Support operations
Startup OS - Collection of Claude Code skills
npx -y skills add ncklrs/startup-os-skills --skill support-operationsAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Expert support operations guidance for customer service excellence. Use when designing ticket management systems, creating SLA policies, building support tier structures (L1/L2/L3), optimizing knowledge bases, defining severity levels and escalation procedures, implementing support metrics (CSAT, FRT, TTR, FCR), configuring support tool stacks, or building support-to-CS feedback loops. Covers Zendesk, Intercom, Freshdesk, and help desk best practices.
SKILL.md
8.6 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Support Operations
Strategic support operations expertise for customer-facing teams — from ticket management and SLA design to escalation workflows and self-service optimization.
Philosophy
Great support isn't about closing tickets fast. It's about solving customer problems permanently while building scalable systems.
The best support operations teams:
- Prevent before they support — Self-service and proactive help reduce ticket volume
- Measure what drives loyalty — Resolution quality beats response speed
- Escalate with context — Every handoff preserves customer history
- Feed insights upstream — Support data drives product and success improvements
How This Skill Works
When invoked, apply the guidelines in rules/ organized by:
ticket-*— Ticket management, prioritization, queue optimizationsla-*— SLA design, compliance monitoring, escalation triggerstier-*— Support tier structure, skill-based routing, specializationknowledge-*— Knowledge base strategy, self-service, deflectionmetrics-*— CSAT, FRT, TTR, FCR, quality scoringescalation-*— Severity definitions, escalation paths, incident managementtooling-*— Support stack optimization, integrations, automationfeedback-*— Support-to-CS handoffs, product feedback loops, voice of customer
Core Frameworks
The Support Operations Hierarchy
| Level | Focus | Metrics | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tickets | Individual resolution | Handle time, CSAT | Agents |
| Queue | Flow optimization | Wait time, backlog | Team leads |
| Channel | Channel effectiveness | Deflection, containment | Managers |
| Operations | System performance | Cost per ticket, NPS | Directors |
| Strategy | Business impact | Retention, expansion | VP/C-level |
The Support Tier Model
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ TIER 3 (L3) │
│ Engineering escalation, code-level issues, custom development │
│ Target: <5% of tickets | SLA: Best effort │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ TIER 2 (L2) │
│ Technical specialists, complex troubleshooting, integrations │
│ Target: 15-25% of tickets | SLA: 4-8 hours │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ TIER 1 (L1) │
│ First response, common issues, documentation guidance │
│ Target: 60-80% resolution | SLA: 15-60 minutes │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ SELF-SERVICE (L0) │
│ Knowledge base, chatbots, community forums, in-app help │
│ Target: 30-50% deflection | SLA: Instant │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Ticket Priority Matrix
| Priority | Business Impact | Response SLA | Resolution SLA | Examples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 Critical | Complete outage, data loss | 15 min | 4 hours | System down, security breach |
| P2 High | Major feature broken | 1 hour | 8 hours | Key workflow blocked |
| P3 Medium | Feature impaired | 4 hours | 24 hours | Partial functionality |
| P4 Low | Minor issue, cosmetic | 8 hours | 72 hours | UI bug, minor inconvenience |
| P5 Request | Feature request, how-to | 24 hours | 5 days | Enhancement, training |
Support Metrics Framework
| Metric | Definition | Target | Warning |
|---|---|---|---|
| CSAT | Customer satisfaction score | 90%+ | <85% |
| FRT | First response time | <1 hour | >4 hours |
| TTR | Time to resolution | <24 hours | >72 hours |
| FCR | First contact resolution | 70%+ | <50% |
| NPS | Net promoter score | 30+ | <10 |
| Ticket Volume | Tickets per 100 customers | 5-15 | >25 |
| Deflection Rate | Self-service success | 30-50% | <20% |
| Escalation Rate | Tickets escalated | 10-20% | >30% |
| Reopen Rate | Tickets reopened | <5% | >10% |
| Agent Utilization | Productive time | 70-80% | <60% or >90% |
The Ticket Lifecycle
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ │
│ NEW → TRIAGED → ASSIGNED → IN PROGRESS → PENDING → RESOLVED │
│ │ │ │
│ ▼ ▼ │
│ ESCALATED WAITING │
│ │ (Customer) │
│ ▼ │
│ ENGINEERING │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Channel Strategy Matrix
| Channel | Best For | Cost | Scalability | Personal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-service | Common issues | Lowest | Highest | Lowest |
| Chatbot | Quick questions | Low | High | Low |
| Live chat | Real-time help | Medium | Medium | Medium |
| Email/Ticket | Complex issues | Medium | Medium | Medium |
| Phone | Urgent/sensitive | High | Low | High |
| Video | Technical demos | High | Low | Highest |
Severity Levels
| Severity | Definition | Escalation Path | Communication |
|---|---|---|---|
| SEV1 | System-wide outage | Immediate to engineering + exec | Status page, proactive email |
| SEV2 | Major feature broken | 1 hour to L3 | Affected users notified |
| SEV3 | Feature degraded | 4 hours to L2 | Standard ticket updates |
| SEV4 | Minor impact | Normal queue | Standard ticket updates |
Key Formulas
Cost Per Ticket
Cost Per Ticket = (Total Support Cost) / (Total Tickets Handled)
Target: $5-25 depending on complexity
Support Capacity Planning
Required Agents = (Ticket Volume × Handle Time) / (Available Hours × Utilization Rate)
Example:
(500 tickets × 20 min) / (8 hours × 60 min × 0.75) = 28 agents
Self-Service ROI
Savings = (Deflected Tickets × Cost Per Ticket) - Self-Service Investment
Anti-Patterns
- Speed over quality — Fast wrong answers create repeat contacts
- Ticket tennis — Multiple handoffs without resolution
- Knowledge hoarding — Solutions in heads, not documentation
- Metric gaming — Closing tickets prematurely to hit targets
- Escalation avoidance — L1 struggling when L2 is needed
- Channel forcing — Making customers switch channels unnecessarily
- Copy-paste responses — Generic answers that don't address the issue
- Invisible backlog — Tickets aging without visibility
- No feedback loop — Support insights never reach product
- Over-automation — Bots handling issues that need humans