Value investing scorecard
Skill serejaris/kimi-skills/skills/value-investing-scorecard
Buffett/Graham value investing scorecard — evaluates a company across 20 criteria in four dimensions (moat, management, financials, valuation) for a 0-100 score. Triggered when users request a value-investing analysis, fundamental scoring, moat assessment, or ask 'is this company worth investing in', 'analyze the fundamentals of XX', or 'evaluate this using Buffett's method'.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add serejaris/kimi-skills --skill value-investing-scorecardAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- 23 days oldThe repository was created 23 days ago. New is not bad, but a brand new repository carrying a familiar-sounding name is the shape a typosquat arrives in, and there has been no time for anyone else to find a problem with it.
- 5 stars5 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its file declares
Copied from the file, not written here
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
18.3 KB, ~4.0k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Buffett / Graham Value Investing Scorecard
A systematic 20-item value investing evaluation framework built on the investment philosophies of Warren Buffett and Benjamin Graham. It covers four dimensions — Moat, Management, Financials, and Valuation — scoring each criterion for a target company to support rational investment decisions.
How to Use
- The user provides a target company name or stock ticker
- Evaluate the company against all 20 criteria below
- Score each item: 1 (Poor) / 2 (Below Average) / 3 (Good) / 4 (Excellent) / 5 (Outstanding)
- Total possible score is 100; provide an overall rating at the end
Rating Scale
| Score Range | Rating | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| 85–100 | ★★★★★ Outstanding | Strong candidate — wait for a fair entry price |
| 70–84 | ★★★★ Excellent | Worthy of deep research; add to watchlist |
| 55–69 | ★★★ Average | Some risks present — carefully assess weaknesses |
| 40–54 | ★★ Weak | Does not meet value investing criteria; consider avoiding |
| < 40 | ★ Poor | Clearly not suitable for long-term holding |
I. Moat — 5 Items
Buffett: "The most important thing is determining the competitive advantage of a business, and above all, the durability of that advantage."
1. Brand Value & Consumer Mindshare
Key Questions:
- Do consumers choose this brand almost reflexively? (e.g., Coca-Cola, Apple)
- Does the brand have pricing power — can it raise prices without significantly losing volume?
- Does brand recognition span geographies and generations?
Scoring Guide:
- 5: Globally or nationally dominant brand with clear pricing power
- 3: Well-known within the industry, but limited pricing power
- 1: No brand recognition; competes purely on price
2. Switching Costs
Key Questions:
- How costly is it for customers to switch suppliers? (money, time, learning curve, data migration)
- Is the product deeply embedded in the customer's workflow or business systems?
- Are there contractual lock-ins, technical dependencies, or ecosystem ties?
Scoring Guide:
- 5: Extremely high switching costs — customers are virtually locked in (e.g., ERP systems, core banking platforms)
- 3: Moderate switching costs, but competitors can pry customers away with large incentives
- 1: Zero switching costs — customers can leave at any time
3. Network Effects
Key Questions:
- Does each new user increase the value for existing users?
- Are there two-sided market dynamics (more buyers attract more sellers, and vice versa)?
- Has the network reached critical mass, creating a winner-take-all dynamic?
Scoring Guide:
- 5: Strong two-sided network effects with monopoly or oligopoly dynamics (e.g., Visa's payment network)
- 3: Network effects present but not yet an absolute barrier
- 1: No network effects — product value is independent of user count
4. Cost Advantage & Economies of Scale
Key Questions:
- Is the company the lowest-cost producer in its industry?
- Does scaling up bring declining marginal costs?
- Is the cost advantage structural (resource endowments, patented processes, geographic location) rather than temporary?
Scoring Guide:
- 5: Structural cost advantage that competitors cannot replicate (e.g., Saudi Aramco's oil extraction costs)
- 3: Some scale advantage, but peers are not far behind
- 1: Cost structure on par with or higher than competitors
5. Barriers to Entry
Key Questions:
- How much capital would a new entrant need?
- Are there licensing, patent, or regulatory barriers?
- Is there a technology or know-how barrier?
- Has any successful new entrant disrupted the industry in the past 10 years?
Scoring Guide:
- 5: Extremely high barriers; no credible new entrant in the last decade (e.g., railroads, utilities)
- 3: Moderate barriers; occasional new entrants but unable to unseat leaders
- 1: Low barriers; new players flood in frequently
II. Management — 5 Items
Buffett: "I try to invest in businesses so good that even a fool can run them — because sooner or later, one will."
6. Management Integrity & Alignment with Shareholders
Key Questions:
- Does management candidly disclose risks and problems?
- Are there related-party transactions, self-dealing, or excessive compensation?
- Do management's actions match their words — have past promises been kept?
- How transparent and timely are disclosures?
Scoring Guide:
- 5: Highly principled management; proactively discloses bad news; compensation tied to performance
- 3: Generally acceptable, with occasional disclosure gaps
- 1: Integrity concerns on record; complex related-party transactions; questionable governance
7. Capital Allocation Skill
Key Questions:
- How does management deploy retained earnings? (reinvestment vs. dividends vs. buybacks vs. acquisitions)
- Have past acquisitions created value? Were acquisition multiples reasonable?
- Does ROIC consistently exceed WACC?
- Has management avoided large capex binges at cycle peaks?
Scoring Guide:
- 5: Outstanding capital allocation; long-term ROIC well above WACC; excellent M&A track record
- 3: Reasonable capital allocation with occasional missteps
- 1: Frequent value-destroying acquisitions or peak-cycle overexpansion
8. Insider Ownership & Buying Activity
Key Questions:
- What is the combined ownership stake of management and the board?
- Over the past 1–3 years, have insiders been net buyers or net sellers?
- Is ownership from open-market purchases (not just options)?
Scoring Guide:
- 5: Large insider ownership with continued buying — interests tightly aligned
- 3: Moderate ownership; neutral buying/selling activity
- 1: Persistent insider selling or negligible ownership
9. Management Track Record
Key Questions:
- How long has the CEO / core leadership been in place?
- How has the company performed (revenue, profit, share price) during their tenure?
- Has leadership successfully steered the company through industry downturns?
- How does management's execution compare to peers?
Scoring Guide:
- 5: Long tenure spanning multiple cycles; consistently outperforms the industry
- 3: Performance roughly in line with the industry average
- 1: Frequent leadership turnover, or persistent underperformance vs. peers
10. Corporate Culture & Succession Planning
Key Questions:
- Does the company have a clear mission, vision, and values that are genuinely practiced?
- How are employee satisfaction and talent retention?
- Is there a well-defined succession plan? Could the company run smoothly if the CEO left tomorrow?
- Is the organization capable of learning and adapting to change?
Scoring Guide:
- 5: Outstanding culture; robust succession plan; highly resilient organization
- 3: Reasonable culture; basic succession framework in place
- 1: Heavily reliant on one individual; no succession plan; high employee turnover
III. Financials — 5 Items
Graham: "An investment operation is one which, upon thorough analysis, promises safety of principal and an adequate return."
11. Long-Term ROE Consistency
Key Questions:
- Has ROE been consistently above 15% over the past 10 years?
- What drives ROE: high margins, high asset turnover, or high leverage? (DuPont analysis)
- Is the ROE trend stable/rising or declining?
- How does it compare to the industry average?
Scoring Guide:
- 5: ROE above 20% for 10 consecutive years, driven mainly by high margins and turnover
- 3: ROE fluctuates between 12%–18%, partly reliant on leverage
- 1: ROE consistently below 10% or highly volatile
12. Debt Levels & Solvency
Key Questions:
- Is the debt-to-asset ratio within a reasonable range for the industry?
- Is interest-bearing debt / EBITDA below 3×?
- Is the interest coverage ratio (EBIT / interest expense) above 5×?
- Short-term solvency: are the current and quick ratios healthy?
- Is the debt maturity profile well-spread, or is there concentration risk?
Scoring Guide:
- 5: Low debt or net cash position; interest coverage above 10×
- 3: Moderate debt; interest coverage 3–6×
- 1: High leverage; significant debt-service pressure; default risk
13. Free Cash Flow Generation
Key Questions:
- Has the company consistently produced positive free cash flow (FCF = operating cash flow − capex) over the past 5–10 years?
- Is FCF trending upward?
- Is FCF / net income above 80%? (measures cash quality of earnings)
- What is the split between maintenance capex and growth capex?
Scoring Guide:
- 5: Positive and steadily growing FCF for 10 consecutive years; FCF/net income above 90%
- 3: FCF positive in most years, with occasional fluctuations
- 1: FCF frequently negative; heavily dependent on external financing
14. Gross & Net Margin Trends
Key Questions:
- Is the gross margin stable or trending upward? (reflects pricing power and cost control)
- Where does the net margin rank within the industry?
- How volatile are margins? Are they highly cyclical?
- Are operating expenses (SG&A, R&D) well-controlled?
Scoring Guide:
- 5: Gross margin above 40% and stable over time; industry-leading net margin
- 3: Gross margin 20%–40%; average net margin
- 1: Gross margin below 20% and declining; razor-thin or negative net margin
15. Earnings Quality (Operating Cash Flow vs. Net Income)
Key Questions:
- Is operating cash flow / net income above 1×? (Are receivables and inventory healthy?)
- Are accounts receivable days trending worse?
- Are inventory days rising, indicating a buildup?
- Are there large non-recurring items or accounting adjustments inflating profits?
Scoring Guide:
- 5: Cash flow / net income above 1.2×; excellent receivables and inventory management; no accounting red flags
- 3: Cash flow / net income in the 0.8–1.1× range; occasional receivables growth
- 1: Cash flow / net income below 0.7×; surging receivables or bloated inventory
IV. Valuation — 5 Items
Graham: "The function of the margin of safety is, in essence, to make an accurate forecast of the future unnecessary."
16. Margin of Safety (Intrinsic Value vs. Market Price)
Key Questions:
- What is the estimated intrinsic value using DCF or an earnings-power model?
- Is the current price more than 25% below intrinsic value?
- Are the assumptions conservative? (growth rate, discount rate, terminal multiple)
- In the most pessimistic scenario, how large is the downside?
Scoring Guide:
- 5: Price more than 30% below conservative intrinsic value estimate — ample margin of safety
- 3: Price near fair value; margin of safety 10%–20%
- 1: Price above intrinsic value; no margin of safety or bubble territory
17. PE / PB Historical Percentile
Key Questions:
- Where does the current PE (price-to-earnings) sit relative to its 5–10 year range?
- Where does the current PB (price-to-book) sit historically?
- Is the valuation below the industry average and comparable peers?
- Is PE distorted by one-time or non-recurring items?
Scoring Guide:
- 5: PE/PB in the bottom 10% of their historical range; clearly below the industry average
- 3: PE/PB in the 30%–60% percentile range; neutral valuation
- 1: PE/PB in the top 20% of their historical range; expensive
18. Free Cash Flow Yield
Key Questions:
- FCF Yield = free cash flow / market cap — is it above 5%?
- Does it offer a significant premium over the 10-year government bond yield?
- Is FCF Yield improving or deteriorating?
Scoring Guide:
- 5: FCF Yield above 8%; well above the risk-free rate
- 3: FCF Yield between 4%–6%; slightly above the risk-free rate
- 1: FCF Yield below 2%; even lower than the risk-free rate
19. Earnings Yield vs. Risk-Free Rate
Key Questions:
- Is the earnings yield (E/P = 1/PE) meaningfully above the 10-year government bond yield?
- Graham's guideline: E/P should be at least 2× the risk-free rate
- In the current interest rate environment, how attractive are equities relative to bonds?
Scoring Guide:
- 5: E/P exceeds 2.5× the risk-free rate — highly attractive
- 3: E/P is roughly 1.5–2× the risk-free rate — moderately attractive
- 1: E/P below the risk-free rate — bonds look better
20. Dividend Yield & Dividend Growth
Key Questions:
- What is the current dividend yield? Is it above 2%?
- Has the dividend grown for multiple consecutive years? At what rate?
- Is the payout ratio sustainable? (below 70% is preferable)
- Does the company have a clear shareholder return policy (dividends + buybacks)?
Scoring Guide:
- 5: Dividend yield above 3%; 10+ consecutive years of growth; payout ratio below 60%
- 3: Dividend yield 1%–3%; growth is inconsistent
- 1: No dividend, or an extremely low yield with no growth
Output Format
After completing the evaluation, present the results in the following format:
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
[Company Name] Value Investing Scorecard
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
I. Moat Subtotal: __/25
┌──────────────────────────────┬──────┬────────────────┐
│ Criterion │ Score│ Brief Note │
├──────────────────────────────┼──────┼────────────────┤
│ 1. Brand Value & Mindshare │ _/5 │ │
│ 2. Switching Costs │ _/5 │ │
│ 3. Network Effects │ _/5 │ │
│ 4. Cost Advantage & Scale │ _/5 │ │
│ 5. Barriers to Entry │ _/5 │ │
└──────────────────────────────┴──────┴────────────────┘
II. Management Subtotal: __/25
┌──────────────────────────────┬──────┬────────────────┐
│ Criterion │ Score│ Brief Note │
├──────────────────────────────┼──────┼────────────────┤
│ 6. Integrity & Alignment │ _/5 │ │
│ 7. Capital Allocation │ _/5 │ │
│ 8. Insider Ownership │ _/5 │ │
│ 9. Track Record │ _/5 │ │
│ 10. Culture & Succession │ _/5 │ │
└──────────────────────────────┴──────┴────────────────┘
III. Financials Subtotal: __/25
┌──────────────────────────────┬──────┬────────────────┐
│ Criterion │ Score│ Brief Note │
├──────────────────────────────┼──────┼────────────────┤
│ 11. Long-Term ROE │ _/5 │ │
│ 12. Debt & Solvency │ _/5 │ │
│ 13. Free Cash Flow │ _/5 │ │
│ 14. Margin Trends │ _/5 │ │
│ 15. Earnings Quality │ _/5 │ │
└──────────────────────────────┴──────┴────────────────┘
IV. Valuation Subtotal: __/25
┌──────────────────────────────┬──────┬────────────────┐
│ Criterion │ Score│ Brief Note │
├──────────────────────────────┼──────┼────────────────┤
│ 16. Margin of Safety │ _/5 │ │
│ 17. PE/PB Percentile │ _/5 │ │
│ 18. FCF Yield │ _/5 │ │
│ 19. Earnings Yield vs Rf │ _/5 │ │
│ 20. Dividend Yield & Growth │ _/5 │ │
└──────────────────────────────┴──────┴────────────────┘
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
Total: __/100 Rating: ★★★★★
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
【Overall Assessment】
(2–3 paragraphs summarizing the company's investment merit, core strengths, key risks, and recommendations)
【Key Risk Warnings】
- Risk 1
- Risk 2
- Risk 3
【Investment Recommendation】
(Provide a clear recommendation: Strong Candidate / Worth Researching / Proceed with Caution / Avoid)
Disclaimer
This scorecard is an analytical framework only and does not constitute investment advice. Investing involves risk; decisions should be made carefully. All scores are qualitative judgments and should be used alongside quantitative data and professional analysis.
What ships with it: 1 file
1.1 KB alongside SKILL.md
- LICENSE1.1 KB