agentsclimarketplace
Sign in

Costly signaling

Skill meikocho1/alchemy-marketing-skills/skills/costly-signaling

Why expensive, wasteful, effortful, or self-deprecating actions build trust and desire — Rory Sutherland on signalling. Use when the problem is credibility or desirability rather than meaning: the user asks 'why don't people trust us', 'how do we look more credible/committed/premium', 'is our guarantee/warranty worth it', 'should we spend on brand advertising', 'how do we justify a higher price', or wonders why a cheaper-looking competitor wins. Covers costly signals (advertising spend, guarantees, over-delivery), price-as-quality-signal (Veblen goods), and the Pratfall Effect (admitting a real flaw to gain trust). Inspired by Rory Sutherland's *Alchemy*. Routed to from psycho-logic. 日本語の相談（「信頼されない」「安心してもらえない」「強気な価格で売りたい」「広告費に意味はある？」）にも使う。中文咨询（“不被信任”“想以高价出售”“广告费有意义吗？”）也适用。From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add meikocho1/alchemy-marketing-skills --skill costly-signaling

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 2 stars2 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

SKILL.md

6.3 KB, ~1.4k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Costly Signaling — trust is bought with waste

People can't see your intentions, only your actions — so they read your costly, hard-to-fake actions as proof. Anything cheap and easy to fake (a slogan, a claim, a promise) carries little signal. Anything expensive, effortful, or risky to you carries a lot. This is why "wasteful" things work.

The principle

A signal is credible in proportion to how much it would cost a liar. The peacock's tail is useless and metabolically expensive — that's exactly why it's a believable signal of fitness. Apply the same logic to a brand:

  • Advertising spend is itself the message. A big, visible campaign says "we expect to be here long enough to recoup this, and we have repeat customers." A fly-by-night operator can't afford it. The customer doesn't need to read the ad to get the signal.
  • Guarantees, warranties, free returns are costly signals: you'd only offer them if the product actually held up. The cost to you is the proof.
  • Over-delivery and effort ("we'll answer in three rings," lavish packaging, a hand-written note) signal commitment because they obviously cost something.
  • Price can be the feature. For Veblen goods (champagne, perfume, premium tools), a higher price increases desirability and even perceived performance — the expensive placebo genuinely works better. Cutting the price can destroy the signal.

The Pratfall Effect (the honest-flaw signal)

Admitting a real weakness is a costly, hard-to-fake move — so it reads as honesty, and honesty raises trust in everything else you say.

  • Avis: "We're number two. We try harder." Owning the weakness made the brand more likeable and more credible than claiming to be the best.
  • "It's ugly, but it works." / "We're not the cheapest, but here's why." A small genuine flaw makes the rest believable. Perfection reads as marketing; an admitted flaw reads as a person.

How to apply

  1. Read your current signal. Forget what you say — what do your actions cost you, and therefore prove? Cheap claims ("trusted," "premium," "#1") prove nothing.
  2. Find a signal a liar couldn't afford. A guarantee that would bankrupt you if the product were bad. Visible, sustained presence. Effort the customer can see. Real expertise on display.
  3. Consider price as a signal, not just a cost. If trust/desire is the problem, a higher price plus a costlier-looking presentation can outperform a discount. Test before assuming cheaper wins.
  4. Add one honest flaw (Pratfall). State a real limitation plainly. It buys credibility for every true claim around it. Never invent a fake flaw — that's just another cheap claim.
  5. Make sure the signal is honest. A costly signal works because it's tied to reality (you really will honour the guarantee, you really are committed). Faking it is expensive to you and fatal when discovered.

日本語の使用例

  • 「広告にお金をかける意味がわからない、クリックも測れない」→ 広告は支出そのものがシグナル。"これだけ出せる＝続く会社/リピートがある" と無意識に伝わる。直接効果だけで測ると本質を外す。
  • 「強気の価格にすると売れなくなる気がする」→ 信頼・憧れが課題なら値下げはシグナルを壊す。高い価格＋それに見合う見せ方の方が効くことがある（ヴェブレン財）。counterintuitive-tests で検証。
  • 「完璧に良く見せたいのに刺さらない」→ プラットフォール効果。本当の弱点を1つ正直に開示すると、残りの主張全部の信頼が上がる。
  • 葬儀/シニア領域：「安心してもらいたい」→ "安心です" と言う（安い主張）のではなく、追加料金ゼロの明朗会計・返金保証・24時間必ず人が出る など "嘘つきには払えないコスト" を提示する。

Cross-check against the canon

Sanity-check any proposed signal against these; if it contradicts one, name the contradiction and justify it. When a claim is load-bearing or the user asks for evidence or fresh examples, web-search the named theory or case and cite what you find.

  • Amotz Zahavi, the handicap principle — the biology: a signal is honest because it's costly to fake. If your proposed signal is cheap to imitate, it isn't a signal.
  • Michael Spence, signalling theory — signals work when they're cheaper for honest senders than for liars; check the cost asymmetry, not just the cost.
  • Thorstein Veblen, conspicuous consumption — for status goods, price is the display; discounting can destroy the product's actual function.
  • Elliot Aronson, the pratfall effect (1966) — the caveat: an admitted flaw raises trust only when competence is already established. A struggling brand admitting flaws just looks weak — build the credibility signal first.

Related skills

  • psycho-logic — the router; confirm trust/desire (not meaning) is the real problem
  • reframing — if the issue is meaning rather than credibility, change the frame instead
  • counterintuitive-tests — test price-as-signal and pratfall copy before rolling out
  • marketing-psychology — authority bias, social proof, scarcity, loss aversion in detail (separate plugin — only if installed)

What ships with it: 1 file

1.7 KB alongside SKILL.md

evals/

Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most marketing audience skills give in ~1.4k tokens

Counted across 690 of the 894 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-08-07

  • Apply Poppins font to headingsin 41 of 690, across 6 files
  • Apply Lora font to body textin 41 of 690, across 6 files
  • Use Arial fallback for headingsin 39 of 690, across 4 files
  • Use Georgia fallback for body textin 39 of 690, across 4 files
  • Maintain text hierarchy and formattingin 39 of 690, across 4 files
  • Use accent colors for non-text shapesin 38 of 690, across 3 files
  • Use RGB values for precise color matchingin 38 of 690, across 3 files
  • Use brand colors for primary text and backgroundsin 36 of 690, across 1 file
  • Read product marketing context file before asking questions, starting, or auditingin 35 of 690, across 23 files
  • Use active voice instead of passive voicein 26 of 690, across 10 files
  • Implement or generate appropriate JSON-LD structured datain 24 of 690, across 17 files
  • Prioritize clarity over clevernessin 22 of 690, across 8 files

Said here and by no other author read

  • assess what current actions actually cost
  • find signals a liar cannot afford
  • treat price as a signal not a cost
  • admit one genuine flaw to build trust
  • ensure the signal is honest
  • check cost asymmetry between honest senders and liars

Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 325,949. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.