 0-12, then map: 11-12 -> 10, 9-10 -> 8-9, 6-8 -> 6-7, 3-5 -> 4-5, 0-2 -> <=3. Bands:

  • 9-10 — three or more drivers at strength 2, at least one of them Public or Social Currency (the self-propagating ones), and the brand survives the Trojan Horse test.
  • 6-8 — two drivers genuinely strong, but spread still leans on paid reach or product quality alone.
  • <=5 — at most one weak driver; sharing is incidental, not engineered.

Report the raw count, the mapped score, and the specific driver(s) to raise next to reach 10/10.

STEPPS Overview

Not a checklist — a multiplier. Each principle independently increases sharing; the most contagious ideas activate several at once, but even one or two done well dramatically increase word-of-mouth.

PrincipleCore QuestionSharing Driver
S — Social CurrencyDoes sharing it make people look good?Self-enhancement
T — TriggersWhat in the environment reminds people of it?Top-of-mind accessibility
E — EmotionDoes it fire up high-arousal feelings?Physiological arousal
P — PublicCan others see people using it?Observational learning
P — Practical ValueIs it useful enough to pass along?Altruism and helpfulness
S — StoriesIs the brand embedded in a narrative?Entertainment and identity

The STEPPS Framework

1. Social Currency

Core concept: People share things that make them look good — smart, cool, in-the-know. Make people feel like insiders and they'll spread it to boost their own image.

Why it works: Sharing is self-presentation — listeners infer the sharer's traits from what they pass on, so people curate shares the way they curate clothes. Mechanism: give the sharer a payoff in status or identity and you outsource your marketing to their ego.

Key insights:

  • Remarkability — surprising, novel, or extreme things make the sharer seem interesting; "Did you know...?" is a powerful sharing trigger
  • Game mechanics — leaderboards, badges, and status tiers create visible accomplishments people want to display
  • Exclusivity and scarcity — secret menus and invite-only access give people "insider knowledge" to share
  • Inner remarkability — even mundane products have a remarkable angle; it's framing, not the product

Product applications:

ContextApplicationExample
Content platformInsider statistics or year-in-reviewSpotify Wrapped
Mobile appShareable accomplishment cardsDuolingo streak badges
B2B productBenchmarking data users want to citeHubSpot State of Marketing report

Copy patterns:

  • "Most people don't know that..."
  • "You're one of the first to try..."
  • "You've unlocked [achievement]..."

Ethical boundary: Create real insider value, not false scarcity or manufactured exclusivity that breeds toxicity.

See: references/social-currency.md when a product feels unremarkable — it has the inner-remarkability exercise, game-mechanic design, exclusivity types, and a scored audit.

2. Triggers

Core concept: Top-of-mind means tip-of-tongue. Link your product to environmental cues — sights, sounds, times, routines — so everyday life keeps reminding people to talk about you.

Why it works: Most word-of-mouth is driven not by excitement but by whatever happens to be top-of-mind mid-conversation; a product linked to a frequent cue gets mentioned more because it's more accessible in memory.

Key insights:

  • Frequency beats strength — a daily trigger (coffee) outperforms a powerful but rare one (a holiday); Kit Kat linked itself to coffee breaks
  • Habitat matters — map where and when people encounter contexts related to your product
  • Competitive triggers — link a competitor's moment to your own brand
  • Ongoing vs. temporary — persistent environmental triggers sustain word-of-mouth; event triggers only spike it

Product applications:

ContextApplicationExample
Food/BeverageLink to a daily habitKit Kat + coffee break
Productivity toolTie to a recurring workflow moment"Every Monday standup..."
Financial productLink to payday"Every time you get paid..."

Copy patterns:

  • "Every time you [frequent activity], think of..."
  • "Next time you [daily habit]..."
  • "It's [day/time] — time for..."

Ethical boundary: Build genuine, helpful associations — hijacking sensitive contexts (grief, health scares) as triggers backfires.

See: references/triggers.md when picking a cue to attach to — it has the habitat-analysis worksheet, the frequency matrix, and the 4-step trigger design process.

3. Emotion

Core concept: When we care, we share. High-arousal emotions — positive (awe, excitement, amusement) or negative (anger, anxiety) — drive sharing; low-arousal emotions (sadness, contentment) suppress it.

Why it works: Physiological arousal — racing heart, activated state — creates a need to share. It's activation vs. deactivation, not positivity vs. negativity.

Key insights:

  • High-arousal drives sharing: awe, excitement, amusement, inspiration, anger, anxiety
  • Low-arousal suppresses it: contentment and relaxation feel no urgency; sadness makes people withdraw
  • Awe is the most powerful sharing emotion — feeling small before something vast or surprising spreads furthest
  • Emotional framing — the same facts can be framed for different arousal levels; facts inform, framing motivates sharing

Product applications:

ContextApplicationExample
Launch contentEngineer awe through unexpected scale or beautyApple keynote reveals
Product demosAmusement through unexpected useBlendtec "Will It Blend?"
Social campaignsRighteous anger at an injusticeDove "Real Beauty" challenging beauty standards

Copy patterns:

  • "I can't believe [surprising fact]..."
  • "Watch what happens when..."
  • "This will change how you think about..."

Ethical boundary: Engineering outrage for clicks corrodes trust — use high-arousal negative emotion sparingly and only when the cause genuinely warrants it.

See: references/emotion.md when content feels flat — it has the emotion-sharing matrix, awe-engineering techniques, and humor design rules.

4. Public

Core concept: Built to show, built to grow. If people can see others using your product, they're more likely to adopt it — design for observability.

Why it works: Visible choices resolve uncertainty for the observer — seeing others use a product lowers their perceived risk and supplies social proof at zero marginal cost, so observability turns each user into a passive, continuous billboard.

Key insights:

  • Behavioral residue — design visible traces that outlast use: a Livestrong wristband long outlives the donation
  • Self-advertising products — every Hotmail email carried "Get your free email at Hotmail"; the product marketed itself through use
  • Public = imitable — people can only copy what they can observe; find ways to make invisible usage visible

Product applications:

ContextApplicationExample
Email/MessagingBranded signatures"Sent from my iPhone"
Physical productsVisible branding during useApple's outward-facing MacBook logo — every open laptop a billboard
SaaS toolsPublic outputs crediting the tool"Powered by [tool]" on customer sites

Copy patterns:

  • "Show the world you [achievement/identity]..."
  • "Share your [output] — powered by [brand]..."
  • "Join [number] others who..."

Ethical boundary: Visibility must empower, never shame — users always control what becomes public, and private data (failures, health, finances) stays private.

See: references/public-visibility.md when usage is invisible — it has the public-vs-private breakdown, the behavioral-residue design checklist, and the Apple-logo design lesson.

5. Practical Value

Core concept: People share useful information to help others. News you can use spreads — especially packaged for easy passing along.

Why it works: Sharing practical value is altruism — if your content saves people time, money, or effort, they'll forward it as a favor to their network.

Key insights:

  • Prospect Theory — people judge deals against reference points: $10 off a $20 item feels better than $10 off a $1,000 item
  • Rule of 100 — under $100, use percentage discounts ("50% off"); over $100, use dollar amounts ("$200 off")
  • Narrow audience = wider sharing — niche content gets forwarded to "the person who needs this"
  • Knowledge packaging — lists, how-tos, and tip collections are inherently more shareable than essays

Product applications:

ContextApplicationExample
Pricing/PromotionsFrame deals via Rule of 100"Save 40%" under $100 vs. "Save $500" over $100
Content marketingNumbered, forwardable lists"7 ways to reduce your electricity bill"
B2B contentShareable tools and benchmarksFree ROI calculator with shareable results

Copy patterns:

  • "The [number]-step guide to..."
  • "Quick tip: [immediately useful advice]..."
  • "Share this with someone who needs to hear it"

Ethical boundary: Value must be genuine — inflated "original" prices and clickbait life hacks destroy trust faster than they generate shares.

See: references/practical-value.md when framing a deal or packaging tips — it applies Prospect Theory, the Rule of 100 quick reference, and the knowledge-packaging hierarchy.

6. Stories

Core concept: People don't share information — they tell stories. Embed your idea in a narrative people want to retell, and the brand rides along like a Trojan Horse.

Why it works: Humans think in narratives, and absorption in a story lowers critical defenses — the embedded message lands where a direct pitch would bounce.

Key insights:

  • The Trojan Horse test — if someone can retell the story without your brand, the story fails; the brand must be integral
  • Retellability — the story must survive casual conversation; a 10-minute setup won't spread
  • Valuable virality — a hilarious ad nobody attributes to the brand is a failure
  • Narrative transportation — absorbed listeners accept the embedded message more readily

Product applications:

ContextApplicationExample
Brand marketingNarrative inseparable from productBlendtec "Will It Blend?" — can't retell without the brand
PR/Earned mediaInherently story-worthy stuntsBarclay Prime's $100 cheesesteak
Product launchOrigin story around a customer problem"We built this because our founder couldn't find..."

Copy patterns:

  • "Here's the story of how..."
  • "It all started when [founder/customer] realized..."
  • "Nobody believed [audacious claim] — until..."

Ethical boundary: Stories must be true or clearly fictional — fabricated testimonials and invented origins eventually surface and poison future word-of-mouth.

See: references/stories-trojan-horse.md when shaping the narrative — it has the brand-integration test and four story templates (demo, stunt, origin, customer-hero).

Engineering Word of Mouth

STEPPS principles compound when combined. See: references/case-studies.md for end-to-end STEPPS breakdowns (Blendtec, Barclay Prime, Kit Kat, Livestrong, Dove, Hotmail) when you need a worked precedent to model a campaign on.

Product Launch

PhaseSTEPPS CombinationTactics
Pre-launchSocial Currency + PublicInvite-only beta with visible waitlist
Launch dayEmotion + StoriesFounder narrative + awe-inducing demo
First weekTriggers + Practical ValueTie to daily workflow + share-to-unlock features
Sustained growthPublic + Social CurrencyVisible usage signals + achievement sharing

Content Strategy

Content TypePrimary STEPPSSecondary STEPPSExample
Thought leadershipSocial CurrencyStoriesInsider knowledge wrapped in narrative
How-to guidesPractical ValueTriggersTips tied to recurring situations
Brand filmsEmotionStoriesAwe-inspiring narrative with brand at center
Interactive toolsPractical ValuePublicCalculator/quiz with shareable results

See: references/viral-content-patterns.md when choosing a content format — it ranks formats by shareability, gives platform-specific patterns, and defines the viral coefficient.

Feature Design

Feature GoalSTEPPS to ApplyImplementation
Drive referralsSocial Currency + PublicShareable achievement cards with branding
Increase retentionTriggers + Practical ValueDaily-routine integrations with useful outputs
Build communityPublic + Social CurrencyVisible membership tiers and contribution badges
Launch virallyEmotion + StoriesRemarkable origin story + emotionally charged demo

Common Mistakes

MistakeWhy It FailsFix
Focusing only on online sharing93% of WOM is offlineDesign conversation triggers, not just share buttons
Shareable but not brand-linkedPeople share the joke, forget who made itApply the Trojan Horse test
Using low-arousal emotionsSadness and contentment don't activate sharingReframe for awe, excitement, amusement, or anger
Invisible product usageNo one imitates what they can't seeAdd behavioral residue and observable signals
Relying on product quality aloneGreat products without STEPPS spread slowlyDeliberately engineer 2-3 STEPPS into the experience
Rare, powerful triggersInfrequent cues generate less WOM than daily onesPrioritize trigger frequency over strength

Quick Diagnostic

QuestionIf No...Action
Does sharing this make people look good?No social currencyAdd remarkability, exclusivity, or achievements
Is there an everyday cue that recalls it?No triggerLink to a frequent environment or routine
Does it evoke high-arousal emotion?Low activationReframe for awe, excitement, humor, or righteous anger
Can others see people using it?Invisible usageAdd observable signals or branded outputs
Is it useful enough to forward?Low practical valuePackage as tips, lists, or tools people would send a friend
Is the brand embedded in a retellable story?No narrative vehicleCreate a Trojan Horse story that needs your brand

Further Reading

About the Author

Jonah Berger is a marketing professor at the Wharton School whose research focuses on social influence, word-of-mouth, and why things catch on. Contagious distills that research into the STEPPS framework; he also wrote Invisible Influence and The Catalyst and consults for companies from startups to the Fortune 500.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.