Assignment general

Skill scholarly360/contract-intelligence/skills/assignment-general

Agent skills for contract clause analysis with industry

Install

npx -y skills add scholarly360/contract-intelligence --skill assignment-general

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Governs whether a party may transfer its rights or obligations under the contract to a third party. Typically requires prior written consent to ensure the other party retains control over who they do business with.

SKILL.md

2.3 KB, 464 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Assignment Clause -- General

This skill provides expert-level analysis and drafting assistance for Assignment clauses in General contracts.

When to Activate

Activate this skill when the user:

Uploads or pastes a contract containing a Assignment clause
Asks to draft, redline, or improve a Assignment clause
Asks for a risk assessment of an existing Assignment provision
Mentions keywords: assignment clause, transfer of rights, assignability

Workflow

Step 1 -- Intake

Ask the user (if not already provided):

Which party are you representing? (e.g., vendor, client, buyer, seller)
Jurisdiction governing the contract? (e.g., New York, California, England & Wales)
Is this a draft for review or should I generate fresh language?

Step 2 -- Analysis

If reviewing existing language, output the following structure:

## Assignment Clause Analysis

### Plain-Language Summary
[2-3 sentence plain-English description of what the clause does]

### Key Provisions Identified
- [Provision 1]
- [Provision 2]

### Risk Assessment
| Item | Risk Level | Notes |
|------|-----------|-------|
| [item] | High / Medium / Low | [explanation] |

### Recommended Redlines
[Specific suggested changes with rationale]

### Market Standard Comparison
[How this clause compares to typical General market standard]

Step 3 -- Drafting

If generating new language, produce:

Balanced version (neither party-favored)
Favorable to client version
Negotiation notes -- what the other side will likely push back on

Assignment Playbook -- General

See scripts/playbook.md for detailed clause-specific guidance, fallback positions, jurisdiction-specific notes, and precedent language.

Important Notes

Always caveat that output is not legal advice and should be reviewed by qualified counsel.
Flag any provisions that may be unenforceable or jurisdiction-specific.
When jurisdiction is unknown, apply general common-law principles and note assumptions.