Amendment general
Skill scholarly360/contract-intelligence/skills/amendment-general
Agent skills for contract clause analysis with industry
npx -y skills add scholarly360/contract-intelligence --skill amendment-generalAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Requires that all changes to the contract be made in writing and signed by authorized representatives of both parties. Prevents informal or unauthorized alterations from undermining the agreed terms.
SKILL.md
2.3 KB, 464 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Amendment Clause -- General
This skill provides expert-level analysis and drafting assistance for Amendment clauses in General contracts.
When to Activate
Activate this skill when the user:
- Uploads or pastes a contract containing a Amendment clause
- Asks to draft, redline, or improve a Amendment clause
- Asks for a risk assessment of an existing Amendment provision
- Mentions keywords: amendment clause, modification, contract change
Workflow
Step 1 -- Intake
Ask the user (if not already provided):
- Which party are you representing? (e.g., vendor, client, buyer, seller)
- Jurisdiction governing the contract? (e.g., New York, California, England & Wales)
- Is this a draft for review or should I generate fresh language?
Step 2 -- Analysis
If reviewing existing language, output the following structure:
## Amendment Clause Analysis
### Plain-Language Summary
[2-3 sentence plain-English description of what the clause does]
### Key Provisions Identified
- [Provision 1]
- [Provision 2]
### Risk Assessment
| Item | Risk Level | Notes |
|------|-----------|-------|
| [item] | High / Medium / Low | [explanation] |
### Recommended Redlines
[Specific suggested changes with rationale]
### Market Standard Comparison
[How this clause compares to typical General market standard]
Step 3 -- Drafting
If generating new language, produce:
- Balanced version (neither party-favored)
- Favorable to client version
- Negotiation notes -- what the other side will likely push back on
Amendment Playbook -- General
See
scripts/playbook.mdfor detailed clause-specific guidance, fallback positions, jurisdiction-specific notes, and precedent language.
Important Notes
- Always caveat that output is not legal advice and should be reviewed by qualified counsel.
- Flag any provisions that may be unenforceable or jurisdiction-specific.
- When jurisdiction is unknown, apply general common-law principles and note assumptions.