Branch workflow
Multi-agent team for Claude Code: 7 AI specialists (strategy, dev, security, sales, design, data, research) that collaborate and challenge you. Dev-cycle workflow with machine-verifiable completion.
npx -y skills add ToruAI/toru-claude-agents --skill branch-workflowAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 15 stars15 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Branch and commit conventions that keep an agent's work reviewable — one branch per task, main stays clean, nothing force-pushed.
SKILL.md
2.4 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Branch Workflow - Safe Autonomous Coding
All work happens on branches. Main stays clean. The user reviews before merge.
Branch Naming
feat/TASK-ID-short-description # New features
fix/TASK-ID-short-description # Bug fixes
docs/TASK-ID-short-description # Documentation
research/TASK-ID-description # Exploration
refactor/TASK-ID-description # Code improvements
Examples:
feat/API-142-rate-limitingfix/WEB-87-login-redirectdocs/API-150-auth-guide
Commit Format
TASK-ID: Brief description of change
- Detail 1
- Detail 2
Co-Authored-By: Claude <co-author>
Good commits:
- Atomic (one logical change)
- Buildable (tests pass at each commit)
- Descriptive (explains what, not how)
Workflow
Starting Work
git checkout main
git pull origin main
git checkout -b feat/TASK-ID-description
During Work
# Commit often
git add -A
git commit -m "TASK-ID: Implement X"
# Push periodically
git push -u origin feat/TASK-ID-description
Finishing Work
# Ensure tests pass
cargo test # or npm test, pytest, etc.
# Push final state
git push
# Log completion (megg or BACKLOG.md)
Rules
NEVER Do
- Push directly to main
- Force push (
git push --force) - Merge your own branches
- Delete branches without the user's approval
- Commit secrets or credentials
ALWAYS Do
- Create branch before changing code
- Run tests before pushing
- Commit with clear messages
- Push branches for review
- Document decisions
When Blocked
- Push current work to branch
- Document blocker in
.megg/blocked.mdor commit message - Move to next task
- The user will review on return
Review Workflow
The user reviews branches by:
# See all work
git branch -a
# Review specific branch
git log main..feat/BRANCH-NAME
git diff main..feat/BRANCH-NAME
# Merge if good
git checkout main
git merge feat/BRANCH-NAME
Integration with OpenSpec
For OpenSpec changes:
- Branch name matches change ID:
feat/add-plugin-system - One branch per OpenSpec change
- Archive OpenSpec change only after merge
Emergency Fixes
For critical bugs in production:
- Create
hotfix/descriptionbranch - Minimal fix only
- Tests must pass
- Document urgency in commit
- Flag for immediate user review