agentsclimarketplace

Lean canvas

Skill MARUCIE/openclaw-foundry/web/public/packs/executive-strategist/skills/lean-canvas

Use when exploring startup hypotheses, testing business model viability, or comparing venture ideas on a single page. Trigger: user says 'lean canvas', 'business model', 'startup hypothesis', 'one-page business plan', or when validating whether an idea is worth pursuing before building anything.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add MARUCIE/openclaw-foundry --skill lean-canvas

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

SKILL.md

5.8 KB, ~1.4k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

是什么

Lean Canvas(精益画布)是给早期创业项目用的一页式假设清单,让你把"问题、客户、解决方案、不公平优势"这四件事写到能被反驳的颗粒度,避免在还没验证就开始烧钱建团队。

怎么用

  1. 先写问题和目标客户,问题写不出三个具体场景就说明对客户理解不够。
  2. 用一句话写价值主张(UVP,Unique Value Proposition,独特价值主张),能让陌生人听懂为止。
  3. 配上解决方案、渠道、关键指标,确认每个假设都有可被验证的下一步动作。
  4. 跑一遍成本结构和收入流,看清商业模式能否在小规模时就为正。
  5. 把"不公平优势"留到最后,没有它就承认目前还没有,逼自己继续找。

架构图

flowchart LR
  A[问题] --> B[目标客户]
  B --> C[价值主张 UVP]
  C --> D[解决方案与渠道]
  D --> E[关键指标]
  E --> F[成本与收入]
  F --> G[不公平优势]

Lean Canvas

Metadata

  • Name: lean-canvas
  • Description: Generate a Lean Canvas business model with detailed sections for problem, solution, metrics, cost structure, UVP, unfair advantage, channels, segments, and revenue.
  • Triggers: lean canvas, startup canvas, lean model, business hypothesis

Instructions

You are a business model strategist designing a Lean Canvas for $ARGUMENTS.

Your task is to create a comprehensive Lean Canvas that outlines the business hypothesis and key business model assumptions for the product.

Input Requirements

  • Product or feature description
  • Target customer segment(s)
  • Market context and problem space
  • Any available metrics or business constraints

Lean Canvas Template

Section 1: Product Definition

1. Problem

  • Top 3 customer problems or needs
  • Customer pains and frustrations
  • Current unsatisfactory solutions

2. Solution

  • Top 3 features or approaches
  • How each feature addresses the problem
  • Why this solution is novel or better

3. Unique Value Proposition (UVP)

  • Concise, memorable statement
  • Why customers choose you over alternatives
  • What makes you different (not just "better")

4. Unfair Advantage

  • What defensibility exists?
  • Barriers to competition (network effects, brand, IP, switching costs)
  • What competitors can't easily replicate

Section 2: Market & Traction

5. Customer Segments

  • Who is the target customer?
  • Early adopters and first segment
  • Customer personas or archetypes
  • How large is the addressable market?

6. Channels

  • How do you reach customers?
  • Primary acquisition channels
  • Distribution and sales approach
  • How do customers find you?

7. Revenue Streams

  • How do you make money?
  • Pricing model or revenue per customer
  • Customer lifetime value (LTV)
  • Revenue growth assumptions

Section 3: Economics & Validation

8. Cost Structure

  • Fixed costs (salaries, infrastructure, facilities)
  • Variable costs (COGS, transaction costs, support)
  • Key cost drivers
  • Cost per customer acquisition (CAC)

9. Key Metrics

  • Activation: How do users get value quickly?
  • Retention: How many users stick around?
  • Revenue: How do we measure financial success?
  • North Star metric for the business

Output Process

  1. Define the core problem(s) being solved
  2. Outline 2-3 solution approaches
  3. Craft a compelling UVP
  4. Identify what creates competitive advantage
  5. Target 1-2 customer segments
  6. Map acquisition channels
  7. Define revenue model and pricing
  8. Estimate cost structure
  9. Identify 3-5 critical metrics to track
  10. Surface key assumptions and hypotheses
  11. Suggest validation experiments (landing page, interviews, MVP)

Domain Context

Lean Canvas vs Business Model Canvas vs Startup Canvas:

Lean Canvas (Lean Canvas literature) is a startup-focused adaptation of the Business Model Canvas that replaces Partners/Activities/Resources with Problem/Solution/Unfair Advantage. It's fast and hypothesis-driven, but has known limitations:

  • Redundancy: "Problem" overlaps with Market Segments (markets are defined by problems/JTBD), and "Solution" overlaps with Value Proposition (which by definition includes features). This can create confusion about what goes where.
  • Missing strategic sections: No vision (why should your team wake up every day?), no trade-offs (what you choose NOT to do), no relative costs (low cost vs unique value positioning), no key metrics.
  • Narrow defensibility: "Unfair Advantage" focuses on one defensive element, but strong strategy is hard to copy as an integrated whole — not because of a single advantage.
  • No coherence check: Doesn't address whether all strategic choices reinforce each other.

When to use Lean Canvas: Quick hypothesis testing when you need speed over completeness. Best as a brainstorming tool, not a strategy document.

Consider instead: Startup Canvas (JTBD template literature) separates strategy (9 sections from the Product Strategy Canvas) from business model (Cost Structure + Revenue Streams). Recommended when you need both strategic clarity AND a business model for a new product.

Notes

  • The Lean Canvas is designed for rapid hypothesis testing
  • Focus on addressing the riskiest assumptions first
  • Update the canvas as you learn and validate
  • Each section should be specific and measurable where possible
  • This canvas helps align founding teams on business strategy

Further Reading

What ships with it

Read from the repository

Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.

Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most operations skills give in ~1.4k tokens

Counted across 483 of the 484 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-08-07

  • Collect monitoring data throughout the simulationin 14 of 483, across 6 files
  • Set the random seed for reproducibilityin 14 of 483, across 6 files
  • Validate simulations against analytical solutionsin 12 of 483, across 4 files
  • Clarify goals, constraints, and inputsin 11 of 483, across 2 files
  • Implement contract tests for integration pointsin 11 of 483, across 2 files
  • Implement strangler fig infrastructure with API gatewayin 11 of 483, across 2 files
  • Audit modernized components for security vulnerabilitiesin 11 of 483, across 2 files
  • Avoid Python blocking calls in processesin 10 of 483, across 3 files
  • Use resource context managers for automatic cleanupin 9 of 483, across 2 files
  • Maintain consistent time unitsin 9 of 483, across 2 files
  • Validate outcomes against success criteriain 8 of 483, across 1 file
  • Analyze the legacy codebase for technical debtin 8 of 483, across 1 file

Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 325,949. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.