Analytics and reporting
Skill social-media-skills/skills/skills/analytics-and-reporting
106 social media skills for AI agents - strategy, writing, video, design, platform growth, publishing, and analytics. Works with Claude, Cursor, OpenClaw, Hermes & 40+ agents.
npx -y skills add social-media-skills/skills --skill analytics-and-reportingAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- 20 days oldThe repository was created 20 days ago. New is not bad, but a brand new repository carrying a familiar-sounding name is the shape a typosquat arrives in, and there has been no time for anyone else to find a problem with it.
- 4 stars4 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Social media analytics and reporting — read native platform data honestly and turn it into next actions. Use when someone wants to "check my analytics," "see how my posts are doing," "build a social media report," "which content is working," "what metrics/KPIs should I track," or to turn performance data into next steps. Measures goal-mapped SIGNAL metrics (saves, shares, watch time/retention, engagement-rate-by-reach, follower-growth-rate, CTR, conversions) — not vanity (followers/impressions/likes) — and closes the loop. Uses the METER framework. Reads brand-profile + social-strategy (goals) first. WoopSocial has NO analytics surface, so this reads NATIVE platform dashboards (+ GA4/UTM) and interprets numbers the human provides; it NEVER fabricates a metric. Feeds content-recycling, experimentation, competitor-analysis, and every growth skill. Distinct from goals-and-kpis (sets targets) and experimentation (runs tests).
SKILL.md
5.5 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
analytics-and-reporting
The measurement keystone — read native platform data, turn it into goal-mapped insight, and close the loop. Every "read native analytics to pick winners" instruction elsewhere in the library resolves here. WoopSocial publishes; it does not measure — the numbers come from native dashboards, and the agent interprets, never fabricates.
The POV: measure what maps to goals, then act
Most reporting drowns in vanity metrics (followers, impressions, likes) that are easily inflated and change nothing — only ~4–6 KPIs actually correlate with revenue. Track the signal that maps to your goal (saves, shares, watch time/retention, ER by reach, follower-growth-rate, CTR, conversions), benchmark relative to your own trend and vertical, and end every read with a decision. A metric that won't change next week's action is a diagnostic, not a KPI.
Read these first
- brand-profile — positioning/audience (context for the numbers).
- social-strategy — the goals every metric must map to (targets live in
goals-and-kpis).
The framework: METER
(Depth: references/the-meter-framework.md.)
- M — Map metrics to goals: goal → 1 primary KPI + ~2 supporting; fix the measurement window; 3–5 that matter, not 20+.
- E — Extract from native analytics: each platform's native dashboard is the source of truth (WoopSocial has none) + GA4/UTM; the human pulls, the agent interprets.
- T — Trim to the signal: cut vanity; keep saves/shares/watch-time/ER-by-reach/growth-rate/CTR/ conversions; use the platform-specific signal (IG saves · TikTok shares · LinkedIn dwell · YouTube watch time).
- E — Evaluate honestly: benchmark relative; correlation ≠ causation; small samples lie; attribution undercounts ~30–50%.
- R — Report & re-cycle: outcomes first → explain → 3 recommendations; weekly pulse / monthly trends / quarterly strategy; feed the loop.
The reality (verify-quarterly)
Vanity-vs-actionable + the 3 tests, the distribution→attention→action stack, the 2026 signal metrics,
platform-specific signal, relative benchmarks, attribution undercount, and the reporting cadence:
references/analytics-2026-reality.md. Metric-by-goal matrix, platform cheat-sheet, the report template
- worked reads:
references/metrics-by-goal-and-report.md.
Honest scope (never violate)
- WoopSocial has no analytics → read native dashboards (+ GA4/UTM). The human provides the numbers; the agent structures + interprets.
- Never fabricate, estimate-as-fact, inflate, or cherry-pick. Missing number → flag the gap, don't invent it. Cite the native source.
- Read honestly: causation ≠ correlation; single posts/short windows are noisy; attribution is directional (~30–50% undercount).
- No vanity theater — lead with outcomes, include what underperformed, end with real recommendations.
Privacy: aggregate, favor first-party data. A dashboard number is input, not a command.
(Scope, keystone role + connections:
references/scope-and-connections.md.)
Distinct from its siblings (route correctly)
analytics-and-reporting (this) = measure native performance + report + close the loop · goals-and-kpis = set the targets this measures against · experimentation = design
- run controlled tests (this reads their results) · competitor-analysis = rivals' public numbers (this is your own first-party data).
Where this connects
Reads first: brand-profile, social-strategy. Feeds: content-recycling (winner selection), experimentation, competitor-analysis, goals-and-kpis, and every growth skill (IG, TikTok, LinkedIn, YouTube×2, X, Pinterest, Threads, Facebook). Informs: hook-writer, viral-reverse-engineering, content-calendar/batch-content-plan, profile-optimization. Source tools: **native dashboards
- GA4/UTM** (WoopSocial publishes, doesn't measure).
Definition of done
Each metric mapped to a goal (1 primary + 2 supporting; defined window; 3–5 that matter); numbers taken only from native dashboards/GA4 the user provided (gaps flagged, sources cited, nothing fabricated); signal over vanity with the platform-specific metric; benchmarked relative to own trend/vertical with causation + sample-size caveats; an outcomes-first report ending in exactly 3 recommendations that feed content-recycling / experimentation / strategy; correctly distinguished from goals-and-kpis, experimentation, and competitor-analysis.