Answer shapes
Portable playbook for coding agents: always-on principles, user rules, and triggered skills.
npx -y skills add Tsurai7/agentic-playbook --skill answer-shapesAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Optional output skeletons for common coding deliverables — bug fix, code review, investigation. Apply when the deliverable is one of these shapes to keep the answer complete and parseable (root cause / fix / verification, etc.); especially helps weaker models and machine-consumed handoffs. Skip for freeform questions.
SKILL.md
1.7 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Answer shapes
Lightweight, opt-in skeletons for the most common coding deliverables. They cost no always-on prefix (this body loads only when the skill fires). Use a shape when the deliverable is one of the three below — they make a weak model's answer complete and a strong model's output parseable for an orchestrator. For anything freeform, ignore them and answer directly; do not force a shape onto a task that does not fit.
Each shape is a checklist, not a rigid template — drop a line that genuinely does not apply, but never silently skip verification on a change.
Bug fix
- Root cause: what is actually wrong and why (not just the symptom).
- Fix: the change, cited as
file:line. - Verification: the command you ran (or would run) and the observed result.
Code review
- Summary: one or two sentences on what changed and overall assessment.
- Findings: one row each —
severity—file:line— issue — suggested fix. - Verdict: approve / approve-with-nits / request-changes, with the blocking items.
Investigation
- Question: the precise thing being answered.
- Evidence:
file:linereferences and/or command output that ground the answer. - Conclusion: the direct answer.
- Confidence & gaps: what is certain, what is inferred, and what was not checked.