Testing
Controlled, reviewable agentic coding workflows for OpenAI Codex CLI with task-specific subagents, explicit planning, TDD, and quality gates.
npx -y skills add shinpr/codex-workflows --skill testingAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Repository-aware test execution rules for TDD, observable proof, and boundary selection. Use when writing, reviewing, or fixing tests.
SKILL.md
3.5 KB, 644 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Testing
Reference
Read references/typescript.md only for TypeScript tests in web frontend work, including React, RTL, MSW, and Playwright tests. It does not apply to backend or non-web TypeScript tests.
Governing Sources
Use test commands, thresholds, boundaries, fixtures, and conventions from the repository, task, Work Plan, Design Doc, or test skeleton. When these sources are silent, select the smallest repository-supported proof without introducing a new project-wide default.
TDD Gate
For behavior-changing implementation:
- RED: Add or select a test that observes the required behavior. Run it and confirm it fails for the targeted missing behavior or regression.
- GREEN: Make the smallest implementation change that satisfies the behavior. Run the focused test.
- REFACTOR: Improve the changed code without changing the contract. Re-run the focused test.
- VERIFY: Run the repository's required quality command and every wider check required by the task boundary.
Documentation, pure configuration, and disposable exploration do not require a RED phase. A productionized spike must gain tests before completion.
Proof Selection
- Test through the public or externally observable boundary named by the acceptance criterion or proof obligation.
- Keep a dependency real when that dependency is the boundary under proof; isolate external I/O only when the selected test level permits it.
- Use integration or E2E tests for persistence, process, browser, service, or cross-component claims that unit tests cannot observe.
- A broader test does not replace a required focused check, and a focused test does not prove a wider boundary.
Capability Probe Postconditions
Evidence is substantive only when an executed assertion observes the exact consumer-visible postcondition.
- A helper result, mock call, source match, build success, or zero-test run does not prove behavior unless that is the named claim.
- Intentional absence is substantive when absence is the expected postcondition.
- State-changing behavior must assert relevant before → action → after state, including persistence or rollback semantics when applicable.
- For a changed route or alternate input path, exercise that path explicitly; evidence from another route is not interchangeable.
Test Integrity
- Keep tests deterministic, isolated, and active.
- Use meaningful assertions on results, state, or observable effects.
- Keep each existing test active with its required behavior and failure sensitivity. Change an expectation only when a cited governing source changes that behavior; replace the test only when a stronger proof covers the same failure boundary.
- Use project-scoped setup and guaranteed cleanup for mutated state or external resources.
- Treat coverage as diagnostic unless a governing source defines a threshold.
Completion Gate
- Focused tests pass; when the TDD Gate applies, RED failed for the targeted missing behavior or regression; otherwise RED is recorded as not applicable with the reason
- Required integration/E2E boundary is exercised
- Every cited behavior has a consumer-visible capability probe
- Repository-defined quality commands pass
- No required test is skipped, hollow, or dependent on execution order
- Mutated state and resources are restored
What ships with it: 2 files
2.8 KB alongside SKILL.md
agents/
- openai.yaml200 B
references/
- typescript.md2.7 KB