Brand voice
Agent-native marketing CLI: 58 skills, 5 research agents, brand memory that compounds across sessions, and a local Studio dashboard. One npm install, then /cmo in your coding agent.
npx -y skills add MoizIbnYousaf/marketing-cli --skill brand-voiceAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Define or extract a consistent brand voice that other skills can use. Three modes: Extract (analyze existing content), Build (interview-based), Auto-Scrape (from URL). Use when copy sounds generic, when starting any new project, when voice feels inconsistent across channels, when onboarding a new brand, or when any skill needs voice-profile.md but it doesn't exist yet. This is always the first skill to run for a new project. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user mentions tone of voice, brand personality, 'my copy all sounds the same', 'how should I sound', 'analyze my website voice', 'define my tone', or anything about making content sound more human or distinctive. Even if the user just says 'my marketing sounds generic' — that's a voice problem.
SKILL.md
10.0 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
/brand-voice -- Brand Voice Engine
Generic copy converts worse than copy with a distinct voice. Not because the words are different -- because the reader feels like they're hearing from a PERSON, not a marketing team.
This skill defines that voice. Either by extracting it from existing content, building it strategically from scratch, or auto-scraping a URL to analyze a brand's public presence.
For output formatting, see /cmo rules/output-format.md.
On Activation
- Read
brand/context:- positioning.md — If available, use market angles to inform voice differentiation. A brand positioned as "the anti-course course" needs a different voice than one positioned as "enterprise-grade."
- audience.md — If available, tailor vocabulary and tone to the target reader. Technical builders get different language than busy executives.
- If neither exists, proceed with defaults. Ask the user about their market and audience during the question sequence.
- Check if
./brand/voice-profile.mdalready exists:- Exists → Update mode: show current profile summary, ask what to change.
- Does not exist → Proceed to Mode Selection below.
- Assess the user's request to determine which mode to use (Extract, Build, or Auto-Scrape).
Three Modes
Mode 1: Extract (analyze existing content)
User provides 3-5 pieces of existing content (blog posts, emails, social posts, about page, etc).
The analysis process:
- Read all provided content -- look for patterns, not individual word choices
- Identify the voice DNA:
- Sentence structure (short/punchy vs. flowing/complex)
- Vocabulary level (everyday vs. technical vs. academic)
- Emotional register (warm/friendly vs. authoritative vs. irreverent)
- Perspective (first-person storytelling vs. objective analysis)
- Rhythm (varies sentence length? staccato? musical?)
- Map the personality axes (see Voice DNA Framework below)
- Generate the voice profile
- Write to ./brand/voice-profile.md
Mode 2: Build (construct from scratch)
No existing content. Build voice strategically through guided questions.
The question sequence:
- "If your brand were a person at a dinner party, how would they talk?"
- "Who is your audience? Technical builders, creative professionals, busy executives, everyday consumers, or a mix?"
- "Name 2-3 brands whose tone you admire (not their product -- their VOICE)."
- "What words should NEVER appear in your marketing? What feels off-brand?"
- "Show me something you've written that felt 'right' -- even a Slack message or email."
Mode 3: Auto-Scrape (URL analysis)
User provides a URL. Skill uses Exa MCP to research the brand's public presence.
- Use Exa MCP to search for the brand's website content, social profiles, and public-facing copy
- Analyze homepage, about page, social bios, recent posts
- Extract voice patterns using the same DNA framework as Mode 1
- Present findings and ask user to confirm/adjust
- Generate voice profile
Mode Selection
Not sure which mode? Here's the decision tree:
- Have 3+ pieces of existing content (blog posts, emails, landing pages) → Mode 1: Extract
- Starting fresh with no content → Mode 2: Build via interview
- Have a live website URL → Mode 3: Auto-Scrape
If the brand has both a website AND existing content, prefer Mode 1 (Extract) — it captures the voice the brand already uses, which is more authentic than what a URL scan reveals.
Voice DNA Framework
Every voice maps across these axes:
Personality Spectrum
Rate each 1-10 with brief justification:
- Formal / Casual
- Reserved / Expressive
- Serious / Playful
- Traditional / Progressive
- Complex / Simple
- Cautious / Bold
Voice Markers
Sentence patterns: Average length, variation, structure (simple/compound/fragmented)
Vocabulary: Jargon level (none/light/technical), power words, forbidden words
Perspective: Person (I/we/you), distance (intimate/conversational/professional), authority (peer/mentor/expert/challenger)
The Do/Don't Table
Minimum 5 rows, maximum 10. Specific voice behaviors and example phrases.
Platform Adaptation Table
| Platform | Tone Shift | Length | Special Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| More professional, authority-forward | Medium | Lead with insight | |
| Twitter/X | Punchier, more direct | Short | Fragment sentences OK |
| Warmer, more visual language | Short-Medium | Casual, aspirational | |
| Most personal, conversational | Medium-Long | First-person storytelling | |
| Blog/SEO | Most detailed, structured | Long | Can be more technical |
| TikTok | Most casual, spoken-word feel | Very short | Conversational, raw |
| Threads | Thoughtful, conversational | Short-Medium | Opinion-led |
| Bluesky | Nuanced, substantive | Short | Informed, not aggressive |
Output Format
Header
BRAND VOICE PROFILE
[Brand/Person Name]
Generated [Month Day, Year]
Content
- Voice Summary (2-3 sentences capturing the essence)
- Personality Spectrum (rated axes)
- Voice Markers (sentence patterns, vocabulary, perspective)
- The Do/Don't Table
- Platform Adaptation Table
- Sample Copy (3 examples: short social post, email opener, landing page headline)
Files Saved
Write to ./brand/voice-profile.md.
What's Next
-> /positioning-angles Find your market angle
-> /direct-response-copy Write copy in your voice
-> /content-atomizer Create social content
File Output Protocol
Write ./brand/voice-profile.md with: last updated, voice summary, personality spectrum, voice markers, do/don't table, platform adaptations, sample copy.
If ./brand/voice-profile.md already exists: Read existing file, show what will change, ask for confirmation before overwriting.
Feedback
After the voice profile is saved and used in at least one downstream skill, collect feedback:
- "How did the voice feel in that [email/post/page]? (a) Nailed it, (b) Close but edited, (c) Off, (d) Haven't used yet"
- For (a) or (b): append what worked to
brand/learnings.mdwith date and skill name. - For (c): ask what felt wrong, adjust the voice profile, and log the change to
brand/learnings.md.
Voice Test Loop (Required)
After generating a voice profile from ANY mode, validate before saving. Full details in references/voice-modes.md.
- Generate 3 sample paragraphs in the brand's voice: email opening, social post, landing page hero.
- Present with options: (1) Nails it → save, (2) Close but needs adjustment → ask what's off, revise, re-test, (3) Not quite right → ask for examples, rebuild relevant sections, re-test.
- After 3 rounds without confirmation, offer: save current version, one more round, or restart with a different mode.
Never skip this step. Never save a profile without user confirmation.
Anti-Patterns
| Anti-pattern | Instead | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Generating a generic "professional yet approachable" voice | Extract specific patterns from real content or deep questioning | Generic profiles are useless — every downstream skill produces the same bland output. The whole point is differentiation. |
| Skipping the Voice Test Loop | Always validate with 3 samples before saving | A profile that looks right on paper can sound wrong in practice. The test loop catches mismatches before they propagate to all other skills. |
| Copy-pasting platform adaptation template defaults | Each brand has different platform behaviors — think about each one | A casual brand might be MORE formal on LinkedIn. A formal brand might loosen up on Twitter. Defaults are wrong by definition. |
| Writing the profile without reading existing brand context | Check positioning.md and audience.md first | Voice should align with positioning and audience. Writing voice in isolation means rewriting it later when those files exist. |
| Overwriting an existing profile without showing diff | Read existing file, show what will change, get confirmation | The user may have manually tweaked the profile. Blindly overwriting loses their refinements. |
| Producing a profile with no example phrases | On-brand and off-brand examples are required | Examples are the fastest way for downstream skills to calibrate. Without them, other skills have to interpret abstract axes, which leads to drift. |
Invocation
This skill activates when:
- User asks "what's my voice" or "analyze my brand"
- User says copy sounds "generic" or "off-brand"
- Another skill needs voice context but ./brand/voice-profile.md doesn't exist
- User provides a URL and asks to analyze the brand
What This Skill Is NOT
- Does NOT write copy (that is /direct-response-copy)
- Does NOT define positioning (that is /positioning-angles)
- Does NOT research the audience (that is /audience-research)
- Does NOT create visual identity (that is /creative)