Deep research

Skill MARUCIE/openclaw-foundry/web/public/packs/research-analyst/skills/deep-research

The curated AI Agent skill marketplace — 37K+ vetted skills, S/A/B/C ratings, deploy anywhere

Install

npx -y skills add MARUCIE/openclaw-foundry --skill deep-research

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Use when task requires multi-step information synthesis across sources, not answerable in one search. Runs 7-stage research pipeline with sub-agents. NOT for quick lookups or single-source questions. Trigger: research, comprehensive analysis, literature review.

SKILL.md

3.5 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

是什么

把"一个模糊的研究问题"拆成多智能体并行检索 + 来源分级 + 交叉验证的七阶段流水线，帮你在几小时内把碎片信息汇成一份带可追溯引用的研究报告，而不是攒一堆链接自己头大。

怎么用

先把研究问题、成功标准、输出格式说清楚（这一步省了，后面整份报告都会跑偏）。
把大问题拆成 3-5 个子问题，每个子问题指定优先来源类型（学术 / 行业 / 一手数据）。
让多个子智能体并行去查，每条结论必须挂上 A-E 来源分级（A 同行评议 / E 道听途说）。
进入交叉验证阶段，把不同来源的冲突结论摆出来调和，B 级以下的结论必须标注不确定性。
最后做合成 + 引用核查 + 报告封装，交付带执行摘要、参考文献、不确定性说明的成品。

架构图

flowchart LR
  A[研究问题] --> B[子问题拆解]
  B --> C[多智能体并行检索]
  C --> D[来源 A-E 分级]
  D --> E[交叉验证]
  E --> F[合成报告 + 引用核查]

Deep Research -- Graph of Thoughts Pipeline

Gotchas

Don't skip Phase 1 (scoping). Most research failures come from a vague question, not bad searching. Clarify output format, success criteria, and constraints BEFORE spawning agents.
Sub-agent count matters. 3-5 Web research agents + 1-2 academic agents + 1 cross-validation agent. More than 8 total agents = context explosion with diminishing returns.
Source quality rating is non-negotiable. Every claim needs a grade:

Grade	What counts
A	Peer-reviewed RCT, systematic review, meta-analysis
B	Cohort study, clinical guideline, official report
C	Expert opinion, case report
D	Preprint, conference abstract
E	Anecdote, speculation

Claims below B-grade need explicit uncertainty labels. Don't present D/E sources as facts.
Cross-validation is a phase, not a suggestion. Phase 4 (triangulation) must run before synthesis. Skip it and you get confident-sounding hallucinations.

7-Stage Pipeline

Phase 1: Question Scoping -> clarify with user, define success criteria
Phase 2: Retrieval Planning -> decompose into sub-queries, select sources
Phase 3: Iterative Querying -> spawn sub-agents, execute searches
Phase 4: Source Triangulation -> cross-reference, resolve conflicts, grade sources
Phase 5: Knowledge Synthesis -> structure findings, inline citations
Phase 6: Quality Assurance -> verify citations match content, check for hallucination
Phase 7: Output & Packaging -> format report, executive summary, bibliography

Usage

ait deep-research "research topic"
# Or in conversation: "Deep research [topic]"

Quality Gate

Every factual claim has a graded, verifiable source
Key findings confirmed by 2+ independent sources
Contradictions acknowledged and explained
No unsupported claims (check for hallucination in Phase 6)

Agent Foundry Team