Review address comments
21 markdown-first software delivery workflow skills for Claude Code, Codex, and compatible agents. Standalone skill kit covering planning, debugging, CI, review, security, rollout, performance, data quality, and post-incident workflows.
npx -y skills add motao123/dev-workflow-kit --skill review-address-commentsAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use when review comments, requested changes, or PR feedback must be processed systematically. This skill groups comments, decides what to accept, and turns feedback into verified edits instead of ad hoc reactions.
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
1.7 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Review Address Comments
Use this skill when collaboration after implementation becomes the main task.
Trigger Conditions
Use this skill when:
- a PR has reviewer comments
- the user asks to address requested changes
- feedback needs to be grouped or prioritized
- multiple comment threads refer to overlapping concerns
- the branch needs a clear resolution summary after edits
Do not use this skill for initial implementation planning or for pure status lookups without feedback to process.
Workflow
- Gather the comments and group them by theme.
- Distinguish must-fix issues from optional suggestions.
- Identify overlapping comments and consolidate the work.
- Apply the smallest changes that resolve accepted feedback.
- Verify each changed area.
- Summarize what was addressed and any intentional non-changes.
Output
For non-trivial work, provide:
- grouped feedback themes
- accepted vs deferred items
- edit plan
- verification evidence
- resolution summary
Coordination
After comment processing:
- hand off to the active coding workflow for implementation edits
- use
fix-ciif review-triggered changes break automation - use
ship-readinessbefore final merge
Invocation Examples
- "Use review-address-comments to classify and resolve this PR feedback."
- "Use review-address-comments and turn these requested changes into an action list."
- "Use review-address-comments after the last review round and summarize what remains."