Code coverage
Skill viknesh20-20/claude-code-tool-kit/.claude/skills/code-coverage
Production-ready Claude Code configuration. 12 original agents, 200+ slash-command skills, 45+ MCP servers, 14 plugins, design + 3D + WebGPU + GSAP + RAG tooling. One-command Node.js installer for premium websites, SaaS apps, AI agents. Free, MIT, stack-agnostic.
npx -y skills add viknesh20-20/claude-code-tool-kit --skill code-coverageAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 5 stars5 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Analyzes test coverage, identifies untested code paths, and generates tests for the most critical uncovered areas. Use to improve test coverage before releases.
SKILL.md
2.8 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Test Coverage Analysis
Detect Test Setup
!ls package.json jest.config.* vitest.config.* .nycrc* .c8rc* .coveragerc* setup.cfg pyproject.toml tox.ini 2>/dev/null
!cat package.json 2>/dev/null | grep -E "jest|vitest|c8|nyc|istanbul|coverage" | head -5
Process
Step 1: Run Coverage (if configured)
Attempt to run the project's coverage command:
| Ecosystem | Coverage Command |
|---|---|
| npm (Jest) | npx jest --coverage --json 2>/dev/null |
| npm (Vitest) | npx vitest run --coverage 2>/dev/null |
| npm (c8) | npx c8 report --reporter=json 2>/dev/null |
| Python (pytest) | python -m pytest --cov --cov-report=json 2>/dev/null |
| Go | go test -coverprofile=coverage.out ./... 2>/dev/null && go tool cover -func=coverage.out |
| Rust | cargo tarpaulin --out json 2>/dev/null |
If coverage tools aren't configured, proceed with static analysis.
Step 2: Static Analysis (if no coverage tool)
For the target file(s):
- Identify all public functions, methods, and classes
- Search for corresponding test files
- For each function, check if there's a test that calls it
- Map which code paths (branches, error handlers) have test coverage
Step 3: Coverage Report
Summary
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Line coverage | XX% |
| Branch coverage | XX% |
| Function coverage | XX% |
| Uncovered files | X |
Uncovered Critical Code
List the most important uncovered code, prioritized by:
- Business logic — core features and workflows
- Error handling — catch blocks, error paths, edge cases
- Security-sensitive — auth, input validation, data access
- Complex logic — functions with high cyclomatic complexity
For each uncovered area:
- File path and line numbers
- What the code does
- Why it's important to test
- Suggested test cases
Step 4: Generate Missing Tests
For the top 5 most critical uncovered areas, generate test code following the project's test patterns (same structure as /write-tests).
Step 5: Coverage Improvement Plan
| Priority | File | Current | Target | Tests Needed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ... | XX% | 80%+ | ... |
| 2 | ... | XX% | 80%+ | ... |
Rules
- Focus on meaningful coverage, not 100% — test behavior, not implementation
- Prioritize business logic and error paths over boilerplate
- Don't generate tests just to increase numbers — each test should validate something valuable
- Respect existing test patterns and conventions