Dev qa
Multi-agent team for Claude Code: 7 AI specialists (strategy, dev, security, sales, design, data, research) that collaborate and challenge you. Dev-cycle workflow with machine-verifiable completion.
npx -y skills add ToruAI/toru-claude-agents --skill dev-qaAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 15 stars15 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Run the project's own tests, linter, type checker and build, and report what actually failed.
SKILL.md
2.8 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Dev QA - Quality Assurance Checks
Run all quality checks: Tests → Lint → Types → Build
Philosophy
"Find bugs before they find users. Run QA early, run it often."
Flow
1. Detect Project Type
# Check what we're working with
[ -f "package.json" ] && echo "node"
[ -f "Cargo.toml" ] && echo "rust"
[ -f "pyproject.toml" ] || [ -f "requirements.txt" ] && echo "python"
[ -f "go.mod" ] && echo "go"
2. Run Checks (by project type)
Node/TypeScript
# Tests
npm test 2>&1 || yarn test 2>&1 || pnpm test 2>&1
# Lint
npm run lint 2>&1 || npx eslint . 2>&1
# Type check
npx tsc --noEmit 2>&1
# Build
npm run build 2>&1
Rust
# Tests
cargo test 2>&1
# Lint
cargo clippy -- -D warnings 2>&1
# Format check
cargo fmt --check 2>&1
# Build
cargo build 2>&1
Python
# Tests
pytest 2>&1 || python -m pytest 2>&1
# Lint
ruff check . 2>&1 || flake8 . 2>&1
# Type check
mypy . 2>&1 || pyright . 2>&1
# Format check
black --check . 2>&1 || ruff format --check . 2>&1
Go
# Tests
go test ./... 2>&1
# Lint
golangci-lint run 2>&1
# Build
go build ./... 2>&1
3. Report Results
Format output as:
## QA Report
### Tests
✓ Passed: 42
✗ Failed: 2
⊘ Skipped: 1
Failed tests:
- test_user_auth: AssertionError at line 45
- test_token_refresh: Timeout
### Lint
✓ No issues
### Type Check
⚠ 3 warnings:
- src/auth.ts:12 - Type 'any' used
- src/utils.ts:34 - Implicit return type
### Build
✓ Build successful
### Summary
Status: FAILING
Must fix: 2 test failures
Should fix: 3 type warnings
4. Next Steps
Based on results:
If all pass:
QA passed! Ready for:
- /dev-security - Security audit
- /dev-rc - Release candidate prep
- /dev-finish - Close the cycle
If failures:
QA found issues.
Options:
1. Fix now (I'll help)
2. Fix manually, run /dev-qa again
3. Continue anyway (not recommended)
If "Fix now":
- Delegate to Bob: "Fix these QA issues: {list}"
- Re-run QA after fixes
- Loop until clean
Quick Mode
For a fast check (CI-style):
/dev-qa quick
Runs only:
- Tests
- Lint
- Build
Skips:
- Verbose output
- Interactive fixing
- Type checking (if slow)
Integration with Dev Cycle
If active dev-cycle session exists:
- Log QA results to session file
- Update session phase if QA passes
## QA History
- 2026-07-15 14:30: FAILED (2 test failures)
- 2026-07-15 14:45: PASSED
What We Check
| Check | Why |
|---|---|
| Tests | Does it work? |
| Lint | Is it clean? |
| Types | Is it safe? |
| Build | Does it compile? |
Agent Involvement
- Bob: Fixes code issues found by QA
- Arlo: Reviews if test failures involve data/calculations