Reframing

Skill meikocho1/alchemy-marketing-skills/skills/reframing

Rory Sutherland's psycho-logic as Claude skills — solve the human perception, not the metric. Reframing, costly signaling, counterintuitive tests, experience design.

Install

npx -y skills add meikocho1/alchemy-marketing-skills --skill reframing

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

2 stars2 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Change what something MEANS before you change what it IS — Rory Sutherland's cheapest lever. Use when a product, price, feature, or message is objectively fine but feels cheap, generic, boring, overpriced, or unjustified; when the user says 'how do we make this feel more premium/valuable/exciting', 'people don't get why it's worth it', 'how do we reposition/rename/repackage this', or wants to raise perceived value without changing the product or cutting the price. Covers renaming, recategorising, mental accounting (price framing), creating artificial value, and context-shifting. Inspired by Rory Sutherland's *Alchemy*. Routed to from psycho-logic. 日本語の相談（「高いと言われる」「安っぽく見える」「値下げせずに高級感を出したい」）にも使う。中文咨询（“被说太贵”“显得廉价”“不降价也想显得高级”）也适用。

SKILL.md

5.9 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Reframing — change the meaning, not the substance

The cheapest thing you can change is what something means. Same atoms, different frame, completely different behaviour. Reach for this before anyone proposes rebuilding the product or cutting the price — those are the expensive answers.

The principle

A thing has no fixed value; value is assigned by context and comparison. Move the frame and you move the value, at near-zero cost. Three reframing moves:

Rename / recategorise. The name is the frame. Change the category a thing competes in and you change what "good" and "expensive" mean for it.
Re-anchor the comparison. Value is relative. What you put next to a thing decides how it's judged.
Reframe the cost or the context. The same money, time, or effort feels different depending on the mental account it lands in.

Canonical examples (steal these patterns)

Diamond Shreddies. A square cereal was rotated 45° and relaunched as "new Diamond Shreddies" (with the old "Squares" kept on shelf as a contrast). Identical product. Sales rose, and people in taste tests said the diamonds tasted better. The product didn't change — its meaning did.
Frederick the Great's potato. Peasants refused to eat potatoes, so he declared them a royal vegetable, planted a royal field, and posted (deliberately lax) guards. Villagers concluded anything guarded must be valuable, stole the plants, and started growing them. Scarcity and status, manufactured purely by framing.
Mental accounting. "$1 a day" lands in a different mental pocket than "$30 a month" — same money, smaller-feeling cost. "Less than your morning coffee" reframes the expense entirely.
Premium by frame, not formula. Round prices and restrained design signal "quality"; .99 prices and "SALE" signal "value." You choose which by how you frame, not by changing the thing.

How to apply

Name the current frame. What category, comparison, and mental account is the thing sitting in right now? That's what's making it feel cheap/generic/expensive.
Decide the meaning you want ("premium and considered," "the safe obvious choice," "an indulgence you deserve," "a tiny daily cost").
Pick the cheapest frame shift that gets there:
- Rename / recategorise so it competes against more expensive things.
- Change the anchor sitting next to it (a higher reference price, a worse alternative, a prestige neighbour).
- Re-pocket the cost (per-day, per-use, "the price of X you already buy").
- Add a story or ritual that makes the same act feel meaningful.
Keep it honest. Reframing the meaning of a real benefit is alchemy; reframing a thing as something it isn't is fraud — and it collapses the moment the customer notices.
Test the frame against the substance fix. Always show the user: "Reframe = ~free and reversible. Rebuild/discount = expensive and permanent. Try the frame first."

日本語の使用例

「機能は十分なのに "安っぽく" 見える」→ 商品を変えず名前・カテゴリ・並べる比較対象を変える。例：同じサービスを "格安プラン" ではなく "○○専用の上位プラン" として上位帯の隣に置く。
「月額3万円が高いと言われる」→ 値下げ（高い解）の前にメンタルアカウンティングで言い換え："1日あたり約1,000円"、"スタッフ1人雇うより安い" など、落とす財布を変える。
葬儀/シニア領域：「"低価格" を全面に出すと逆に不安がられる」→ フレームを "安い" から "明朗・追加費用ゼロの安心" へ。価格そのものではなく、価格が置かれている意味（不安 vs 安心）を作り直す。

Cross-check against the canon

Sanity-check any reframe against these; if it contradicts one, name the contradiction and justify it. When a claim is load-bearing or the user asks for evidence or fresh examples, web-search the named theory or case and cite what you find.

Kahneman & Tversky, prospect theory / framing effect — losses loom roughly twice as large as gains; decide whether the frame should present a gain or an avoided loss.
Richard Thaler, mental accounting — every price lands in a mental pocket; a good reframe names which pocket it moves the cost into.
Al Ries & Jack Trout, Positioning — the frame lives in the prospect's mind, not in your copy; reframe relative to what's already there.
Cialdini's contrast principle — whatever sits next to the thing sets its value; check what the new frame makes the customer compare it against.

Related skills

psycho-logic — the router; start there to confirm reframing is the right lever
costly-signaling — when the problem is trust/desire rather than meaning, send a signal instead
counterintuitive-tests — validate a reframe cheaply before committing
marketing-psychology — anchoring, framing effect, mental accounting, contrast effect in detail (separate plugin — only if installed)