agentsclimarketplace

Sota observability

Skill martinholovsky/SOTA-skills/skills/sota-observability

State-of-the-Art (2026) AI/LLM engineering skills/agents for building and auditing software — 40+ domain & language skills, BUILD/AUDIT modes, audit checklists.

Install
npx -y skills add martinholovsky/SOTA-skills --skill sota-observability

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 8 stars8 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

State-of-the-art observability and reliability engineering (2026). Use when instrumenting code (structured logging, metrics, distributed tracing with OpenTelemetry, SLOs, alerting, health endpoints) or auditing an existing codebase's observability posture (can on-call answer "why is this request slow?" and "what broke at 3am?"). Not for security detections, SIEM, or threat hunting — use sota-detection-engineering. Triggers: logging, metrics, tracing, monitoring, alerting, SLO, SLI, error budget, OpenTelemetry, OTel, Prometheus, Grafana, debugging production, incident, on-call, telemetry, instrumentation, health check, runbook, Sentry, crash reporting, profiling.

SKILL.md

7.1 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

SOTA Observability & Reliability

Purpose

Make every production system answerable. Two questions define success:

  1. "Why is this request slow/failing?" — answerable for any single request from a trace ID, without adding new instrumentation.
  2. "What broke at 3am?" — answerable from symptom-based alerts that page only when users are hurt, each linked to a runbook and a dashboard that narrows cause in minutes.

This skill covers structured logging, metrics, distributed tracing, SLOs and alerting, and operational readiness — both how to build them correctly and how to audit them adversarially. Telemetry is a product with users (on-call engineers) and costs (storage, cardinality, attention). Treat both.

BUILD mode

When writing or modifying code, apply the rules files as design constraints, not afterthoughts. Workflow:

  1. Identify the signal need before coding. For each new endpoint, job, or consumer: which SLI does it affect, what one wide event describes a unit of work, what spans bound its external calls.
  2. Instrument with OpenTelemetry API (not vendor SDKs) in libraries; configure SDK/exporters only at the application entry point. Follow OTel semantic conventions for names and attributes.
  3. Emit one canonical wide event per request/job at completion, carrying trace_id, outcome, durations, and business context. Debug logs are supplementary, sampled, and disposable.
  4. Propagate context everywhere: W3C traceparent over HTTP, injected into queue message headers, restored in consumers and scheduled jobs.
  5. Redact at the logger, never at call sites. Denylist+allowlist serializers for PII/secrets; fail closed on unknown object dumps.
  6. Budget cardinality. Every metric label must have a known, bounded value set. No IDs, no URLs, no user input in labels.
  7. Ship the operational surface with the feature: health endpoints with correct liveness/readiness semantics, dashboard panels answering the questions the feature raises, burn-rate alerts wired to the SLO, runbook entry for each new alert.
  8. Verify by simulation: kill a dependency, send a slow request, trigger an error — confirm the trace, the wide event, the metric, and the alert all show it, and that they cross-link (exemplars, trace_id in logs).

AUDIT mode

Assess an existing codebase/deployment. Read rules/06 first for the full playbook; sample real code paths, do not trust README claims.

Severity conventions:

SeverityMeaningExamples
CRITICALBlind during incidents, or telemetry is itself a hazardSecrets/PII in logs; no error visibility at all; liveness check hits the database (restart storms); unauthenticated debug/pprof endpoints
HIGHMaterially slows MTTR or breaks at scaleNo correlation/trace IDs; unbounded label cardinality; cause-based paging alerts with no runbooks; readiness == liveness; percentiles averaged across instances
MEDIUMDegrades signal quality or cost disciplineWrong log levels (ERROR for expected events); no exemplars; head-only sampling losing all error traces; dashboards as vanity walls; no log sampling on hot paths
LOWHygiene and polishInconsistent field names; missing OTel semantic conventions; unpinned dashboard queries; noisy Sentry grouping

Finding format (one per finding):

[SEVERITY] <short title>
Where: <file:line, config path, or dashboard/alert name>
Evidence: <exact code/config snippet or observed behavior>
Impact: <what fails during an incident or at scale, concretely>
Fix: <specific change, with code/config if short>
Effort: <S/M/L>

Conclude every audit with the two-question verdict: can on-call currently answer "why is this request slow?" and "what broke at 3am?" — YES/PARTIAL/NO, with the shortest path to YES.

Rules index

FileRead this when...
rules/01-structured-logging.mdWriting or reviewing log statements, choosing levels, designing wide events/canonical log lines, configuring redaction, sampling, or controlling log spend
rules/02-metrics.mdAdding Prometheus/OTel metrics, choosing counter vs gauge vs histogram, designing labels, computing percentiles, applying RED/USE, linking metrics to traces via exemplars
rules/03-tracing.mdInstrumenting with OpenTelemetry, deciding what gets a span, propagating context across HTTP/queues/jobs, choosing head vs tail sampling, using (or avoiding) baggage
rules/04-slos-alerting.mdDefining SLIs/SLOs, error budgets, writing burn-rate alerts, reviewing alert quality, fighting alert fatigue, deciding page vs ticket
rules/05-operational-readiness.mdImplementing health endpoints, exposing graceful degradation, securing debug endpoints, continuous profiling, Sentry-style error tracking, building dashboards
rules/06-audit-playbook.mdAuditing a codebase's observability posture end-to-end; common gaps catalog; scoring and reporting

Top 10 non-negotiables

  1. Every log line carries a trace/correlation ID. A log you cannot join to a request is gossip, not evidence.
  2. ERROR means a human must act. If nobody should be woken or ticketed, it is WARN or below. Level discipline is alert discipline upstream.
  3. No secrets or PII in telemetry — enforced at the logger/exporter, not by call-site vigilance. Redaction is infrastructure, not convention.
  4. One wide event per unit of work (request/job/message) with outcome, duration, and business context — the canonical log line you grep at 3am.
  5. Metric labels are bounded. No user IDs, emails, raw URLs, or free text. Cardinality explosions take down the monitoring you need most.
  6. Never average percentiles. Aggregate histograms, then compute quantiles. A dashboard of avg(p99) is fiction.
  7. OpenTelemetry API in libraries, SDK only at the edge. W3C traceparent propagated across every HTTP hop, queue, and async job.
  8. Liveness checks process health only; readiness checks dependencies. Conflating them turns one slow dependency into a cluster-wide restart storm.
  9. Every page is actionable, symptom-based, and runbook-linked. Alert on user pain (SLO burn rate, multi-window), not on causes (CPU, pod restarts).
  10. Telemetry has a budget. Sample debug logs and traces deliberately (tail-sample to keep errors/slow), review cost monthly, delete signals nobody queries.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.