Business logic audit
Skill viknesh20-20/claude-code-tool-kit/.claude/skills/business-logic-audit
Production-ready Claude Code configuration. 12 original agents, 200+ slash-command skills, 45+ MCP servers, 14 plugins, design + 3D + WebGPU + GSAP + RAG tooling. One-command Node.js installer for premium websites, SaaS apps, AI agents. Free, MIT, stack-agnostic.
npx -y skills add viknesh20-20/claude-code-tool-kit --skill business-logic-auditAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 5 stars5 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Reviews existing business code (billing, multi-tenancy, state machines, inventory, GL postings, audit logs, etc.) for missing real-world edge cases. Severity-graded findings — invariant violations, race conditions, missing idempotency, currency precision bugs, audit gaps, jurisdiction issues.
SKILL.md
8.8 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
/business-logic-audit
Audit a feature or module for the edge cases that break in production. Different from /review-pr (which reviews diffs) — this skill walks code that's already shipped and looks for the failure modes the original implementer missed.
When to use
- Before scaling a feature to higher traffic / bigger customers / new regions.
- After an incident touched a business invariant.
- Before a SOC 2 / PCI / HIPAA audit.
- When taking ownership of someone else's code that handles money or regulated data.
- When a competitor's incident shows a class of failure you haven't checked for.
Operating method
1. Lock down scope
Ask:
- What feature / module / domain? Be specific — "the checkout flow," "subscription billing," "inventory reservation," "multi-tenant search."
- What's the worst-case failure? Lost charge, double charge, leaked tenant data, audit fail, etc. We'll prioritize the audit around it.
- What's the deployment context? Dev / staging / prod. Some checks (rate limits, tax) only matter in prod.
2. Walk the relevant edge-case checklist
For each finding, classify by category and severity. Categories below — pick the ones that apply.
Money handling
- All monetary values stored in minor units as integers. Critical if floats are used.
- Every monetary value has an explicit currency code. High if missing.
- Rounding rule documented at every site that rounds. Medium.
- FX rate snapshotted at transaction time. High for multi-currency.
- Refunds, adjustments, chargebacks are append-only. Critical if rows are mutated.
- Tax calculation through Stripe Tax / Avalara / TaxJar (not hand-rolled). High for non-US jurisdictions.
- Invoice numbers are sequential per legal entity, immutable once issued. High.
State machines
- Legal transitions defined in code (enum + guard) or DB constraint, not just UI. High.
- Every transition logged with actor + timestamp + before + after. High.
- Race conditions on transitions handled (row locks or unique constraints). Critical for concurrent scenarios.
- Reversible vs one-way transitions documented. Medium.
- State machine matches the real business workflow (no impossible states reachable). High.
Multi-tenancy
- Every business-data query filters by
tenant_id. Critical if any miss. - Cross-tenant access returns 404, not 403. High (existence-leak).
- At least one cross-tenant integration test exists. High.
- Tenant-scoped uniqueness (emails, slugs) enforced via composite unique index. High.
- Tenant export and delete flows exist. Medium (gating: B2B SaaS / GDPR-relevant).
Idempotency
- State-changing API endpoints accept
Idempotency-Key. Critical for charge/refund/order endpoints. - Server stores result per key for ≥ 24h, replays cached result on retry. Critical.
- Webhook receivers dedupe via stable event ID. Critical.
- Background jobs are idempotent at unit-of-work level. High.
- External-system writes (Stripe charge, email send) use provider idempotency keys. High.
Concurrency
- Optimistic locking (version column) on user-facing edits. Medium.
- Pessimistic locking on inventory / balance / queue work. Critical for inventory.
- No distributed-transaction-across-services. Use outbox pattern. High.
- Worker visibility timeout > longest expected job. High.
Audit & compliance
- Append-only audit log on regulated entities. Critical for financial / medical / customer-PII.
- Each audit entry: actor, UTC timestamp, entity ID, action, before, after, request ID. High.
- Retention policy documented per data class. High.
- Audit log access controlled — actors can't erase tracks. Critical.
- DSAR endpoint (GDPR) exists. High if EU users.
- Right-to-erasure cascades through all systems including backups. High if EU users.
API contracts
- Versioning strategy (URL or header). Medium.
- Idempotency keys on state-changing endpoints. Critical (also called out above).
- Cursor-based pagination on large/insert-heavy collections. Medium.
- Stable error codes alongside human messages. Medium.
- Rate limits per-key, per-tenant, per-IP. High.
- Sunset policy for deprecations (typically 12-month minimum). Medium.
Webhooks (outgoing)
- HMAC signing with rotatable secret. Critical.
- Retry with exponential backoff + dead-letter. High.
- Stable event IDs for receiver dedupe. High.
- Schema versioning + sunset policy. Medium.
Time
- Timestamps stored in UTC with timezone. High.
- DST-aware date math (no
+24hhacks). Medium. - Recurring schedules use rules (cron / RRULE), not pre-computed instances. Medium.
- "Now" injected for testability. Low.
File handling
- Type, size, content validated server-side. High.
- Virus scanning for user-uploaded files. High for public/shared files.
- Signed URLs for downloads; cookieless serving domain. High.
- Per-tenant quotas enforced before accepting upload. Medium.
Sessions & auth
- Session cookies
Secure,HttpOnly,SameSite=Lax. Critical for web auth. - CSRF protection on state-changing endpoints (or strict CORS for bearer-token APIs). Critical.
- Session revocation works server-side (logout invalidates the token). High.
- Idle timeout for sensitive flows. Medium.
- MFA available for admin / billing-owner roles. High for B2B SaaS.
ERP-specific (skip if N/A)
- Double-entry posting (debits = credits) enforced. Critical.
- Period-close lock prevents back-dated entries. Critical.
- 3-way match (PO + GRN + invoice) on payable. High.
- Inventory available count derived from on-hand − reserved − allocated. Critical.
- Reconciliation jobs run nightly, alert on mismatches. High.
Marketplace-specific (skip if N/A)
- KYC at seller onboarding. Critical.
- Sanctions screening on transactions. Critical for fintech.
- Payout hold for first-time sellers. High.
- Tax form generation (1099-K US) above threshold. High for US marketplace.
3. Verify, don't guess
For each item, read the code (or run a query, or check a config) before marking it. The no-hallucination rule applies — never claim "✅ this is implemented" without showing where.
For findings, cite the file and line range.
4. Severity grading
- Critical — invariant violation, money loss, data leak, regulatory breach. Fix before next release.
- High — likely incident under realistic load. Fix in current sprint.
- Medium — quality issue that compounds. Fix soon.
- Low — defense-in-depth. Track for later.
5. Compare to competitors (optional)
For categories where prior art is well-known (billing dunning, RBAC, search), include a one-line note: "Stripe handles failed payments via 4 retries / 15 days; we have 1 retry / immediate suspend, which is harsh for SMB customers."
If the user wants a deeper comparison, suggest running /competitive-analysis afterward.
Output format
## Scope
- Feature audited: <name>
- Worst-case failure considered: <description>
- Files reviewed: <list with line ranges>
## Findings (severity-ordered)
### Critical (N)
1. <category> — <issue>. <file:line>. **Fix:** <one-paragraph fix>.
2. …
### High (N)
…
### Medium (N)
…
### Low (N)
…
## What's good (specific, not generic)
- <thing 1>
- <thing 2>
## Comparison to prior art (if relevant)
- <our pattern> vs <competitor pattern> — for context only.
## Recommended next action
1. <highest-leverage critical fix — start here>
2. …
Boundaries
- Verify every claim with code, query, or config. Don't say "this is missing" without showing it's missing.
- Don't audit categories that don't apply. ERP-specific items on a SaaS app are noise.
- Don't recommend infinite complexity. Match recommendations to project stage (pre-launch, scaling, mature).
- Cite competitor patterns when borrowing recommendations. Don't say "industry standard is X" without naming who.
- Flag legal questions for the user, don't decide them. "Your retention period of 90 days may not meet US tax law's 7-year requirement — confirm with your accountant" is right; "you must use 7 years" is overreach.