Dependency compliance audit
21 markdown-first software delivery workflow skills for Claude Code, Codex, and compatible agents. Standalone skill kit covering planning, debugging, CI, review, security, rollout, performance, data quality, and post-incident workflows.
npx -y skills add motao123/dev-workflow-kit --skill dependency-compliance-auditAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use when the main question is whether a third-party dependency is acceptable to adopt, upgrade, keep, or ship. This skill focuses on package risk, license or policy fit, supply-chain awareness, and recommended next actions.
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
2.0 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Dependency Compliance Audit
Use this skill when package choice or package governance is the main blocker.
Trigger Conditions
Use this skill when:
- the user asks whether a new dependency is safe or acceptable to adopt
- license, policy, provenance, or supply-chain concerns are in scope
- a stale, risky, or vulnerable package needs to be evaluated
- package upgrade pressure is affecting release confidence
- the team needs a dependency-focused review before merge or release
Do not use this skill for general code security review, product design, or final release signoff across the whole change.
Workflow
- Identify the dependency or dependency set under review.
- Clarify whether the concern is security, license, policy, maintenance, provenance, or upgrade compatibility.
- Separate direct dependency concerns from broader code-path concerns.
- Classify risk and likely decision options.
- Recommend the smallest next action with the best tradeoff.
- Suggest any follow-up review or documentation needed.
Output
For non-trivial work, provide:
- dependency scope reviewed
- main risk categories
- likely policy or release concerns
- recommended decision path
- follow-up verification or documentation
Coordination
After audit:
- use
security-reviewif dependency concerns expand into runtime trust-boundary issues - use
docs-writerif policy or migration notes should be recorded - use
ship-readinessif package choice remains a release blocker
Invocation Examples
- "Use dependency-compliance-audit to review whether this new package is safe to adopt."
- "Use dependency-compliance-audit because the main concern is license and supply-chain fit."
- "Use dependency-compliance-audit to assess whether this outdated package is still acceptable for release."