Sf test scenario generator

SF Test Scenario Generator

Generate realistic, coverage-complete test scenarios from your actual business rules, not generic templates.

When to Use

• Preparing for UAT before a release
• Building a regression test suite
• Onboarding new testers who don't know the configuration
• Proving to auditors that all business rules have test coverage
• After a business rule change -- regenerate affected scenarios

Prerequisites

• Business rule configuration export
• Workflow/approval process definitions
• Knowledge of which rules changed (for targeted regeneration)

Workflow

Step 1: Parse Configuration

Extract from business rules:

• Trigger conditions (when does the rule fire?)
• Field reads (what data does it check?)
• Field writes (what data does it set?)
• Error/raise conditions (what should it block?)

Step 2: Generate Scenarios

For each rule, generate:

• Happy path: all conditions met, rule fires successfully
• Edge case -- null input: what if the checked field is empty?
• Edge case -- boundary: what if the value is at the max/min?
• Error condition: what if the rule should block the save?
• Cross-rule interaction: what if Rule A and Rule B fire together?

Step 3: Build Test Cases

Each test case includes:

• Pre-conditions (data setup needed)
• Test steps (exactly what to do in the UI)
• Expected result (what the system should do)
• Test data (which employee, which values)
• Rules validated (traceability to specific business rules)

Step 4: Produce Traceability Matrix

Map every business rule to at least one test case. For audit sign-off, show:

• Rule ID → Test Case ID
• Coverage status (covered / partial / uncovered)
• Last run date

Edge Cases

• Effective-dated rules: generate scenarios across effective date boundaries
• Compound rules (A AND B AND C): test all false combinations, not just all true
• Workflows with external approvers: test what happens when the external system is down
• Propagation cascades: test rules that trigger other rules through 3+ levels
• Dynamic role resolution: test with different role assignments (manager, HRBP, etc.)
• Off-cycle events: mid-period changes, retroactive updates, future-dated changes

Common Pitfalls

1. Only testing the happy path: 80% of production issues come from edge cases. Generate at least one edge case per rule.
2. No cross-rule scenarios: Rules don't execute in isolation. Test the combinations that happen in real workflows.
3. Missing test data setup: A scenario that says "change department to Sales" but no employee is in a non-Sales department to start with is useless.
4. Not covering error conditions: If a rule is supposed to block invalid data, test that it actually blocks it.
5. Forgetting propagation rules: A Person rule that sets a field used by a Position rule -- test the full chain, not each rule alone.

Verification Checklist

• Every business rule has at least one test scenario
• Happy path and edge case coverage >90%
• Cross-rule interaction scenarios included
• Test data requirements documented per scenario
• Traceability matrix produced
• Error/block conditions tested
• Propagation chains tested end-to-end