Multi strategy orchestration
Skill mahmoud20138/Tradecraft/plugins/tradecraft/skills/multi-strategy-orchestration
102 Claude Code skills across 7 categories -- trading strategies, Azure, VSCode extensions, AI prompts, and custom automation skills
npx -y skills add mahmoud20138/Tradecraft --skill multi-strategy-orchestrationAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 7 stars7 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Pipeline for running multiple trading strategies simultaneously. Signal arbitration, conflict resolution, capital allocation per strategy, risk aggregation, and regime switchover logic. The brain that coordinates all strategy agents. USE FOR: multi-strategy, strategy orchestration, signal conflict, strategy pipeline, run multiple strategies, strategy coordination, risk aggregation, portfolio heat, regime switchover, strategy agent, trading pipeline, strategy conflict resolution, how to combine strategies, which strategy wins, signal weighting.
SKILL.md
14.3 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Skill: Multi Strategy Orchestration | Domain: trading | Category: meta-intelligence | Level: expert Tags:
trading,orchestration,strategy,pipeline,risk,meta
Multi-Strategy Orchestration
The command layer: regime detection → strategy selection → allocation → this file → execution For strategy weights → see
portfolio-optimization.mdFor execution mechanics → seetrading-brain.md
Orchestration Pipeline
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ ORCHESTRATION PIPELINE │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ 1. REGIME DETECTION │
│ market-regime-classifier.md │
│ → Output: TRENDING | RANGING | TRANSITIONING | VOL │
│ │
│ 2. STRATEGY SELECTION │
│ strategy-selection.md │
│ → Output: Active strategy set for current regime │
│ │
│ 3. PORTFOLIO ALLOCATION │
│ portfolio-optimization.md │
│ → Output: Weight per strategy, max positions │
│ │
│ 4. SIGNAL GENERATION (parallel) │
│ Each active strategy scans independently: │
│ ├── ICT MSS+FVG scanner │
│ ├── ORB detector │
│ ├── S&D zone fade scanner │
│ └── Liquidity trap scanner │
│ → Output: Raw signals with confluence scores │
│ │
│ 5. SIGNAL ARBITRATION ← THIS FILE │
│ Resolve conflicts, rank, filter │
│ → Output: Approved trade list │
│ │
│ 6. RISK CHECK │
│ risk-and-portfolio.md │
│ → Output: Position sizes, heat check │
│ │
│ 7. EXECUTION │
│ execute_trades.py │
│ → Output: Open positions │
│ │
│ 8. MONITORING & REBALANCE (loop) │
│ → Regime change? → Back to step 1 │
│ → Drawdown threshold? → Scale down │
│ → Session change? → Adjust weights │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Signal Arbitration
When Strategies Agree (Confluence)
Multiple strategies signal SAME direction on SAME instrument:
→ STRONGEST setup — increase conviction
Scoring:
1 strategy agrees: Base signal (normal size)
2 strategies agree: +25% confidence (can increase to 1.25% risk)
3+ strategies agree: +50% confidence (can increase to 1.5% risk)
Example:
ICT MSS+FVG signals LONG XAUUSDm (confluence: 7/10)
ORB signals LONG XAUUSDm (confluence: 5/10)
S&D zone supports LONG XAUUSDm (zone tested)
→ 3 strategies agree → 1.5% risk, highest priority entry
When Strategies Conflict (Opposing Signals)
Two strategies signal OPPOSITE direction on SAME instrument:
Resolution rules (in priority order):
1. HTF WINS: Strategy aligned with daily/4H trend takes priority
→ If daily bullish + ICT signals long + ORB signals short
→ Take the ICT long, ignore ORB short
2. HIGHER CONFLUENCE WINS: Compare confluence scores
→ If S&D fade: 8/10 vs ICT trend: 5/10
→ Take S&D fade (but at half size due to conflict)
3. HIGHER TIMEFRAME STRATEGY WINS: 4H signal > 1H signal > M5 signal
→ If 4H OB signals long + M5 ORB signals short
→ Take 4H OB long
4. IF TRULY EQUAL: NO TRADE on that instrument
→ Conflicting signals = market indecision
→ Move to next instrument with clearer signal
NEVER take both sides of a conflict simultaneously.
Signal Priority Ranking
When multiple valid signals across different instruments:
Priority 1: Multi-strategy confluence (3+ strategies agree)
Priority 2: HTF-aligned + high confluence (7+/10)
Priority 3: Killzone-aligned signals (correct session)
Priority 4: Single strategy, high confluence (7+/10)
Priority 5: Single strategy, moderate confluence (4-6/10)
Execute in priority order until:
- Max position count reached (from allocation table)
- Portfolio heat limit reached (from risk rules)
- No more valid signals above confluence threshold
Capital Allocation Per Strategy
Equity Bucketing Model
Total trading equity: 100%
├── Strategy A (ICT trend): 40% of equity → max 2 positions × 1%
├── Strategy B (ORB): 20% of equity → max 1 position × 1%
├── Strategy C (S&D fade): 20% of equity → max 2 positions × 0.5%
├── Strategy D (liquidity trap):20% of equity → max 1 position × 0.5%
└── Reserve: 0% (fully allocated when regime clear)
Per-strategy equity is a SOFT LIMIT:
- Strategy can exceed allocation by 25% if confluence > 8/10
- Strategy must reduce to 0% if regime changes away from it
- Reserve builds to 20-40% during VOLATILE regime (cash is a position)
Kelly-Adjusted Strategy Sizing
For each strategy, calculate optimal fraction:
Kelly % = (Win Rate × Avg Win) - (Loss Rate × Avg Loss)
───────────────────────────────────────────────
Avg Win
Half-Kelly (conservative):
Strategy | WR | Avg W | Avg L | Kelly | Half-K | Max Risk
────────────────┼──────┼───────┼───────┼───────┼────────┼─────────
ICT MSS+FVG | 55% | 2.5R | 1.0R | 19.5% | 9.75% | 1.0%
ORB Break/Rest | 60% | 2.0R | 1.0R | 20.0% | 10.0% | 1.0%
S&D Zone Fade | 65% | 1.5R | 1.0R | 21.7% | 10.8% | 0.75%
Liquidity Trap | 50% | 3.0R | 1.0R | 16.7% | 8.3% | 0.75%
Cap at 1% regardless of Kelly — protect against overfitting.
Risk Aggregation
Portfolio Heat Dashboard
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ PORTFOLIO HEAT CHECK │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Strategy │ Positions │ Risk Each │ Heat │
│─────────────────┼───────────┼───────────┼────────│
│ ICT MSS+FVG │ 2 │ 1.0% │ 2.0% │
│ ORB NY │ 1 │ 1.0% │ 1.0% │
│ S&D Fade │ 1 │ 0.5% │ 0.5% │
│ Liquidity Trap │ 0 │ — │ 0.0% │
├─────────────────┼───────────┼───────────┼────────│
│ TOTAL │ 4 │ │ 3.5% │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Max heat: 6% (trending) │ Status: ✅ UNDER LIMIT │
│ Correlated heat: 2.0% (2 gold positions) │
│ Corr limit: 3% │ Status: ✅ UNDER LIMIT │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Heat Limits by Regime
Regime | Max Total Heat | Max Per Strategy | Max Correlated
───────────────┼────────────────┼──────────────────┼───────────────
TRENDING | 6% | 3% | 3%
RANGING | 4% | 2% | 2%
TRANSITIONING | 3% | 1.5% | 1.5%
VOLATILE | 1% | 1% | 1%
Regime Switchover Logic
Detection → Action Timeline
Regime change detected (e.g., TRENDING → RANGING):
T+0 min: DETECT — VP shape changed, ATR dropped below threshold
T+0 min: FREEZE — No new entries from old regime strategies
T+5 min: ASSESS — Are existing positions still valid?
├── Position WITH new regime → KEEP (adjust SL/TP)
└── Position AGAINST new regime → CLOSE or TIGHTEN
T+10 min: SWITCH — New strategy allocation active
T+15 min: SCAN — New regime strategies begin scanning for signals
T+30 min: EXECUTE — First entries under new regime allocation
Total switchover time: ~30 minutes
During switchover: maximum 2% portfolio heat (protective)
Regime Confidence Scoring
Don't switch on weak signals. Require confirmation:
Confidence Score (0-10):
+2 VP shape confirms new regime
+2 ATR confirms (above/below 20-day avg)
+2 Price structure confirms (HH/HL or LH/LL established)
+2 Cumulative delta confirms
+1 Session timing supports (London open often triggers transitions)
+1 News catalyst present (fundamental driver for regime change)
Score 7+ → CONFIRMED regime change → full switchover
Score 4-6 → POSSIBLE change → reduce allocation 50%, wait for confirmation
Score <4 → NOISE → maintain current regime allocation
Conflict Resolution Matrix
Scenario | Resolution
──────────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────────
Same signal, same instrument | Combine → highest confluence entry
Opposing signals, same instrument | HTF wins, or skip if truly equal
Same signal, correlated pairs | Take strongest setup only
Opposing signals, correlated pairs| Take neither — market unclear
Strategy says trade, regime says no| Regime overrides strategy always
Multiple instruments, limited heat| Rank by priority, fill top-down
News event approaching | Freeze all signals until T+30 min
Drawdown >4% active | Half all allocations immediately
Monitoring Loop
# Conceptual orchestration loop (runs every 5 min during session)
def orchestration_loop():
# 1. Check regime
regime = detect_regime() # TRENDING | RANGING | TRANSITIONING | VOLATILE
# 2. Get active strategies for regime
strategies = select_strategies(regime)
# 3. Get allocation weights
weights = get_allocation(regime, current_session(), current_drawdown())
# 4. Generate signals (parallel)
signals = []
for strategy in strategies:
sigs = strategy.scan(watched_symbols)
signals.extend(sigs)
# 5. Arbitrate conflicts
approved = arbitrate_signals(signals, weights)
# 6. Risk check
approved = risk_filter(approved, current_positions(), heat_limits[regime])
# 7. Execute approved signals
for signal in approved:
execute_trade(signal)
# 8. Monitor existing positions
for position in current_positions():
if not valid_for_regime(position, regime):
tighten_or_close(position)
Strategy Performance Tracking
Track per-strategy metrics to adjust future allocation:
Weekly Review:
Strategy | Trades | WR | Avg R | Total R | Sharpe
────────────────┼────────┼───────┼────────┼─────────┼───────
ICT MSS+FVG | 8 | 62% | +1.8R | +6.4R | 2.1
ORB | 5 | 60% | +1.5R | +3.0R | 1.8
S&D Fade | 6 | 67% | +1.2R | +2.4R | 1.6
Liquidity Trap | 3 | 33% | +2.5R | -0.5R | 0.3
Action: If strategy Sharpe < 1.0 for 2 consecutive weeks:
→ Reduce allocation by 50%
→ Review: is the strategy broken, or is regime wrong for it?
→ If regime-appropriate but still underperforming → bench for 1 week