Hire
Use when bringing on human help - a contractor, freelancer, or first employee - or when the user says hire, job description, find a developer, outsource, delegate to a person.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add T4LEL/Claude-Arsenal --skill hireAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
3.4 KB, 740 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Hire
Scorecard before job description, job description before interviews — skip the scorecard and you hire whoever interviews best, not whoever does the job.
Copy this checklist and check off items as you complete them:
Hire Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Scorecard
- [ ] Step 2: JD draft
- [ ] Step 3: Sourcing plan
- [ ] Step 4: Interview loop
- [ ] Step 5: Contract checklist
- [ ] Report
Step 1 — Scorecard before JD
Define the outcome, not the resume. Write 3-5 measurable outcomes for what great looks like at the 90-day mark (shipped what, moved which metric by how much), plus two skill lists: required and nice-to-have. If the role's scope is fuzzy — generalist or specialist, contract or full-time, needed now or in three months — delegate to the biz-strategist agent with the business problem this hire is meant to solve.
Step 2 — JD draft
Delegate to the copywriter agent with the scorecard as input, not a blank prompt. The JD leads with the 90-day outcomes, states the stack plainly (the actual tools, not a wishlist of 15 technologies nobody uses together), and states a real compensation range — one you'd defend out loud in the interview, not a placeholder. Publishing the JD anywhere public is outward-facing: confirm with the user before posting it.
Step 3 — Sourcing plan
Rank channels for this specific role type — relevant communities, job boards, freelance platforms (Upwork/Toptal for contract work, LinkedIn for full-time), personal network — and commit to the top 2-3 rather than spraying across all of them. Name the first 3 concrete actions (post in which community, DM which 5 people, apply which platform filter) with who does each and by when.
Step 4 — Interview loop
Identical loop for every candidate — that's what makes them comparable:
- 30-minute screen: motivation for this specific role, walkthrough of relevant past work.
- PAID, timeboxed work sample pulled from the real backlog — an actual ticket or task, not a synthetic puzzle. Pay it whether or not the candidate advances.
- Score against the Step 1 scorecard with a rubric — required skills as line items, not gut feel.
Never cut the paid work sample to save time; unpaid "sample work" is a legal and trust liability, not a shortcut.
Step 5 — Contract
Delegate to the legal-advisor agent with the role type and jurisdiction for a checklist covering: IP assignment (non-negotiable — anything built for the business belongs to the business), contractor-vs-employee classification (misclassification is a real liability, not paperwork), payment terms (rate, schedule, currency), and a trial period with an explicit exit clause.
Report
- Scorecard: the 90-day outcomes and required/nice-to-have skills.
- JD draft: full text, ready to post.
- Sourcing plan: ranked channels and the first 3 concrete actions.
- Interview loop: the screen/work-sample/rubric structure for this role.
- Contract checklist: IP, classification, payment terms, trial period — flag anything needing the user's own legal review before use.
Any compensation figure or market-rate number not supplied by the user is a training-data estimate, not current data — label it an unverified assumption in the report rather than stating it as fact.
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.
Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most hr recruiting skills give in 740 tokens
Counted across 356 of the 357 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-08-07
- Quantify achievements with specific metricsin 14 of 356, across 6 files
- Keep the resume under two pagesin 14 of 356, across 6 files
- Request the full job description if not providedin 12 of 356, across 4 files
- Extract keywords and prioritize job requirementsin 12 of 356, across 4 files
- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs are missingin 12 of 356, across 5 files
- Map candidate experience to job requirementsin 11 of 356, across 3 files
- Ask if the user wants adjustmentsin 11 of 356, across 3 files
- Provide strengths and gap analysis after the resumein 10 of 356, across 2 files
- Request candidate background details if not providedin 10 of 356, across 2 files
- Format experience bullets as action verb plus resultin 10 of 356, across 2 files
- Ask for missing inputs before startingin 10 of 356, across 9 files
- Use exact job description terminologyin 9 of 356, across 1 file
Said here and by no other author read
- write three to five measurable 90-day outcomes
- list required and nice-to-have skills separately
- state the technology stack plainly
- rank sourcing channels and commit to the top few
- name the first three concrete sourcing actions
- use an identical interview loop for every candidate
Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.